Australia’s ABC News says on its Web site that Ben Zygier was Prisoner X, who died mysteriously in an Israeli prison cell.
On Tuesday, after an extensive Australian television report identifying
Prisoner X as an Australian father of two who became an Israeli spy, the
prime minister’s office summoned Israeli editors to a rare meeting to
remind them of the court order blocking publication of anything
connected to the matter.
It remains unclear what Prisoner X might have done to warrant such
extreme treatment — and such extreme secrecy, which human rights groups
have denounced as violating international law. What is clear is that the
modern media landscape makes the Israeli censorship system established
in the 1950s hopelessly porous: the Australian report quickly made the rounds on social media, prompting outraged inquiries from opposition lawmakers on the floor of Parliament.
“The Israeli public will know sooner or later what happened,” declared
Nahman Shai, a Parliament member from the Labor Party.
Aluf Benn, the editor of the Israeli daily Haaretz, said the government
forced him and another news organization to delete items about the
Australian reports from their Web sites on Tuesday. Later, Haaretz
posted an article on the unusual editors meeting and the parliamentary
discussion.
“They live in a previous century, unfortunately,” Mr. Benn said of the
Israeli administration. “Today, whatever is blocked in news sites is up
in the air on
Facebook walls and Twitter feeds. You can’t just make a
story disappear. I hope that they’re more updated in whatever they do
professionally.”
The prime minister’s office and prison service declined on Tuesday to
comment. “I can’t tell you anything; I’m not dealing with this,” said
the prison spokeswoman, Sivan Weizman. “I can’t answer any question
about it. Sorry.”
On Wednesday, the Israeli government partially lifted the gag order to
allow local media to publish reports quoting the foreign press, and
headlines quickly went up on Israeli Web sites.
Haaretz, which had splashed the story across the top of its print front
pages on Wednesday despite the ban, using articles about the
parliamentary inquiries and columns complaining about censorship,
published an instant package on its site: a news story in which
virtually every sentence was attributed to the Australian TV report; a
reaction piece from the Australian Jewish community; an article about an
Australian government inquiry into how its embassy in Tel Aviv handled
the matter; and two columns questioning Mossad practices. Its Web site
feature a photo of the dead man’s grave.
Ynet, the Web site that had published the items taken down under
government order in 2010, ran an article headlined, "’Dead Mossad Agent’
Affair Revealed."
The Jerusalem Post offered, "Report Reveals Alleged
Identity of Prisoner X,’ while the Times of Israel, another news site,
blared, "Canberra Simmers Over Report Australian Mossad Agent Killed
Self in Jail," noting the Australian government’s inquiry.
Maariv, a Hebrew daily, posted a picture of the dead prisoner, along
with articles about past Mossad scandals, the agency’s use of
Australians, and the American blogger who got it wrong.
Radio programs were filled with discussion of the story on Wednesday
morning, with media specialists and former judges discussing the
question of censorship and security in the Internet age.
The Australian report, a half-hour segment based on a 10-month
investigation that was broadcast Tuesday on the ABC News magazine
program “Foreign
Correspondent,” identified Prisoner X as Ben Zygier
and said he had used the name Ben Alon in Israel. Mr. Zygier immigrated
to Israel about a decade before his death at age 34, married an Israeli
woman and had two small children, according to the report.
JERUSALEM — The story had all the trappings of a spy thriller: an anonymous prisoner linked to Israel’s
secret service, Mossad, isolated in a top-security wing originally
built for the assassin of a prime minister. A suicide — or was it a
murder? — never officially reported. A gag order that barred journalists
from even acknowledging the gag order. And a code name to rival 007:
Prisoner X.
“ABC understands he was recruited by spy agency Mossad,” read a post on the Australian network’s Web site. “His incarceration was so secret that it is claimed not even guards knew his identity.” Mr. Zygier “was found hanged in a cell with state-of-the-art surveillance systems that are installed to prevent suicide,” it said, adding that guards tried unsuccessfully to revive him and that he was buried a week later in a Jewish cemetery in a suburb of Melbourne.
A spokeswoman for the Australian government said in an e-mail that its
embassy was unaware of the prisoner’s detention until his family asked
for help repatriating the remains, and that she could not “comment on
intelligence matters (alleged or actual).”
The Australian report builds on news items from 2010 that described the
death of Prisoner X in solitary-confinement cell 15 in a part of
Israel’s Ayalon Prison said to have been created especially for Yigal
Amir, who killed Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin in 1995. Prisoner X was
not allowed visitors or a lawyer, according to those reports.
Richard Silverstein, an American blogger, claimed in 2010 that Prisoner X was Ali-Reza Asgari, a former general in Iran’s
Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps and a government minister, who had
previously been reported to have defected to Israel and cooperated with
Western intelligence agencies. On Tuesday, Mr. Silverstein acknowledged his error, saying his source apparently was part of “a ruse designed to throw the media off the scent of the real story.”
Bill van Esveld, a Jerusalem-based analyst with Human Rights Watch, said
the reports suggested a serious violation of international law. “That’s
the most basic obligation you can think of, not disappearing people,”
he said. “You can’t take somebody into detention, deny any knowledge of
them, and not allow their families to be in communication with them, not
allow them to see a lawyer or have any due process. That’s what needs
to be looked into.”
Dov Hanin, a member of Parliament from the left-wing Hadash Party, on
Tuesday questioned Israel’s justice minister, Yaakov Ne’eman, about
Prisoner X, asking:
“Are there people whose arrest is kept a secret?
What are the legal monitoring mechanisms in charge of such a situation?
What are the parliamentary monitoring systems in charge of such a
situation? And how can public criticism exist in cases of such a
situation?”
Mr. Ne’eman replied that the matter did not fall under his jurisdiction,
but said, “There is no doubt that if true, the matter must be looked
into.”
Israel has long employed a military censor and refused to acknowledge certain operations, most recently its airstrike last month in Syria.
Most politicians here offer only winks and nods about Israel’s
well-known nuclear program, and Israeli journalists are left to quote
foreign news media reports about such things. Two weeks ago, Reporters
Without Borders ranked Israel 112th out of 179 countries on its annual press freedom index.
But even within that context, experts said the Prisoner X situation was extraordinary. They likened it to the case of Marcus Klingberg, a Soviet spy who was held in Israel for years under a false name.
“There are some episodes in the history of Israel that are still kept
under the strongest secrecy thick veil possible,” said Ronen Bergman, an
Israeli journalist and contributing writer for The New York Times
Magazine who is writing a book about the Mossad. “Some of them are 40
years old, 50 years old, and are still under thick, thick secrecy, and
anyone violating this secrecy would be thrown into jail himself.”
Mr. Bergman said he had information about Prisoner X but could not share
it because “so far the gag order is in motion and I’m an Israeli
citizen.” Three former directors of the Mossad also refused on Tuesday
to comment on the case.
“This is the topic you want to talk to me about? No way,” said Danny
Yatom, who headed the spy agency in the late 1990s and later served as a
Labor member of Parliament. “I don’t know if it is true or not. Even if
I would have known if it were true, I wouldn’t have talked about it.”
No comments:
Post a Comment