Search This Blog

Friday, December 20, 2013

Funding Opportunity - Creative Force: First call for applications year 2014 is now open

Funding Opportunity


The Swedish Institute’s Creative Force program has opened it’s firs call for applications of 2014 and welcomes applications for the funding of both seed and collaborative projects that aim to promote openness and democratic structures in the fields of culture, media and related sectors.

Countries in five geographic regions are included in the program: Africa, Eastern Europe, Western Balkans and Turkey, Middle East and North Africa and Russia. Individual countries included are listed on the website. The program is open to seed funding and collaborative  projects  between organizations in Sweden and in one or more of these regions and countries.

Application deadline: January 24, 2014.

More information is available at www.si.se/creativeforce

To apply directly go to instructions for application

We look forward to receiving your application!

Seed funding
Collaborative projects
The application form
Fill in our online application form. Instructions on how to fill the form are available on the application form. You can create and save an application, allowing you to review it before submitting it to the Swedish Institute.

After submitting your application, you will receive an email containing a reference number. This email will be sent to the email address of the person registered as the contact for the applicant organisation. Please refer to this number when contacting the Swedish Institute.

Supplementary information

Applications must be complete when submitted to SI. Supplementary information will only be accepted if it has been requested by the programme officer.

Changes in the project

Major changes in the project plan must always be communicated in writing and must be approved by the programme officer. Examples of such changes are a revised timetable or adjustments between budget items. Changes over 10% per budget item shall be approved by the programme officer. The change must be approved before it can be applied.

Please use the revised budget form to report budget changes.

Changes affecting the project objectives are not allowed.

Supplementary funding application

Applications for supplementary funding for projects already granted funds will not be considered.

For more information, please contact:

Judith Black, programme manager Creative Force Russia and Creative Force Eastern Europe

Lejla Hastor, programme manager Creative Force Western Balkans and Turkey

Katrine Larsen, programme manager Creative Force Africa and temoprary programme manager for Creative Force Middle East and North Africa


Source: si.se/creativeforce

Suxafiyiinta aan Xudduudda Lahayn oo ka Wersersan Xidhitaanada Suxafiyiinta Jabuuti


Hay'adda caalamiga ah ee ilaalada saxaafadda ee Saxafiyiinta aan Xudduudda Lahayn (RSF) ayaa Arbacadii (18-kii December) waxa ay dareen ka muujisay xariga afar saxafi oo lagu xiray Jabuuti tobankii maalmood ee la so dhaafay, iyada oo sheegay in xukuumaddu ay si isa soo taraysa saxafiyiinta ugu isticmaalayo qaabab colaadood.

Dhammaan saxafiyiinta la xiray ayaa u shaqeeya Codka Jabuuti, oo ah mareeg-wareed madax-bannaan.

"Qaabka loo fuliyay cadaadiskan qorshaysan waa mid lala yaabo kaliyana waxa uu ka dhigan yahay in saxafiyiinta laga xayuubiyay xoriyaddoodii caafimaadkoodiina halis la galiyay," ayay RSF ku tiri hadal ay soo saartay. "Saxafi ayaa la sii daayay maalin kadibna maalintii waxaa loo xiray sabab la'aan."

Sahal Cilmi Talan iyo Mustafa Cabdiraxamaan Xuseen ayaa la xiray 14-kii December iyaga oo ka warramaya suuqleey laga saarayo waddooyinka suuqa bartamaha Jabuuti. Waxa la sii daayay laba maalmood kadib.

Xuseen ayaa mar kale la xiray 17-kii December markii uu isku dayay in uu alaabtiisii ka soo qaato saldhigga bilayska Hodan oo ahaa kii markii hore lagu hayay. Mid ka mida askarta ayaa la sheegay in uu Xuseen ku dhuftay dhagta iyada oo warqadda dhakhtarka ee la siiyay lagu caddeeyay in dharbaaxadu dillaacisay xuubka dhagta.

December 12-keedii, ayay xukuumaddu xirtay Maxamed Ibraahim Wacays xilli uu ka warbixinyay dibad-bax ay sameeyeen haween laga soo saaray guryahoodii ku yiil mashruuc guriyayn oo ay dawladdu leedahay. Waxa loo dhaadhicayay xabsiga Gaboode 16-kii December.

Faarax Aabbadiid Xiladiid ayaa la xiray 7-dii December waxana la sii daayay isla maalintaa.

"Waxan ku baaqaynaa in si degdeg ah loo sii daayo Mustafa Cabdiraxmaan Xuseen iyo Maxamed Ibraahim Wacays oo si sharci-darro ah loo haysto kuna sugan xaalado halis ah," ayay tiri RSF.

Source: sabahionline

Thursday, December 19, 2013

Haween Dhalasho Ahaan Ka Soo Jeeda Xaafada Daami Ee Dagan Wadanka Dubia Oo Deeq Lacageed Soo Gaadhsiiyey Qoysas Rabshado Dhawaan Xaafadaasi Ka Dhacay Lagaga Gubay Guryo.


Mid ka mid ah qoysaskii Guryahooda la gubay xaafada Daami ee Hargeisa 12/12/2013
Hargeysa - Haween Dhalasho Ahaan Ka Soo Jeeda Xaafada Daami Ee Dagan Wadanka Dubia Oo Deeq Lacageed Soo Gaadhsiiyey Qoysas Rabshado Dhawaan Xaafadaasi Ka Dhacay Lagaga Gubay Guryo.

Lacagtan oo uu cadadkeedu dhamaa 666 dollar iyo afar buste oo loo soo wakiishay la taliyaha madaxweynaha barkhad jaamac xirsi iyo liibaan ismaaciil Maxamuud ayaa ay maanta si rasmi ah ugaadhsiiyeen dadkaas ay dhibaatadu haleeshay ee dagan xaafada daami ee magaalada hargaysa.
Munaasibadii lagu wareejinayay deeqdan oo lagu qabtay xaafada Daami
Hadaba wareejinta deeqdan oo lagu qabtay xaafada Daami ayaa waxa ugu horeyn halkaasi ka hadlay liibaan Ismaaciil Maxamuud waxaana uu yidhi?waxaanu joognaa xaafada daami waana guryihii habeenkii dhawaytoole la gubay waxaanu uwadanaa deeq cadadkeedu dhanyahay 666dollar Iyo bustayaal waxaan ugu soo deeqa walaalo muslimiin ah kan soo jeeda beesha gabooye oo ku dhaqan dalka Duba lacagtan aan maanta gacanto ku hayo waxaa loo qaybin doona afartii qoyse ee Guryaha laga gubay,waxaan umahad naqayaa walaalah maanta deeqdan soo gaadhsiiyey dadka xaafada daami ku tabaalaysan ee ubaahan in la caawiyo,waxa maanta waxa ilaahay loogu mahad naqo ah 13kii habeen ee aynu soo dhaafnay dhibtii ka dhacay iyo sidii ilaahay umadiisa ugu soo sahlay waxa dhibaato ah oo intan aan ka badnayeyna aanu ka dhicin.

Dhanka kale waxa isna halkaasi ka hadlay La taliyaha Madaxwaynaha Barkhad Jaamac Xirsi waxaana uu yidhi?dumarkaas jooga magaalada Dubia ee masuuliyada gaarka ah iska saaray  dadkaas dhibaatada gaarka ahi ku dhacday ee Cariish-yadoodi ka gubteen  ee dhaxamahaas magaalada hargaysa ka dhacaya la dhibanaa waxaanu leenahay dadkaasi soo caawiyey walaalahooda baahan ilaahay miisaanka xasanaadka ha idiin saaro ilaahay sadaqo joogta ah oo jaari ah ha idiinka dhigo sharaf ayey nootahay inaan maanta goob joog ka noqono lacagtii aad maanta soo dirteen  si qiimo badan oo amaano iyo karaamo ka muuqato cidii aad soo wakiilateen oo ah liibaan ismaaciil maxamuud sidii aad usoo wakiilateen ayuu idinku soo gaadhsiiyey.

Mar uu Barkhad Qurbajoogta beesha dardaaran udirayey ayaa waxa uu yidhi?waxaan ugu baaqaynaa qurba joogta kale ee jooga qurbaha in ay kasoo qayb qataan waxa tarkaas fiican ee ay haweenkaasi soo tareen dadka ku tabaalaysan xaafada daami, tanina noqon mayso deeqdii ugu horeysa ee tu-tan ka badan ayaanu sugaynaa oo nala soo gaadhsiin doono haday xukuumada tahay iyo haday tahay shacab reer somaliland.

Dhinaca kale dumarka iyagana la gaadhsiiyey deeqdan oo dagan xaafada ayaa uga mahad naqay sida wanaagsan ee ay usoo gaadhsiiyey taliyaha madaxweynaha barkhad jaamac xirsi iyo liibaan ismaaciil Maxamuud waxaan ilaahay ubaryeen dadkaas soo caawiyey inuu ilaahay miisaanka xasanaadka ugu daro uguna mahad naqay dumarkaas isasoo xil-qaamay.

Source: Hadhwanaagnew

SOMALIA: IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS - Puntland's Punted Polls - INTERNATIONAL CRISES GROUP

Violent fallout from a disputed presidential election would have implications for the rest of Somalia, including neighboring Somaliland, not least an increase in inter-clan tensions and opportunities for the extremist group Al-Shabaab to strengthen its foothold in north-east Somalia. 


“Despite the violence, risks and weak institutional framework, it is important that the democratic transition continue, especially at a local level”.
Comfort Ero, Crisis Group’s Africa Program Director




In its latest briefing, Somalia: Puntland’s Punted Polls, the International Crisis Group examines the attempt to reconcile clan interests with a democratic constitution for a regional administration whose development is important for establishing a degree of stability in a country that has not had much effective government for a generation. Hopes were once high that Puntland could be an example to Somalia’s other regions, but the democratic transition process has been mostly suspended due to increasing clan grievances and concerns over the weakness of political and judicial institutions charged with overseeing elections. If the election of the president by parliament next month is disputed, tensions could easily escalate to violence.

Puntland’s presidential election, scheduled for January, threatens to exacerbate clan tensions and polarise the population. To keep the regional state on the path of democratisation, deep investment from local, national and international actors will be crucial.

The briefing’s major findings and recommendations are:
  • Violent fallout from a disputed presidential election would have implications for the rest of Somalia, including neighboring Somaliland, not least an increase in inter-clan tensions and opportunities for the extremist group Al-Shabaab to strengthen its foothold in north-east Somalia.
  • Elections have always strained the clan consensus underwriting Puntland’s relative stability. Even after fifteen years, Puntland’s institutions remain weak and have failed to mediate the democratisation process. In the context of January’s presidential election, it is crucial to ensure the safety of all candidates and their freedom to campaign.
  • For Somalia as a whole, the Puntland experience demonstrates that instituting party-based democracy will be a contested process at every step, especially at the local (clan) level. Particular attention should be paid to the establishment of political parties. In Puntland as in the rest of Somalia, traditional clan authorities remain unconvinced of the benefits of party-based democracy.
  • Until the July crisis, when local elections were cancelled, the international community – particularly the UN, U.S., UK and EU – failed to recognise the importance of Puntland’s democratisation process for all Somalia. It needs now to promote an all-Puntland constitutional review process and support the restart of the democratic transition via both technical and symbolic assistance.
“Puntland has shown that democratisation is not just a technical process or a panacea for reducing internal conflict. Donors and other international actors need to be heedful of local political realities, including support of elites, robustness of institutions and viability of electoral districts, before giving support to an electoral process”, says Cedric Barnes, Crisis Group’s Horn of Africa Project Director. “This is especially relevant for the projected democratic transition in the rest of Somalia by 2016”.

“Despite the violence, risks and weak institutional framework, it is important that the democratic transition continue, especially at a local level”, says Comfort Ero, Crisis Group’s Africa Program Director. “Calling off the local elections in July was the right call, but has left many feeling excluded and without a direct voice, especially those from marginalised clans and the young. And it is these constituencies that are most likely to be attracted by radical Islamist groups like Al-Shabaab”.

Read full report here: Read full report (pdf)

Media for Liberty Award 2014, USA

The 2014 Media and Liberty Award is inviting online submissions from media contributors who have made outstanding entries between 1st January 2013 to 21 December 2013.The main aim of the award is to encourage media contributions that explore the relationship between economic liberty (freedom of individuals to make economic choices in a free-market environment) and political liberty (freedom from government intervention and fostering of civil liberties).

The topics of entries made may include Sovereign debt, cause or downfall of the common goods (food, housing, healthcare) becoming prohibitively expensive for the average consumer, ultimate impact of globalization and its impact on the middle class, the true cost of ethanol and its impact on food and fuel, dependency on foreign oil, fair trade, government involvement in private enterprise (TARP, health and financial reform), global tax and regulatory changes, access to healthcare (universal care, rationing, medicare) or any other topics that relate to economic and political liberty. The award is of $50,000 cash prize along with a trip to the award ceremony in Washington D.C. in spring 2014.7

Eligibility Criteria – 
  • Entries must be published or transmitted via print or electronic media between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2013 and must be an original work of the entrant. Eligible media outlets, including newspapers, magazines, journals, radio, television and websites, must be generally recognized in their markets and accessible to a broad audience in the United States.
  • Print entries may not exceed 20,000 words and electronic entries may not exceed 120 minutes.
  • Entries must be in English, or submitted with an English translation or with English subtitles originally published or transmitted between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2013.
  • Entries may include, but are not limited to, news reporting, feature coverage, investigative reporting, articles, essays, editorials, commentaries and documentaries. Programs produced and intended for general theatrical motion picture release are not eligible. Montage of speeches, news coverage, video footage, graphic content or similar entries will also not be accepted.
  • Entrant can be from anywhere in the world. She/he must be at least 21 years of age at the time of entry. Employees of Liberty Media (and its affiliates), their immediate families and those living in their household are not eligible.
Fill Media for Liberty Award Form to enter for the award.
Please visit Official Contest Rules for information regarding the prescribed format of the submission.
For more information, visit Official Media for Liberty Award page.

Mandela and the African liberation struggle

Ubuntu and the emancipation of humans everywhere
Those who branded Mandela as a terrorist are now seeking to program the minds of the youth to see him as some sort of messiah, without links to real struggles for peace. But Mandela was very clear that his life was linked to the collective struggles of humans everywhere
by Horace G. Campbell

On Thursday December 5, 2013 the people of South Africa lost one of the foremost freedom fighters and revolutionaries who made his mark on humans everywhere. Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela was born in South Africa in 1918 and matured as Africans in South Africa rose to the challenges posed by the most brutal social and economic system of that moment, the system called apartheid. Mandela has now joined the ancestors and he has left his mark beside those great humans (such as Mahatmas Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr, Rosa Parks, Umm Kulthum, Che Guevara and Rosa Luxemburg) whose greatness emerged from the movements that created them. The forms of struggle that emerged from South Africa inspired the refinement of the philosophy of Ubuntu. This is a philosophy that says one’s humanity is enriched by another’s and that as humans we are linked to a wider universe and spiritual world. Mandela had said clearly of Ubuntu, “The spirit of Ubuntu – that profound Africa sense that we are human beings only through the humanity of other human beings – is not a parochial phenomenon, but has added globally to our common search for a better world.”

The philosophy of Ubuntu challenged the ideals of individualism, greed, unhealthy competition, obscene self-enrichment and those destructive forms of human association that have brought the planet to the brink of extinction. When the movement elevated Nelson Mandela to the position as president of a politically free South Africa in 1994, after 27 years of incarceration, the political leadership of South Africa sought to give practical meaning to the philosophy of Ubuntu by establishing a Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC). In all parts of the world, the international media remember Mandela and his contributions to peace and reconciliation but the same corporate media seeks to confuse the youth by marketing Mandela as an unusual individual who performed the ‘miracle’ of ending apartheid. In the process of the wall to wall media coverage of the celebration of the life of Nelson Mandela, it is important that the voice of Africa is clear on the meaning of Mandela. Mandela was against racism and the dehumanizing social system that created hierarchies.

As peace activists it is vital that we remember Mandela as a defender of peace and social justice and the fact that he was an extraordinary human being. What is important to remember is that he was a product of a social movement; the extraordinary circumstances of the oppression of apartheid created this Mandela. Mandela joined a social movement, the anti-apartheid movement and for a moment in history, he became the symbol of the struggle against war and apartheid. His freedom came from the sacrifices of millions, especially the youth of Soweto and the workers from the Mass Democratic Movement who laid down a marker for the new tactics of revolution. While he was the President of South Africa, Mandela worked for peace in Burundi and Central Africa and worked hard to end the western manipulation of who can be branded as a terrorist.

Those who branded Mandela as a terrorist are seeking to program the minds of the youth to see him as some sort of visionary leader “dropped from heaven” without links to real struggles for peace. Mandela was very clear that his life was linked to the collective struggles of humans everywhere, and when he was released in February 1990 he said, “Amandla, Amandla ... I greet you all in the name of peace, democracy and freedom for all. I stand here before you not as a prophet but as a humble servant of you, the people.”

This media coverage of Nelson Mandela challenges contemporary freedom fighters to contemplate new tactics, new tools of struggles and new networks for peace in order to complete the tasks of ending global apartheid. The African National Congress in government has been trapped by its inheritance of the social capital of the apartheid state. New forms of organization and new ideas will be needed as humans gird themselves to fight against the nefarious forms of racism, exclusion and oppression that have been refined by global capital as unbridled capitalism seeks to turn our youths into mindless consumers. It is up to the youth to gird themselves for the new phase of internationalism and peace activism so that we can create the conditions for the inspiration presented by the life of Nelson Mandela to be grasped in all corners of the globe. Mandela lived a full life and we want to add to the tributes as we celebrate his life of struggle.

THE SOCIETY THAT CREATED NELSON MANDELA

As soon as it became clear that the most obscene forms of white supremacy could not survive after the massive resistance of peoples in all parts of the globe, international news programmers began to present Nelson Mandela as a visionary leader who single handedly ended apartheid. Books, films, documentaries, blogs and other mainstream media seek to present the changes in South Africa without reference to the reality that Nelson Mandela always represented a liberation movement. Inevitably, as the movement mobilized around the release of Nelson Mandela when he was incarcerated for 27 years, Mandela became a symbol of the anti-apartheid struggle. As the struggle matured in the final phase after his release from jail on February 11, 1990 the myth-making was developed as part of an election campaign. It is this myth-making that ensured the positive and the negative in the representation of Nelson Mandela to a generation that was not yet born when the liberation struggles were at the peak.

When Mandela was born in the village of Qunu, in the province that was called Cape Province, the Union of South Africa had been formed eight years earlier. The Union government had celebrated the crushing of the Bambata rebellions and in the face of the failure of open military rebellions by regional military forces, the African National Congress had been formed in 1912. Mandela grew up in South Africa in the turbulent period of the 1930s capitalist depression. It was in the midst of this depression when the capitalists of South Africa refined the repression of black mine workers and inculcated in white workers the idea that they (whites) were not workers but from a superior race. With the villages of South Africa and the wider region of Southern Africa providing cheap labour for the mines, mining capital reaped super profits at a moment when the instability in the international monetary system required a steady supply of gold from South Africa.

The royal families of the pre –Union society could not escape the effects of the deformities of segregation and dehumanization. Missionaries were deployed to teach sons of chiefs and it was from one of the missionaries that Mandela received the name Nelson because the missionaries had difficulties saying Rolihlahla. After this missionary education Mandela was sent to Fort Hare University and it was where the other famous anti-apartheid and anti-colonial stalwarts were groomed. Z. K. Matthews, Govan Mbeki, Oliver Tambo, Joshua Nkomo, Walter Sisulu, Robert Sobukwe, Desmond Tutu and Robert Mugabe were some of the notable students in the forties at this university. As an activist he was expelled from Fort Hare and he went on to study law at the University of Witwatersrand.

Nelson Mandela joined the African National Congress (ANC) in 1942 and in 1944, along with Walter Sisulu, Robert Sobukwe, and Oliver Tambo, they formed the Youth wing of the ANC. This youth wing joined the hundreds of anti-colonial movements all over the world and when the repressive legal structures of apartheid were formalised to support the social divisions, the peoples responded with a Freedom Charter. The Sharpeville massacres of March 21, 1960 foreclosed all possibilities of a peaceful non –violent opposition to apartheid and in 1962 Mandela was dispatched to the independent states of Africa to gain support for the armed wing of the ANC, Umkhonto we Sizwe (abbreviated as MK, translated as "Spear of the Nation). Mandela was one of the co-founders of MK and he received training in many African countries before he returned to South Africa. Mandela participated in the debates about unity and struggle that were at that time raging in the Pan African Freedom Movement for East and Central Africa (PAFMECA).

SELF ORGANIZATION OF THE YOUTH OF SOWETO

South West Johannesburg (Soweto) was one of those dormitory towns that were a reservoir of cheap labour for the rich and middle class whites in the suburbs of Johannesburg. Mandela was arrested in 1962 for planning “sabotage” of the government and was branded a terrorist by the South African state. The US military and intelligence agencies worked hand in glove with the apartheid military to crush opposition from the African majority. From 1973 the workers of Durban had given notice that there would be new organizational forms to oppose apartheid and the youth of Soweto followed with the massive uprisings of 1976. These rebellions are central to the kind of politics that developed in the period when Mandela was incarcerated after the Rivonia trials in 1964.

The sacrifices of the youth and their determination had created new alliances and these alliances matured in the Mass Democratic Movement and the United Democratic Front (UDF). While Nelson Mandela as a lawyer had been groomed to focus on the legal questions of the apartheid laws, the social questions of health, education, housing, police brutality placed the fight against apartheid on a new terrain as the ANC worked to remain alive in the heat of the conservative push of Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher. The formation of the UDF had provided for an alternative source of political power at the grassroots and strengthened the capacity of the resistance to transform their conception of the long term struggles to create an alternative to the social system.

Forward planners for the investors in the Johannesburg Stock Exchange were sufficiently alarmed when the rebellions of the youth rendered South Africa ungovernable and apartheid unworkable. After the killing of Steve Biko, the planners sought out the brightest from among these rebellious youth to send them to be trained as future leaders in North American and European universities. Those educated in the schools of the West became the experts after return to South Africa to be at the forefront of the negotiations for the form of society to be built after apartheid. Free Mandela Committees were an integral of the global antiapartheid struggles. In response to these local, regional and international alliances to end apartheid the South African Defence Forces (SADF) spread death and destruction in the townships and across the region of Southern Africa. The terrorism of apartheid along with the killing of more than 2 million in the neighboring states did not break the will of the people. If anything, international solidarity intensified with the support of the Cubans assisting the Angolans to fight the apartheid army at Cuito Cuanavale.

THE IMPORTANCE OF CUITO CUANAVALE

One of the many tasks of western propaganda organs has been to downplay the sacrifices of the peoples of the region of Southern Africa for the independence of Namibia 1990, the release of Nelson Mandela, and the negotiations to end apartheid. The epic battles at Cuito Cuanavale between October 1987 and June 1988 changed the history of Africa. The SADF had invaded Angola with the plan to impose Jonas Savimbi in Luanda and to defeat the freedom fighters from Namibia of the South West Africa People’s Organization (SWAPO). The apartheid army became bogged down at the crossroads of two rivers in southern Angola. In order to intimidate the peoples of Africa the SADF had manufactured tactical nuclear weapons with the assistance of the Israeli state. When the South African army became bogged down the President of South Africa, P.W.Botha, flew to the frontlines of the battles in Angola to broker a debate between the generals on whether South Africa should deploy and use its nuclear capabilities.

The international isolation of the white racist regime meant that there was no sympathy for this option, even from the conservative Reagan administration. The racist army had to fight against a confident Angolan military with Cuban reinforcements. After nine months fighting the SADF was roundly defeated with the remnants of the SADF retreating on foot to northern Namibia. In order to rescue the SADF so that the military would not be routed as the French army was routed at Dien Bien Phu in 1954, in stepped the US Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs, Chester Crocker, to broker the decent withdrawal of the SADF from Namibia. This battle was episodic and Fidel Castro rightly asserted that the history of Africa will be written as that of before Cuito Cuanavale and after Cuito Cuanavale.

NELSON MANDELA AND THE SOUTH AFRICAN STRUGGLES AFTER CUITO CUANAVALE

Nelson Mandela’s walk of Freedom out of incarceration in 1990 had represented a major step in the peoples of the world for a new system after apartheid. However, those who owned the banks, the mines, the insurance companies and the land were planning for a post-apartheid society where the capital remained in the hands of the white minority along with new black allies. International capital had grasped the full implications of black partners in societies such as Kenya, Zimbabwe, Cameroons, Algeria and Nigeria. Hence even while the negotiations were on going for the New Society in The Convention for a Democratic South Africa (CODESA,) the more far sighted elements such as the Oppenheimer family of Anglo-American Corporation worked to support those within the movement that believed that the end of Apartheid was for the development of a class of black entrepreneurs under Black Economic Empowerment (BEE).

The nature of the inequalities in South Africa today demonstrates the success of the plan to create black allies. Cyril Ramaphosa is the poster child of a militant trade union leader of the anti-apartheid era who became a mining magnate after apartheid, exploiting the very workers he had vowed to defend. The image of Cyril Ramaphosa who had escorted Nelson Mandela out of Prison in 1990 operating as a multibillionaire was one sign of the class formation in South Africa. In 2012, the political leaders of the ANC oversaw a government that shot 34 Marikana workers who were striking for better conditions at the Platinum Mines in South Africa. It was a proper clarification of the politics of transformation when Ramaphosa, a multibillionaire, emerged as the spokesperson for the owners of the Platinum Mines in rejecting the demands of the workers for better working conditions and better wages. The ANC and its tripartite alliance of the Communist Party, the Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU) had fashioned a theoretical basis for the enrichment of a few by arguing that before South Africa could enter the phase of transformation beyond capitalism there had to be the development of the productive forces. Nelson Mandela was caught in 1994 in the midst of the alliance and within five years sought to extricate himself by stepping down as President of South Africa in 1999 after one term.

Ubuntu in practice, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC)

One of the sterling contributions of the South African struggle was to be able to clarify the differences between restorative justice and retributive justice, based on Ubuntu. In fact, Mandela not only embraced Ubuntu, under his political leadership, there was an attempt to bring the ideas of Ubuntu from its philosophical level to the level of practical politics in ways that helped avert bloodbath to form a better society, however imperfect. And this was in part done through the establishment of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

In the three years after the release of Mandela, the international media was predicting a bloodbath in South Africa if blacks were to emerge victorious from the first democratic elections in 1994. Those with strategic control over the means of violence sought to make this bloodbath a reality right up to the moment when Mandela was inaugurated in May 1994 as the first black President of a democratic South Africa. One year after Mandela became president, the parliament of South Africa established the Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act No. 34 of 1995. This became the legal framework for the establishment of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and Mandela threw his international weight behind the process of reconciliation. While the TRC was holding sessions under the chairperson Desmond Tutu, Mandela made a number of public gestures to demonstrate the fact that he supported full reconciliation between the oppressed blacks and the oppressors. Of the two most public of these gestures were the visit to have tea with Mrs Betsie Verwoerd at Oriana in 1995 and donning the jersey of the segregated South African rugby team in the World Cup in South Africa.

Mrs Verwoerd, the widow of the architect of the most brutal apartheid structures, had retreated to the town of Orania in the Cape seeking to establish an all-white town because the whites could not live under a black political leadership. The extreme Afrikaners around Mrs Verwoerd had chosen the small community to set up a laager and the whites in the town did not want any black around, not even black servants. These whites did not recognize Mandela as the legitimate president of a free South Africa. Mandela took the bold step of travelling to this all white town of Orania to demonstrate to Mrs Verwoerd that the new South Africa was based on forgiveness and willingness to share, core principles of Ubuntu. This gesture was relayed all over the world by the local and international media as Mandela sat down to have tea with the people who were responsible for arresting and incarcerating him. Two months earlier Mandela had orchestrated another public act by going to the Rugby World Cup Match and putting on the jersey of the South African team. Sporting activities had been one of the strongest bases for segregation in the society and in all areas of sporting activity Mandela inspired South Africa to rise above the structural violence that had become part and parcel of South Africa.

At the legal level, South Africa’s post-apartheid constitution is one of the most progressive in the world, and it draws on Ubuntu to enshrine equal constitutional rights for all – black, white, colored, women, youths, elderly people and same-gender-loving persons.

This effort at reconciliation at the legal level and at the public level went side by side as the TRC started hearings in Cape Town in 1996. The mandate of the commission had been to bear witness to, record and in some cases grant amnesty to the perpetrators of crimes relating to human rights violations, as well as reparation and rehabilitation. Witnesses who were identified as victims of gross human rights violations were invited to give statements about their experiences, and some were selected for public hearings. Perpetrators of violence could also give testimony and request amnesty from both civil and criminal prosecution.

A new politics was being developed in the context of seeking restorative justice beyond the Nuremberg model of winners’ court. The healing power of the process was manifest in the rituals that emanated from victims and oppressors, creating a space that could be the basis of holding the society together. This ritual of the TRC with the spiritual underpinnings of forgiveness and healing was a powerful antidote to the three hundred years of white racist oppression. Malidoma Some had written a book on the Healing Wisdom of Africa: Finding Life Purpose Through Nature, Ritual, and Community. It was in the TRC where one saw some of the ideas being worked out. During the hearings of the TRC there were public hearings as the narratives of perpetrators and victims moved in a constant motion across time (from present to past and present to future) and space (spiritual, social, physical, emotional) in a movement that may be called recursive.

Here was a profound moment in the history of South Africa as the African people offered a crucible for healing the society. Nelson Mandela and Desmond Tutu will go down in history as individuals who opened up the possibilities for another form of society. This healing process offered by the TRC, despite its imperfections, placed Ubuntu on the philosophical map breaking the ideation baggage of individualism, greed, competition and revenge.

If the black people and the oppressed majority were willing to turn a corner, international capital was not. Plans for the reconstruction and transformation of South Africa were shelved in the face of the timidity of the political leadership in calling for the cancellation of the apartheid incurred debt. The repercussions of managing the neo-liberal programe of international capital cut off the top leadership of the ANC from the rank and file. Questions of the social reconstruction after apartheid had to be shelved until new emancipatory formations arise in South Africa. International capital took the lessons of South Africa to heart and sought to promote a neo-liberal agenda where a small minority collaborated with international capital in the new template for the exploitation of the majority. This form of class rule came to be understood as the globalization of apartheid without its racial baggage.

MANDELA AND UBUNTU OVERSEAS

Mandela was opposed to the western designation of states as sponsoring terrorism and openly supported Fidel Castro of Cuba, Yasser Arafat of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) the Saharwi Arab Democratic Republic and the political leadership in Libya. As one who had been placed on the US list of international terrorist, Mandela in 1992 made a clear statement about the standoff between Libya and the West over the downing of the 1988 Pan American Airways Flight 103. This plane had exploded over Lockerbie, Scotland, and the West accused two Libyans of planting the bomb. This is despite the fact that at the precise moment of the bomb, western media had blamed Iran for planting the bomb.

In 1998 Mandela travelled to Libya three times within one week to mediate between the British government and the Libyan authorities. After travelling back and forth between the western leaders and Muammar Gaddafi, the head of the Libyan state, Mandela struck a deal where Gaddafi handed over the two suspects in return for the lifting of international sanctions against Libya. Gaddafi accepted the offer of Nelson Mandela and offered to pay US $2.7 billion , approximately $10 million for each of the victim’s families. Gaddafi went further to open up his economy to western oil companies and in 2004 dumped his plans for the acquisition of chemical and biological weapons. Despite this opening and the intense investments of the west, international capital was not satisfied and in 2011 orchestrated the invasion, bombing and destruction of Libya under the banner of Responsibility to Protect. Gaddafi was executed and humiliated as the west sought to roll back all ideas of African unification and liberation.

Mandela as a Peace maker

After Nelson Mandela was rid of the responsibility of managing the structures of the apartheid economy, he became even more outspoken against inequalities. He was assertive on the question of the need for health for all and the provision of retroviral medicine for those affected by HIV AIDS even while other leaders of the ANC were equivocal over the response of the government of South Africa to this pandemic. Outside of South Africa Mandela shamed the leaders of the Organization of African Unity (OAU) who had stood by while the fastest genocide unfolded in Rwanda in 1994. After the passing of Julius Nyerere in 1999, Nelson Mandela engaged the peace process in Burundi and threw his considerable international stature behind a tough process of negotiations to end the decades of warfare in Burundi.

Mandela was opposed to the deployment of US military personnel in Africa and he spoke out firmly against the Africa Crisis Response Initiative (ACRI), the forerunner to the current Africa Command. When George W. Bush started his buildup for the war against the peoples of Iraq Mandela offered himself up as a peace maker to be a human shield against US bombs. In an interview with Newsweek magazine in 2002 prior to the invasion, Mandela called the USA a threat to the peace of the world.

“If you look at those matters, you will come to the conclusion that the attitude of the United States of America is a threat to world peace. Because what [America] is saying is that if you are afraid of a veto in the Security Council, you can go outside and take action and violate the sovereignty of other countries. That is the message they are sending to the world. That must be condemned in the strongest terms.”

As a peace activist, Mandela took issues personal with George Bush over the decision to invade Iraq. Addressing the International Women’s Forum in Johannesburg in 2003, a visibly furious Mandela stated unequivocally: “What I am condemning is that one power, with a president [George Bush] who has no foresight, who cannot think properly, is now wanting to plunge the world into a holocaust. ... If there is a country that has committed unspeakable atrocities in the world, it is the United States of America. They don't care.”

THE LEGACIES OF NELSON MANDELA

The differing legacies of the political leadership of Nelson Mandela were on full display at the massive memorial event held in Soweto on December 10, 2013. There the mass of people expressed themselves in the admiration and warmth of Nelson Mandela and at the same time expressing their opposition to the corruption of the top leadership of the ANC. The people booed the current leader of the ANC, Jacob Zuma, every time his face appeared on the giant TV screens in the stadium. Mandela had always remarked that he was a disciplined member of the ANC and his membership of the organization pointed to the differences between the promises of the anti-apartheid struggles and the realities of the enrichment of a new class of African exploiters. It was appropriate that this celebration of the life of Mandela marked a new stage for the corrupt leadership of the ANC.

In the period of the anti-apartheid struggles, funeral ceremonies were occasions for mass mobilization and education. The entire proceedings played out before over 90 heads of state and government reflected the new relationship between the ANC and the mass of the poor. Despite the fact that this occasion represented a huge logistical challenge, one could negatively compare the planning of the leadership on this occasion with the World Cup in 2010. Hence, for one of the most important public events in the history of South Arica, for most of the time the stadium was half empty. The ANC did not provide transportation to the stadium as promised. The poor travelled from near and far by train only to find that there were no buses to take them up to the stadium. Even those who braved the downpour of rain to make it to the stadium was not allowed to celebrate the way South Africans are used to celebrate at such events. Instead they were expected to sit and listen like little children. At such events people would sing and dance. In fact, before each speaker someone would raise a song and people would follow and sing until the speaker was ready to speak. Even Zuma would start a song and dance before he spoke. Jacob Zuma, the leadership and Cyril Ramaphosa wanted the people to forget the kind of mass mobilization that was engineered to end apartheid. They are afraid that this mass mobilization would sweep the billionaires from power.

The political leadership of Nelson Mandela in the anti-apartheid struggle had both focused attention on him as an individual and released the energies of various groups whose task was to clarify the details of the real meaning of transformation beyond apartheid. In this and in many other ways, Nelson Mandela symbolized the dialectic of resistance and transformation. His own life has mirrored the way in which a social movement shaped individuals. Hence, the youth who are hearing the tributes to Mandela are faced with the contradiction between focusing on great leaders and the kind of media coverage that is geared towards the depoliticizaion of the youth. Richard Falk summed up very lucidly the place of Mandela for humans everywhere when he wrote,

“It was above all Mandela’s spiritual presence that created such a strong impression of moral radiance on the part of all of us fortunate enough to be in the room. I was reinforced in my guiding belief that political greatness presupposes a spiritual orientation toward the meaning of life, not necessarily expressed by way of a formal religious commitment, but always implies living with an unconditional dedication to values and faith that transcend the practical, the immediate, and the material.”

In his earthly life, Mandela could not escape this tension between the spiritual and the material. The spiritual energies of the peoples had been unleashed to fashion a non-racial democracy. Liberal conception of democracy could not understand this attempt to transcend the ideas of the Western Enlightenment, which itself is built on human hierarchies that carved a supreme space for the enlightened white man. Nelson Mandela had been reared in these ideas at Fort Hare and as a lawyer but the struggles elevated him to be a special human being among revolutionaries. The world salutes Nelson Mandela and we join with those who are sending tributes to his family.

We will also add that the people should not mourn but organize for the next round of struggle.

* Horace G .Campbell, a veteran peace activist is a Visiting Professor in the School of International Relations, Tsinghua University, Beijing. He is a Professor of African American Studies and Political Science at Syracuse University. He is the author of Global NATO and the Catastrophic Failure in Libya, Monthly Review Press, 2013.

Wednesday, December 18, 2013

Bishop Bertin: we must continue to respond to the tragedies of Somalia


(Vatican Radio) Somalia, on the tip of the horn of Africa, is widely seen as a nation ravaged by drought and conflict, at the top of the global corruption index, home to gangs of warlords who sabotage humanitarian aid efforts and one of the most dangerous places in the world for journalists and aid workers.

But a September conference in Brussels, the third of its kind, aimed to focus the attention of the international community on the progress made in Somalia over the last year as well as mobilize resources for the one-year-old Somali regime and assist it in the country’s reconstruction.

The conference set out a plan for Somalia’s reconstruction and has been successful in receiving over 815 million US dollars in financial pledges.

Meanwhile, Al-Shabaab Islamist militia have abandoned their posts in Mogadishu spurring hope that the new government will guarantee a more efficient management of food aid, with the support of the international community and the protection of African Union forces.

Vatican Radio’s Linda Bordoni asked Bishop Giorgio Bertin of Djibouti, Apostolic Administrator of Somalia’s only Catholic diocese, Mogadishu, if life has improved for ordinary Somalis…

Listen to the interview… RealAudioMP3

Bishop Bertin says that life is returning to Somalia very slowly, however, he says, although there is a sense of hope “the enemies of hope, the enemies of peace, the enemies of reconciliation are still there”.

The Bishop says that “the answer is that we should be more perseverant than the evil forces. Those who opt for life, for hope, for respect should be more determined and persevering than those who are against it”.

Bertin says that Pope Francis’s option for the poor is a great source of inspiration for him. “It reminds of our engagement for the poor, an engagement that should be intelligent in the sense that we should find out the economic, political and not only humanitarian ways to come out of extreme poverty”..

He says it is also about keeping awareness high and points out that Somalia is a forgotten nation, in the news only when a tragic event hits the headlines.

Source: en.radiovaticana.va

If a Drone Strike Hit an American Wedding, We'd Ground Our Fleet


 But after a dozen or more deaths at a Yemeni wedding, don't expect anything to change. 


By Conor Friedersdorf 

On my wedding day, my wife and I hired a couple of shuttle vans to ferry guests between a San Clemente hotel and the nearby site where we held our ceremony and reception. I thought of our friends and family members packed into those vehicles when I read about the latest nightmarish consequence of America's drone war: "A U.S. drone mistakenly targeted a wedding convoy in Yemen's al-Baitha province after intelligence reports identified the vehicles as carrying al Qaeda militants," CNN reported, citing government sources in Yemen. "The officials said that 14 people were killed and 22 others injured, nine in critical condition. The vehicles were traveling near the town of Radda when they were attacked."

Can you imagine the wall-to-wall press coverage, the outrage, and the empathy for the victims that would follow if an American wedding were attacked in this fashion? Or how you'd feel about a foreign power that attacked your wedding in this fashion?

The L.A. Times followed up on the story and found slightly different casualty figures: "The death toll reached 17 overnight, hospital officials in central Bayda province said Friday. Five of those killed were suspected of involvement with Al Qaeda, but the remainder were unconnected with the militancy, Yemeni security officials said."

More than a dozen dead, many more injured, and an unknown number of survivors whose lives have suddenly taken a nightmarish turn the likes of which we cannot imagine, and all for the sake of five people suspected of ties to al-Qaeda. How many actual al-Qaeda terrorists would we have to kill with drones in Yemen to make the benefits of our drone war there outweigh the costs of this single catastrophic strike? If U.S. drone strikes put American wedding parties similarly at risk would we tolerate our targeted-killing program for a single day more? Our policy persists because we put little value on the lives of foreign innocents. Even putting them through the most horrific scene imaginable on their wedding day is but a blip on our media radar, easily eclipsed by a new Beyonce album.

The Obama Administration dishonestly talks of "surgical" drone strikes, as if surgeries ever result in double digit casualties. "Before any strike is taken, there must be near-certainty that no civilians will be killed or injured—the highest standard we can set," President Obama promised back in May. The CNN story about this latest strike says, "The convoy consisted of 11 vehicles, and the officials said that four of the vehicles were targeted in the strikes." Is attempting to pick off alleged militants while in a wedding convoy with innocents the highest standard we can set to avoid civilian deaths? If so, the results speak for themselves.
In that same May speech, Obama said:
Remember that the terrorists we are after target civilians, and the death toll from their acts of terrorism against Muslims dwarfs any estimate of civilian casualties from drone strikes.  So doing nothing is not an option.  Where foreign governments cannot or will not effectively stop terrorism in their territory, the primary alternative to targeted lethal action would be the use of conventional military options. As I’ve already said, even small special operations carry enormous risks. Conventional airpower or missiles are far less precise than drones, and are likely to cause more civilian casualties and more local outrage. 
And invasions of these territories lead us to be viewed as occupying armies, unleash a torrent of unintended consequences, are difficult to contain, result in large numbers of civilian casualties and ultimately empower those who thrive on violent conflict.      
Does anyone believe that, if not for our lethal drone program, the United States would've sent the Air Force or ground troops to fire on this wedding party? The thousands of drone strikes we've carried out in recent years suggest that drones decrease the cost of lethal action so much that the U.S. takes it more often now than we would if we didn't have a drone fleet at the ready—and not, as their defenders sometimes argue, that drones are saving us from air strikes and ground invasions.

Finally, Obama says that drone strikes are ordered only against targets who pose "a continuing, imminent threat to Americans." Is anyone else skeptical that the targets in this wedding convoy would be immenently attacking us right now if not for those Hellfire missiles? (For more on how Obama uses the word imminent in a misleading way see here.)

Even if you disagree with the growing global opposition to America's targeted-killing program, and believe that the frequent use of lethal drone strikes is necessary, reflect on the U.S. reaction to killing more than a dozen people in this wedding convoy, including many innocents. The moral course, if we must have a drone program that puts civilians at risk, would be to apologize for any terrible mistakes that we make, pay reparations to the wronged survivors, and explain what steps will be taken to insure nothing like this will ever happen again. Instead, according to CNN, "U.S. officials declined to comment on the report."

Source: theatlantic.com

SOMALIA: Exclusive: inside an al-Shabaab training camp



Jamal Osman Reporter
by Jamal Osman Reporter

Among the most feared of al-Qaeda's affiliates, al-Shabaab was behind the Westgate shopping mall attack in Kenya. Jamal Osman attended one of its training camps in the Somali bush.



They chant: "We are al-Shabaab! We are al-Qaeda! We are terrorists!" In a secret location, deep in the Somali bush, I met al-Shabaab, one of the most feared al-Qaeda-affiliated organisations in the world.


Around 300 newly trained fighters, who have completed a six-month course, parade in the training camp.

Al-Shabaab is the jihadist group behind the attack at the Westgate shopping mall in Kenya two months ago that left 67 people dead. The terrifying images from that attack showed al-Shabaab fighters casually walking through the mall as they shot civilians. But for al-Shabaab, the Westgate operation was a victory and is now being used to inspire new soldiers.

The latest recruits had the same military training as the Westgate attackers. At their graduation ceremony, they were rewarded with a visit from al-Shabaab's spokesman, Sheikh Ali Dhere.



Speaking to the new recruits, Sheikh Ali Dhere said: "See what the Kenyans are facing today. Men were like you, had the same training as you, gave up their lives for God's cause and brought huge victory for Muslims."

'Stop fighting us'

The men comprise young Muslims from all over the world: Arabs, Kenyans and even, I was told, some from Britain. They chanted in several languages, but I wasn't allowed to speak to them.

The group was one of two fully armed battalions I saw during my stay. They are determined men who want to crush the western-backed Somali government in Mogadishu. The weak government is propped up by African Union troops, including Kenyan forces who invaded southern Somalia two years ago. That is why al-Shabaab regard the Westgate attack as revenge.

We have said to Kenya many times: stay away from us. They refused. So we decided to spill blood to send the message. Sheikh Ali Dhere

Sheikh Ali Dhere, the public face of the group, told me: "We have said to Kenya many times: stay away from us, leave our land, our people and stop fighting us. We warned them again and again. They refused all of that. So we decided to spill blood to send the message.

"Their women are not better than ours. Their sons are not better than ours. Their children are not better than ours. When they kill our people we kill theirs."

Some of the new soldiers at the graduation ceremony showed off their gymnastic skills to impress Sheik Ali Dhere.

Suicide waiting list

Highly organised, these latest additions will soon decide which unit within al-Shabaab to join. They can remain regular fighters, become bomb-makers or work for the Amniyat, al-Shabaab's security network.

But the most popular unit is the Istishhadyin unit, the suicide brigade. And believe it or not, there's a long waiting list of several years. With months of training, only the best recruits will be accepted.

Sheikh Ali Dhere had a message for those wanting to join.

"When we fight and are martyred, we hope to be with God in paradise. What are the infidels hoping for? Nothing."

Alternative government

Al-Shabaab has been designated as a terrorist organisation by several western nations. And after losing control of four major cities, the Islamists were thought to have been defeated. But they still control large parts of the country and see themselves as an alternative government.

I visited Bulo Burte, a key strategic crossing point on the Shabelle river. It's an al-Shabaab stronghold.

When we fight and are martyred, we hope to be with God in paradise. What are the infidels hoping for? Nothing. Sheikh Ali Dhere

It also happens to be the town where one of the Westgate attackers came from. The number and identities of the Westgate attackers still remains a mystery. Kenyans claim they were only four. But locals in the al-Shabaab areas suggest there were more and some are even believed to have returned to Somalia.

The spokesman said Westagte was "something that happened at the heart of their country, and they still don't know whether the men have escaped or not and how many they were. That shows their weakness."

'Victory is close'

Unlike other parts of southern and central Somalia, there's peace under al-Shabaab's strict sharia law. Women do go to school and are allowed to run their own businesses.

I followed the Hizbat, the al-Shabaab police, on their beat. The first stop was a restaurant, where they told the female owner to remove the rubbish from outside. They then made their way to the local hospital, where they checked the pharmacy and the cleanliness of the rooms. They seem satisfied. Our final stop was a mini supermarket where they checked product expiry dates.

But as soon as they heard the call to prayer, everything stopped. People headed to the mosque for midday prayer, whether they liked it or not. The al-Shabaab police made sure that everyone went to the mosque.

Passing vehicles are pulled over.

The mosque quickly fills up, with some having to pray outside in the heat. It's a good opportunity for Sheikh Ali Dhere - this time in civilian clothes - to drum up more support.

"It's you who are meant to deal with the infidels," he tells the congregation. "It's you who should defend Islam. God willing, we'll be victorious. Victory is close. The infidels haven't got much left. They are in the eleventh hour."

Source: channel4.com

South Sudan quashes coup attempt, says President Kiir



Hundreds of people arrived at UN bases in Juba on Monday as reports of violence spread
President Salva Kiir: "The government is in full control of the security situation in Juba"

South Sudan's President Salva Kiir says an attempted coup by soldiers loyal to his former deputy Riek Machar has been put down.

Mr Kiir said the government was in full control of the capital, Juba, after a night of heavy fighting between soldiers in the presidential guard.

A night time curfew has been put in place and a number of arrests have reportedly been made.

Several people were reported injured and hundreds have fled to a US base.

Hilde Johnson, the UN's special representative in the country, said she was "deeply concerned" and urged "all parties in the fighting to cease hostilities immediately and exercise restraint".

"I have been in touch regularly with the key leaders, including at the highest levels to call for calm," she said.

The fighting in Juba broke out overnight, and intensified in the early morning, with reports of continuous gunfire and several explosions.

The city's airport has been closed and the state TV channel SSTV went off air for several hours.

Shortly after it came back on air, SSTV broadcast an address from Mr Kiir, wearing military uniform rather than his usual civilian clothing and flanked by government officials.

He said the violence "was an attempted coup", but that the government was now in full control and the attackers were being chased down.

He said the fighting began when unidentified uniformed personnel opened fire at a meeting of SPLM, followed by an attack on army headquarters near the university carried out "by a group of soldiers allied to the former vice-president Dr Riek Machar and his group".

"I will not allow or tolerate such incidents once again in our new nation. I strongly condemn these criminal actions in the strongest terms possible," he said, vowing those responsible would be have to stand "before the appropriate law institution".

The UN said it would protect civilians and provide basic humanitarian needs, but called for calm
The ruling party, former rebel force the Sudan People's Liberation Movement (SPLM), would never allow power to be transferred by force, he said.

He announced a curfew would be in place every night between 18:00 and 06:00, beginning on Monday.

"Rest assured that the government is doing all it can to make sure that citizens are secured and safe."

Foreign Minister Barnaba Marial Benjamin told the Associated Press that some soldiers had tried to raid the weapons store at the main military based in the capital, but were repulsed.

He said some politicians had since been arrested.

Mr Riek has not commented and his whereabouts are unclear. But his spokesman said he was safe and denied reports he had been arrested.

Civilians flee

South Sudan - the world's youngest country and one of the least developed - has struggled to achieve a stable government since becoming independent from Sudan in 2011. The independence referendum was intended to end a decades-long conflict, led by the SPLM, against the north.

The oil-rich country is ethnically and politically divided, with many armed groups active. Tensions have been particularly high since President Kiir dismissed his entire cabinet, including Mr Machar, in July.

The sackings are believed to have followed a power struggle - Mr Machar has said he plans to contest the presidential elections in 2015. He now leads a dissident faction within the SPLM.

The two men are from rival ethnic groups that have clashed in the past. Mr Kiir is from the Dinka community, the largest in South Sudan, while Mr Machar is from the Nuer, the second-largest. Some Nuer have complained about Dinka political domination.

Juba was reportedly calm by mid-morning with few civilians on the streets, but heavily armed troops were seen patrolling.

Hundreds of people, mainly women and children, have taken shelter at the UN compound near the airport and at a UN house in the city.

A spokesman told Reuters seven people, including a two-year-old boy, had been treated for gunshot wound.

The UN said in a statement: "We hope the security situation in Juba will quickly normalise to enable the civilians to return very soon to their residential areas. To that end, UNMISS (the UN mission in South Sudan) calls on all parties to show continued calm and restraint."

The UN and the US embassy advised their citizens to stay at home. Both denied rumours they were harbouring any political or military figures.
Both Sudan and the South are reliant on their oil revenues, which account for 98% of South Sudan's budget. But the two countries cannot agree how to divide the oil wealth of the former united state. Some 75% of the oil lies in the South but all the pipelines run north. It is feared that disputes over oil could lead the two neighbours to return to war.
Although they were united for many years, the two Sudans were always very different. The great divide is visible even from space, as this Nasa satellite image shows. The northern states are a blanket of desert, broken only by the fertile Nile corridor. South Sudan is covered by green swathes of grassland, swamps and tropical forest.



Sudan's arid north is mainly home to Arabic-speaking Muslims. But in South Sudan there is no dominant culture. The Dinkas and the Nuers are the largest of more than 200 ethnic groups, each with its own languages and traditional beliefs, alongside Christianity and Islam.
The health inequalities in Sudan are illustrated by infant mortality rates. In South Sudan, one in 10 children die before their first birthday. Whereas in the more developed northern states, such as Gezira and White Nile, half of those children would be expected to survive
The gulf in water resources between north and south is stark. In Khartoum, River Nile, and Gezira states, two-thirds of people have access to piped drinking water and pit latrines. In the south, boreholes and unprotected wells are the main drinking sources. More than 80% of southerners have no toilet facilities whatsoever.
Throughout the two Sudans, access to primary school education is strongly linked to household earnings. In the poorest parts of the south, less than 1% of children finish primary school. Whereas in the wealthier north, up to 50% of children complete primary level education


Conflict and poverty are the main causes of food insecurity in both countries. In Sudan, many of the residents of war-affected Darfur and the border states of Blue Nile and South Kordofan, depend on food aid. The UN said about 2.8m people in South Sudan would require food aid in 2013. The northern states tend to be wealthier, more urbanised and less reliant on agriculture.
Source: BBC