By Colin Freeman
One of the world's most
lawless terror groups was considered too hostile to work together - let alone
wreak devastation on others.
Illustration: Andrew
Dyson.
Among the raft of al-Qaeda
groups that sprang up around the world after 9/11, the Somali branch of the
franchise was not one of the more promising start-ups. A direct product of life
in the most lawless corner of the planet, al-Shabab's followers were considered
too violent and quarrelsome even to work with each other, never mind pose a
threat to the rest of the world. For all their videos declaring themselves ''at
Bin Laden's service'', the joke among Western intelligence agencies was that
even al-Qaeda's high command would struggle to get anything organised in
chaotic Somalia.
Two days ago, on what
should have been a pleasant lunchtime in the affluent Nairobi suburb of
Westlands, al-Shabab appeared to prove their doubters wrong. In a disciplined,
highly co-ordinated attack, at least a dozen gunmen armed with assault rifles
and grenades stormed a shopping mall popular with both locals and expatriates,
embarking on an orgy of violence that was both savagely random and chillingly
discriminate.
According to witnesses,
Muslims - who make up about a third of Kenya's mainly Christian population -
were ordered by the gunmen to leave the scene. Everyone else had to remain
behind for the slaughter. Already the attack is the deadliest on Kenyan soil
since al-Qaeda's 1998 bombing of Nairobi's US embassy, which killed more than
200.
High though the casualty
figures were, the real shock was the way it was relayed in real time through
digital media. Not only did fleeing shoppers take mobile phone footage of dead
bodies and terrified mothers clutching their children, there was a gleeful
running commentary from al-Shabab's Twitter feed, a 21st-century mouthpiece
spitting 8th-century religious venom.
Advertisement
What the wider world
witnessed, meanwhile, was the coming of age of a group that was all but unknown
10 years ago, but whose sympathisers in Somalia's vast diasporas now pose as
much of a threat to Western interests as any other al-Qaeda franchise.
So who exactly is Harakat
al-Shabab al-Mujahideen, to give it its full title? The shortened version of
the name translates as ''The Youth'' - the current generation of which in
Somalia has grown up with some of the bleakest prospects on the planet. Most have
known nothing but anarchy in their home country, which has been without a
properly functioning government since 1991. It is perhaps no surprise that many
have broken with Somalia's long-standing tradition of moderate Sufi Islam to
embrace more militant strains exported from the Saudi peninsula, which has set
up vast numbers of madrassas in Somalia in the past 20 years.
I first heard of al-Shabab
on a trip to Mogadishu in 2006, when a coalition of Islamists - including
moderates - had managed to impose peace after nearly a decade-and-a-half of
warlord thuggery. As we saw during a visit to a barracks outside the capital,
the Islamists' trick was partly to put warlords' ex-foot soldiers through
religious ''bootcamp'', converting yesterday's murderers, robbers and rapists
into tomorrow's holy warriors.
But alongside the fragile
peace came Taliban-style strictures banning music, dancing and most other kinds
of fun. Fearing that Somalia's new Islamist overlords would also turn it into a
haven for al-Qaeda, in early 2007 Washington authorised an invasion by
neighbouring Ethiopia. Islamist rule was replaced with a transitional
government propped up by United Nations mandate, Western cash and African Union
troops from Somalia's mainly Christian neighbours.
The invasion also had the
effect, though, of turning al-Shabab into an all-out guerrilla movement,
divorced from its more moderate allies. It began a vicious insurgency against
the transitional government, and also seized control of much of Mogadishu and
swaths of southern Somalia, dreaming up edicts as ludicrous as anything imposed
by the Taliban.
Teenage girls would be
stoned to death for adultery, women were banned from wearing bras on the basis
that they showcased the chest, and in 2010 men were even forbidden from
watching the South Africa World Cup. For children, one of the few acceptable
forms of entertainment was Koranic recital contests, for which prizes would
include guns, grenades and land mines.
With the piety also came
hypocrisy. While publicly condemning the piracy industry that boomed in Somalia
from 2008, al-Shabab is also thought to have quietly taken fat slices of ransom
payments in exchange for turning a blind eye to buccaneers on their turf.
In the last two years, the
movement has been on the back foot, losing control of Mogadishu and alienating
even its own followers through its refusal to let foreign aid agencies operate,
a policy that caused a widespread famine.
But while its domestic
fortunes have waned, its international agenda has grown. During the 2010 World
Cup, al-Shabab bombers carried out their first major attack abroad, killing 74
people in an attack in Uganda, which contributed troops to Somalia's African
Union force. One al-Shabab leader said: ''What happened in Kampala is just the
beginning.''
Events over the weekend
have now proved him right. The fear now, though, is how it might end.
Colin Freeman is the Chief
Foreign Correspondent for the Sunday Telegraph.
No comments:
Post a Comment