Scottish yes vote could have 'material impact' on borrowing, tax and procedures under two regulatory systems, says bank group
By
Severin Carrell, Scotland
correspondent
Lloyds
has set up working groups to investigate the impact if the Scotland vote was in
favour of the country's independence. Photograph: Luke Macgregor/Reuters
Lloyds
Banking group has issued guarded advice that Scottish independence could have a
"material impact" on its costs and borrowing, potentially driving
costs up for its businesses and customers.
In
its annual report, Lloyds said the impact of a yes vote in September's
referendum was uncertain, but that it could have a direct impact on its
borrowing costs, tax position and costs of working under two different
regulatory systems.
Its
cautionary notes are more muted than the explicit statements from RBS and the
finance group Standard Life last month concerning their fears of independence
having a "significant impact" on their business.
However,
it emerged that senior Lloyds executives believe they would have to move their
group-registered office from Edinburgh to London under an EU directive which
states that insurers and banks must have their head offices and registered
offices in the same member state.
Opposition
parties in the Scottish parliament claimed that these developments showed a
growing number of large employers were worried about the referendum, while
Scotland's government insisted that many of the fears would be dealt with if
the UK government agreed to a formal currency and banking union.
Iain
Gray, Labour's Scottish finance spokesman, said: "The SNP can no longer
continue to just put their fingers in their ears and claim that they do not
really mean it. To simply dismiss these warnings is to treat the fears of
Scottish workers in these companies with contempt."
Last
month, the new TSB bank, hived off from Lloyds to increase competition in
retail banking, was established with its headquarters in London, despite being
founded in Scotland.
The
BBC's business editor, Robert Peston, said sources at Lloyds, and City
regulators, had disclosed that they were taking legal advice about the 1995 EU
directive on insurance, investment and credit providers, which so far remained
untested in the courts and had no case law linked to it.
Although
only a small number of jobs are tied to Lloyds' registered office in Edinburgh,
bank executives believe there is a clear logic to the directive's policy, since
Scotland and the UK would be separate states after independence, with
Scotland's future status as a new EU member state still unclear.
Lloyds
has set up working groups to investigate the possible impacts of independence;
these are run by its Scottish executive committee at its small, largely
symbolic, registered office at the Mound in Edinburgh, overseen by the banking
executive Philip Grant.
Lloyds
said its "key mitigating actions" were to investigate "the
potential impact on the group's business and impact on customers of a vote in
favour of Scottish independence".
Lloyds
is taking a more cautious approach than Edinburgh-based RBS, which said last
month that a yes vote could "significantly impact the group's credit
ratings and could also impact the fiscal, monetary, legal and regulatory
landscape to which the group is subject".
It
is understood Lloyds would wait until there was a yes vote this September before
making more explicit statements about its fears or interests post-independence,
given that there would be at least 18 months of negotiations before Scotland
became a separate state.
The
bank is not expected to follow Standard Life, which is one of Scotland's
largest employers but does 90% of its business in the rest of the UK. Standard
Life said last week it could move large chunks of its operations to England if
independence left it facing greater costs and problems with a currency and
finance sector regulation.
No comments:
Post a Comment