Search This Blog

Tuesday, October 1, 2013

Top 6 Countries That Grew Filthy Rich From Enslaving Black People

Spain


Starting in 1492, Spain was the first European country to colonize the New World, where they established an economic monopoly in the territories of Florida and other parts of North America, Mexico, Trinidad, Cuba and other Caribbean islands. The native populations of these colonies were mostly dying from disease or enslavement, so the Spanish were forced to increasingly rely on African slave labor to run their colonies.

The money generated from these settlements created great wealth for the Hapsburg and Bourbon dynasties throughout Spain’s hold on the area. But it also attracted Spain’s European rivals, prompting Spanish rulers to spend the riches from the Americas to fuel successive European wars.

Spanish treasure fleets were used to protect the cargo transported across the Atlantic Ocean. The ships’ cargo included  lumber, manufactured goods, various metal resources and expensive luxury goods including silver, gold, gems, pearls, spices, sugar, tobacco leaf and silk.
Port cities in Spain flourished. Seville, which had a royal monopoly on New World trade, was transformed from a provincial port into a major city and political center.  Since the Spanish colonists were not yet producing their own staples such as wine, oil, flour, arms and leather, and had large financial reserves to pay for them, prices in Castile and Andalusia rose sharply as traders bought up goods to ship out.

Prices of oil, wine and wheat tripled between 1511 and 1539. The great vineyards of Jerez, the olive groves of Jaén, and the arms and leather industry of Toledo were established on their present scale during these years.

France


With over 1,600,000 enslaved Africans transported to the West Indies, France was clearly a major player in the trade. Its slave ports were a major contributor to the country’s economic advancements in the 18th century. Many of its cities on the west coast, such as Nantes, Lorient, La Rochelle, and Bordeaux, built their wealth through the major profits of triangular slave trade.
Between 1738 and 1745, from Nantes, France’s leading slave port,  55,000 slaves were taken to the New World in 180 ships. From 1713 to 1775, nearly 800 vessels in the slave trade sailed from Nantes.

By the late 1780s, French Saint Domingue, which is modern-day Haiti, became the richest and most prosperous colony in the West Indies, cementing its status as a vital port in the Americas for goods and products flowing to and from France and Europe.

The income and taxes from slave-based sugar production became a major source of the French national budget. Each year over 600 vessels visited the ports of Haiti to carry its sugar, coffee, cotton, indigo, and cacao to European consumers.

Netherlands


The Dutch West India Company, a chartered company of Dutch merchants, was established in 1621 as a  monopoly over the African slave trade to Brazil, the Caribbean and North America.
WIC had offices in Amsterdam, Rotterdam, Hoorn, Middelburg and Groningen, but one-fourth of Africans transported across the Atlantic by the company were moved in slave ships from Amsterdam. Almost all of the money that financed slave plantations in Suriname and the Antilles came from bankers in Amsterdam, just as many of the ships used to transport slaves were built there.

Many of the raw materials that were turned into finished goods in Amsterdam, such as sugar and coffee, were grown in the colonies using slave labor and then refined in factories in the Jordaan neighborhood.

Revenue from the goods produced with slave labor funded much of The Netherlands’ golden age in the 17th century, a period renowned for its artistic, literary, scientific, and philosophical achievements.

Slave labor created vast sources of wealth for the Dutch in the form of precious metals, sugar, tobacco, cocoa, coffee and cotton and other goods, and helped to fund the creation of Amsterdam’s beautiful and famous canals and city center.

Portugal


Portugal was the first of all European countries to become involved in the Atlantic slave trade.  From the 15th to 19th century, the Portuguese exported 4.5 million Africans as slaves to the Americas, making it Europe’s largest trafficker of human beings.

Slave labor was the driving force behind the growth of the sugar economy in Portugal’s colony of Brazil, and sugar was the primary export from 1600 to 1650. Gold and diamond deposits were discovered in Brazil in 1690, which sparked an increase in the importation of African slaves to power this newly profitable market.

The large portion of the Brazilian inland where gold was extracted was known as the Minas Gerais (General Mines). Gold mining in this area became the main economic activity of colonial Brazil during the 18th century. In Portugal, the gold was mainly used to pay for industrialized goods such as textiles and weapons, and to build magnificent baroque monuments like the Convent of Mafra.

The United States of America

Slavery transformed America into an economic power. The exploitation of black people for free labor made the South the richest and most politically powerful region in the country. British demand for American cotton made the southern stretch of the Mississippi River the Silicon Valley of its era, boasting the single largest concentration of the nation’s millionaires.
But slavery was a national enterprise. Many firms on Wall Street such as JPMorgan Chase, New York Life and now-defunct Lehman Brothers made fortunes from investing in the slave trade the most profitable economic activity in New York’s 350 year history. Slavery was so important to the city that New York was one of the most pro-slavery urban municipalities in the North.

Sunday, September 29, 2013

Weerarkii Westgate Mall Nairobi Oo Hogaaminayay Sarkaal Ka Tirsnaaa Ciidamada Kenya


Telefishinka Channel 4 ayaa sheegay in la ogaaday in weerarkii xarunta ganacsiga ee Westgate Mall uu hoggaamiye ka ahaa nin u dhashay dalka Kenya oo horay uga tirsanaa ciidamada gaarka ah ee dalkaas.

Revealed_Westgate_terrorNinkan oo lagu macaabo Cumar ayaa la sheegay inuu ahaa masiixi balse uu diinta Islaamka qaatay sannado dambe, isagoo tababar ku qaatay saldhig ay Al-shabaab ku leedahay deegaanka Raas-kambooni ee gobolka Jubbada Hoose.

Cumar ayaa la sheegay inuu sannadkii 2005 safar ku yimid Soomaaliya oo uu ku biiray Al-sbabaab, isagoo dib ugu laabtay Kenya, kaddib muddo badan oo uu tababare u ahaa xoogagga Al-shabaab ee Soomaaliya.

Ilo wareedyo ayaa sheegay in isaga iyo ruux kale oo Somali ah ay hormuud  u ahaayeen weerarkii Westgate Mall kaasoo ay ku dhinteen in ka badan 76 qof oo ay ku jiraan ciidamada Kenya iyo shank a mid ah kooxihii weerarka geystay.

Ninka Soomaaliga ah ayaa la sheegay in lagu magacaabo Khadab uuna ka mid ahaa dadka ganacsiga ku haystay xaafadda Islii ee magaalada Nairobi halkaasoo ay daggan yihiin Soomaalida ku nool xarunta dalka Kenya.

Khadab ayaa la sheegay in lagu xiray Soomaaliya ayna jirdil u geysteen ciidammo ka tirsan sirdoonka Mareykanka ee CIA-da oo Muqdihso ku leh saldhig ay baaritaannada ku sameeyaan.

Wararka ayaa sheegaya in markii la xirayay Khadaab uu ka yimid deegaan ay maamusho Al-shabaab, inkastoo markii dambe la iska sii daayay, isagoo u wareegay magaalada Nairobi ee xarunta dalka Kenya.

Dowladda Kenya weli kama aysan hadlin warkan ku saabsan in weerarkii Westgate Mall uu hoggaaminayay nin u dhashay dalka Kenya oo ka mid ahaa Xarakada Al-shabaab, inkastoo ay horay u soo baxeen warar lagu sheegay inay weerarkaas hoggaaminaysay haweeney u dhalatay Britain.

Afhayeen u hadlay Al-shabaab ayaa horay u sheegay in weerarkaas ay iyagu abaabuleen ayna fuliyeen dagaalyahanno ka tirsan xoogaggooda oo horay loogu diyaariyay magaalada Nairobi ee xarunta dalka Kenya.

Saturday, September 28, 2013

US warns its citizens against travel to Kenya


The US further warned that there will be more attacks in Nairobi and Mombasa targeted at US nationals, Kenyans and those from other Western countries/FILE
By JUDIE KABERIA

NAIROBI, Kenya, Sep 28 – The United States of America has warned its citizens against travelling to Kenya after the September 21 terror attack.

In a statement, the US Department of State told Americans that Kenya was insecure due to threats by terrorists.

“US citizens in Kenya, and those considering travel to Kenya, should evaluate their personal security situation in light of continuing and recently heightened threats from terrorism and the high rate of violent crime in some areas. The levels of risk vary throughout the country,” it warned.

The US further warned that there will be more attacks in Nairobi and Mombasa targeted at US nationals, Kenyans and those from other Western countries

“The US government continues to receive information about potential terrorist threats aimed at US, Western, and Kenyan interests in Kenya, including in the Nairobi area and in the coastal city of Mombasa,” the Department of State said.

According to the communication, the attacks could be in form of “suicide operations, bombings, kidnappings, attacks on civil aviation and maritime vessels in or near Kenyan ports.”

It expressed fears that most of the terrorists involved in past attacks are still free and are likely to plan more attacks.

“Although the pursuit of those responsible for previous terrorist activities continues, many of those involved remain at large and still operate in the region,” the US warned.

The department indicated that its advisory issued on July 5 in 2013 to US citizens, still stands that Kenya is insecure.

It noted that last Saturday’s attack was masterminded by the suspected Al Shabaab terrorist group and killed many people from different nationalities.

The US explained that the attacks by Al Shabaab are inspired by Kenya’s invasion in Somalia which was intended to fight the terror group.

According to the US, the group will continue fighting back in revenge.

“Kenya initiated military action against al-Qaeda affiliate Al Shabaab by crossing into Somalia on October 16, 2011, and on June 2, 2012, signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) whereby it formally joined the African Union Mission in Somalia (AMISOM). In response to the Kenyan intervention, Al Shabaab and its sympathizers have conducted retaliatory attacks against civilian and government targets in Kenya,” The US explained.

America is worried that the number of attacks on Kenya by Al Shabaab has increased since Kenya invaded Somalia in October, 2011.

“More than two dozen of these attacks occurred in North Eastern Province, mainly in Dadaab, Wajir, Garissa, and Mandera. Four attacks occurred in Mombasa. Twelve grenade and improvised explosive device attacks have occurred in Nairobi, illustrating an increase in the number of attacks and an advance in the sophistication of attacks,” it explained.

Due to frequent attacks in various parts of the country especially North Eastern, the US warned its citizens not to travel to the North Eastern part of Kenya.

“US Embassy personnel are prohibited from travelling to the North Eastern Province, including the cities of El Wak, Wajir, Garissa, Mandera, and Liboi. US Embassy personnel are also restricted from travelling to the coastal area north of Pate Island, including Kiwayu and north to Kiunga on the Kenya/Somalia border.”

The US however told its citizens that most tourist destinations are safe; “there are no restrictions on US embassy employee travel to Kenya’s most popular tourist destinations such as Masai Mara, Amboseli, Lake Nakuru, Tsavo, Lamu Island, Hell’s Gate, Samburu, Mount Kenya, Malindi, and Nairobi.”

However they warned that other smaller crimes like robberies and carjacking can happen anywhere in the country.

The advisory came even as the Kenyan authorities pleaded with the international community not to issue travel advisories likely to hurt Kenyan’s tourist industry.

Last Sunday, President Uhuru Kenyatta and former Prime Minister Raila Odinga appealed to the international community not to issue travel advisories following the Westgate mall attack saying terrorism is a global challenge affecting the entire world.

There have been indications that some of the attackers of the Westgate mall include British and American nationals.

However investigations are ongoing to confirm who took part in the attack that claimed 67 lives.

Kenyans debate: Time to get troops out of Somalia?


Kenyan mourners attend a prayer service held for Mbugua Mwangi, President Uhuru Kenyatta's nephew, and his fiancee, Rosemary Wahito, at St. Andrews Church in Nairobi on September 26.

By Faith Karimi, CNN

Nairobi, Kenya (CNN) -- Twenty men are engaged in fiery debate on a sidewalk near Nairobi's Westgate mall, where terrorists stormed the shopping center and killed at least 67 people.

A man at the center gestures emphatically as some listen and nod. Others shake their heads.

Here and at coffee shops and barbershops and social spots the debate is much the same: Should Kenya withdraw its troops from Somalia after terrorists stormed the mall?

The terrorists who attacked the mall on Saturday claimed to be members of Somalia-based Al-Shabaab and barked out their resentment of Kenyan troops in their country.

"They said, 'We are the Al-Shabaab, we are here to kill you for killing our women in Somalia,'" said Jane Kamau, who hid in a box when attackers opened fire at the mall.


Kenya entered a high-stakes gamble two years ago when it sent troops to neighboring Somalia to flush out the Islamist militants it accused of kidnapping and killing foreigners in the coastal area.

The abductions affected Kenya's once-bustling tourism industry, a major hit to the nation's revenue.

Al-Shabaab vowed to attack Kenya until it withdrew its troops. Since then, grenades have landed at bus stops, churches, mosques and bars, killing dozens. Militants have regularly taken to social media to brag about their attacks and to threaten more.

'We need to protect our borders'

John Mutua, part of the sidewalk debate, said keeping troops in Somalia is not the best option.

"We need to get them out," said the 34-year-old businessman. "They'll keep killing us, and we'll continue killing them --- it will never end. We should all stop fighting, start afresh."
Next to him, bank teller John Kamau, 28, shakes his head vehemently.

"That's nonsense, it's not that easy," he said. "We're already in too deep. We will be considered cowards if we get out. They (Al-Shabaab) started it by killing and kidnapping people in our own land."

Mutua waves him off. He tries to draw in a Kenyan soldier standing guard near the cordoned-off area near the mall.

"Do you guys like being in Somalia?" Mutua asks.

The soldier glares at him and turns the other way, clutching a long rifle.


At a barber and hair-stylist shop about 20 miles from the mall, a similar debate is under way.

Jane Njeri sits under a buzzing hair dryer. She pops her head out long enough to give her two cents, before tucking her head back.

"The reason the troops invaded is because our borders were porous to begin with," she said. "We need to fix our security. We need to protect our borders. Those troops fighting in Somalia, we need to bring them home to help with those efforts. If we fix our security, we don't have to fear terrorists."


Philex Ambani, 23, said sending the troops there was not a good idea to begin with. But they should stay, he said.

"If they want our soldiers to get out, they need to stop killing us," he said. "It's that simple. It wasn't worth it to go there over a bunch of tourists, but we are already there. We can't give up now. "

The Westgate mall standoff ended Tuesday, according to government officials. It was the worst terror attack in the nation since al Qaeda blew up the U.S. Embassy in 1998, leaving more than 200 dead.

Kenya's president steadfast

Kenya is East Africa's biggest economy and a crucial trade route into the rest of the continent. It is also a major U.S. ally in the war against Islamist militants in the region.
It provides an important buffer of stability in a region that includes the fledgling Somali government and the politically tense Sudans.

Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta has ruled out the withdrawal of the military, which is now part of the African Union forces battling the militants in Somalia.

"We went as a nation to Somalia to fight the war against terror unleashed on Kenyan people, Somali people and people around the world,"

Kenyatta said this week. "This is not a Kenyan war, this is an international war."

READ: Was 'White Widow' involved in attack?
Godwin Murunga, deputy director of the African Leadership Centre in Nairobi, said the threat facing Kenya is complex and withdrawal from Somalia is not advisable.

But revamped security in the nation, he said, will go a long way.

"Kenya needs to bring its citizens together to recognize security threats, to mobilize them into a common security consciousness and surveillance system that they trust and have confidence in," Murunga wrote in an opinion piece for CNN.

'Don't ask me about Shabaab'

Having seen what happened to many of the victims of the mall massacre, Agnes Mumbua said she will do whatever she can to help protect herself.

A Catholic, she plans to learn how Muslims pray and the names of major Islamic figures.

Survivors of the mall massacre have said attackers asked victims whether they were Muslims. Those who failed to answer questions about Islam were killed, they said.

"If learning the Quran will help save me, I will do what it takes," she said. "It seems the Kenya government is not leaving Somalia soon, so I might as well protect myself."

Government officials have said the terror attack killed 62 people and five of the suspected 15 terrorists. At least 61 people remain missing, the Kenyan Red Cross has said.

Back on the sidewalk near Westgate, insurance agent Frederick Omolo shakes his head when asked his opinion about Al-Shabaab.

"Don't ask me about Shabaab. I don't want to hear that word in my life, ever," he said.
He's listening to the debate on the militant group, a brown envelope in his hand. In it are life insurance documents for his friend John, whom he was going to meet at a coffee house at the mall.

He was in the parking lot on his way to drop them off for John to sign when he heard gunshots and took off, clutching the envelope.
His friend never left the mall. No one has seen him since.

"On second thought," Omolo said, "let's improve our security big time, post armed cops in major public venues, do a sweep of areas suspected of harboring terrorists, then keep our troops in Somalia to do the job."

Omolo passed by the mall every day during the hostage crisis and sat on a sidewalk behind the police barricade, holding the insurance papers.

They are still in the brown envelope. 

Kenyan mall massacre 'hatched in Somalia, executed by English-speaking foreign fighters'

"A day or two before the attack, powerful belt-fed machine guns were secretly stashed in a shop in the mall with the help of a colluding employee."


Kenyan security forces begin the task of clearing and securing the Westgate shopping mall following a four-day siege by Al-Shabab militants.

Nairobi, Kenya: The Kenyan shopping mall massacre plot was hatched weeks or months ago on Somali soil, by an "external operations arm" of al-Shabab, a militant Islamist group based there, according to US security officials. A team of English-speaking foreign fighters was carefully selected, along with the target: Westgate, a gleaming upscale mall popular with expatriates and Nairobi's rising middle class.

The picture that is emerging from the US officials suggests careful planning: The building's blueprints were studied, down to the ventilation ducts. The attack was rehearsed and the team dispatched, slipping undetected through Kenya's porous borders, often patrolled by underpaid - and deeply corrupt - border guards.
"A day or two before the attack, powerful belt-fed machine guns were secretly stashed in a shop in the mall with the help of a colluding employee."
A day or two before the attack, powerful belt-fed machine guns were secretly stashed in a shop in the mall with the help of a colluding employee, officials say. At least one militant had even packed a change of clothes so he could slip out with fleeing civilians after the killings.

Civilians leave the mall on Saturday ... there is concern some militants may have escaped this way. Photo: AP
"They had people in there, they had stuff inside there," said a US security official who asked not to be identified because he was not authorised to speak publicly. "This was all ready to go when the shooters walked in."

President Uhuru Kenyatta said that intelligence reports had suggested that a British woman and two or three US citizens were involved, but that he could not confirm those reports. US officials said they had not determined the identities of the attackers and were awaiting DNA tests and footage from the mall's security cameras. But they said the massacre had been meticulously planned to draw maximum exposure.

Kenyan and US investigators have begun a sweeping inquiry into the massacre that killed scores of people, sifting through rubble, studying closed-circuit television footage and bringing in more resources to identify the attackers.
Days of mourning ... Agnes Mutua, who identified her nephew Christopher Kennedy Chewa's body, mourns after being informed that the mortuary refuses to release his body. Photo: Getty Images
"The next phase really is making sure we know what's under the rubble," said a government spokesman, Manoah Esipisu. "Forensic people need to be able to clear that rubble and examine the evidence beneath it."

The investigative work began a day after Kenyatta declared the four-day siege of the Westgate mall had ended, saying that the government had finally "ashamed and defeated our attackers" and that the last militants still holed up inside had been killed.

Joseph Ole Lenku, the Kenyan interior secretary, said at a news briefing on Wednesday that the death toll, now at 72, was not expected to rise significantly, Reuters reported, although the Kenyan Red Cross has said scores of people are still missing in the debris.

On Wednesday, Kenya began an official three-day period of mourning to mark one of the most unsettling episodes in its recent history.

The authorities in Kenya, widely perceived as an oasis of peace and prosperity in a troubled region, are struggling to answer how 10-15 Islamist extremists could lay siege to a shopping mall, then hold off security forces for days.

On multiple occasions, the Kenyan government said the mall was under its control, only to have fighting burst out again. Earlier on Tuesday, al-Shabab, which has taken responsibility for the attack, bragged in a Twitter message that its fighters were "still holding their ground."

Western security officials fear that several fighters slipped out of the mall during the mayhem of the attack, dropping their guns and disguising themselves as civilians, an account echoed by some witnesses.

Rift in al-Shabab

The way the attack was carried out may be related to a rift between Omar Hammami, an al-Shabab fighter who grew up in Alabama and became a phantomlike figure across the Somali deserts, and the group's emir, Ahmed Abdi Godane. Hammami - known by his nom de guerre, Abu Mansoor al-Amriki, "the American" - was reportedly fatally shot by another wing of al-Shabab less than two weeks ago, although he has been reported dead before only to resurface alive.

One reason for the rift was Hammami's complaints that al-Shabab had become too brutal toward fellow Muslims under Godane's leadership. That brutality, Hammami said, was the reason al-Shabab had become so unpopular in Somalia and had lost so much territory recently.

Witnesses to the siege in the mall have said the militants urged Muslims to get out before the shooting started, and Stig Jarle Hansen, a Norwegian researcher who has published a book on al-Shabab, said the rift might explain why the militants decided to spare Muslims. In the past, al-Shabab have killed countless Muslims in Somalia with suicide bombs and buried Muslim girls up to their necks in sand and stoned them.

"Even Osama bin Laden criticised Godane for being too harsh," Hansen said. "This attack might have been Godane's way of saying, 'See, I'm not so harsh - to Muslims.'?"

Much speculation has swirled around the question of whether any of the heavily armed militants were women.

Kenyan officials initially asserted that there had been no women among the attackers, but on Tuesday Kenyatta seemed to revive the possibility that one was a British woman.

Several intelligence analysts in Nairobi speculated that she was Samantha Lewthwaite, a Muslim convert who had been married to one of the four suicide bombers who struck the London transit system on July 7, 2005, killing 52 people and themselves.

Kenyan authorities suspect that Lewthwaite had risen up through the ranks of extremist groups and was leading a terrorism cell on the Kenyan coast; though they almost swooped in on her in 2011, she escaped. In Kenya and in Britain, she is now known as "the white widow."

British authorities confirmed on Wednesday that a British citizen had been detained in Nairobi. The Daily Mail newspaper said the 35-year-old man, believed to be of Somali origin, was arrested on Monday trying to board a Turkish Airlines flight to Turkey. His face was bruised, he was wearing dark glasses and he acted suspiciously, the newspaper said.

Asked to comment on the report, a Foreign Office spokeswoman, speaking in return for anonymity under departmental rules, confirmed the arrest and said the British authorities were offering "standard" consular assistance.

The New York Times

Somalia: Analysts Doubt Al-Shabab Chemical Arms Capability



Nairobi — In August 2012, African authorities arrested Mahdi Hashi, Ali Yassin Ahmed and Mohamed Yusuf, all in their twenties, as they were on their way to Yemen.

Months later the three defendants were presented to a U.S. district court in Brooklyn, New York, to answer charges that they joined and trained with Somalia-based al-Shabab militants.

The U.S. media outlet CBS News reports a court document related to the case indicates the men have substantial knowledge about al-Shabab plans to develop a chemical weapon for attacks western interests in the region against.

While recent four-day assault on Nairobi's Westgate mall shows the organization can commit major acts of terrorism across international borders, whether it is capable of handling chemical weapons technology is another question.

After steadily losing ground in Somalia, weakened by a concerted military effort by a multinational African Union force and Somali government troops, al-Shabab once controlled large portions of the country. More recently they have only been able to carry out hit-and-run attacks.

According to Abdullahi Halakhe, a Horn of Africa researcher who formerly worked for the International Crisis Group, the group's losses make it difficult for them to obtain and use chemical weapons.

"There are so many chemical engineers in the organization, but some of them have been killed," he said. "[A] high level of [personnel] and resources have been tracked down and killed, so it will be very hard."

Although migration of foreign terrorists into Somalia could alleviate that problem, Halakhe says, the rebel group would still face the challenge of storing and handling the chemicals.

"The possibility is very much there, because the movements of people - ex-Soviet [fighters or Jihadists], and the Afghanistan and Pakistan movement is there [in Africa], and Somalia was their target in the Horn," he said. "The capacity could be there but the facilities would be really a big struggle for them to pull it off."

Despite the odds, however, Halakhe says one cannot dismiss the possibility that al-Shabab could one day possess a chemical weapon.

And even without chemical arms, says Anneli Botha, senior terrorism researcher with the Institute for Security Studies, nothing can stop any terror group from trying to get chemical weapons, and that al-Shabab, in the meantime, will use any material at their disposal.

"If they want, they will try to find a way," she said. "But by the same token, with what they have - AK-47s, hand grenades, and they also know how to build IED's - they tend to go to their roots in some of this cases."

The Kenyan government has said the Nairobi mall attack was carried out by a group of multinational attackers with surprising sophistication.

Halakhe said if the allegations about al-Shabab seeking chemical weapons are confirmed, it suggests east Africa is facing a new type of danger from terrorism.

Somalia: Top Priority for FBI in Minnesota - Somali Extremists By Brian Padden,


Minnesota — U.S. law enforcement officials say preventing Somali Americans from aiding the terrorist organization al-Shabab continues to be its top priority in Minnesota, where the largest Somali community in the United States resides.

The FBI said it will not comment at this time on its active investigation into the al-Shabab terrorist group's attack on Nairobi's Westgate Mall and whether any Somali Americans were involved.

But for FBI agents in Minneapolis, combating al-Shabab's efforts to radicalize Somali Americans has been the top priority for years. Kyle Loven is the chief division counsel for the region. "We have individuals who have purportedly [been] going over to fight on behalf of a foreign terrorist organization which has been so designated by the state department," he noted. "So that is a violation of federal law and we've had some convictions here in the last couple of years."

More than 20 young Somali Americans have travelled to Somalia to fight for the terrorist group. Some were killed overseas. Some returned and were convicted of aiding a terrorist organization and sentenced to between 3 and 20 years. Loven said the FBI is intent on ending the terrorist ties between Somalia and Minnesota.

"We want to discover who is radicalizing these young men, facilitators, where the money is coming from, and try to disrupt this pipeline of young Somali men. That is the aim of this investigation," Loven said.

Anders Folk, former assistant U.S. attorney for Minnesota said counter-terrorism is also a main focus. "In terms of the number of cases prosecuted and in terms of the number of defendants convicted, it is the most extensive counter terrorism investigation that Minneapolis has seen," he said.

He said the Islamic militant organization indoctrinates disaffected Muslim youths in the twin cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul to recruit friends to wage jihad against enemies of Islam.

"Al-Shabab used peer to peer recruiting in the twin cities, that it used individuals who once they left Minnesota and joined the organization in Somalia, those individuals reached back to their friends and family in the twin cities," Folk explained.

Folk said law enforcement and moderate Somalis have reduced the influence of al-Shabab, but the group is still trying to reach out to at-risk Somali men in Minnesota.

How an accountant with a fondness for poetry became head of Al-Shabab, one of world’s most-wanted terrorists


Al-Shabab leader Ahmed Abdi Godane is rarely seen in public and communicates mostly through audio-recorded messages.
by Maria Assaf 

After assassinating several rivals in Al-Shabab this year, Ahmed Abdi Godane has emerged as undisputed leader of an organization that had lost support, funds and the little legitimacy it had enjoyed among clans in Somalia.
Now, with the Nairobi mall massacre, he is sending the world and his supporters a message: This is what my leadership will look like.

“Godane is completely uncompromising,” said Matt Bryden, director of Sahan Research, a group of Somali intellectuals based in Nairobi.

“He is not a pragmatist. He is not interested in negotiating. It is not even clear that Al-Shabab has a vision of national leadership, or that they aspire to become leaders.”

Rather, Mr. Godane’s agenda is “a very vague sort of nebulous commitment” to jihad and the caliphate, a global Islamic state.

“The expression of that agenda is nihilistic violence,” Mr. Bryden added.

The 36-year-old jihadi belongs to the Isaaq tribe from the northern region of Somaliland where he was born.

He reportedly sold charcoal in his home city of Hargiesa before winning a scholarship from a Saudi Arabian religious foundation to study economics in Pakistan. He is also believed to have managed a supermarket with long-time friend Ibrahim Afghani, who he would later have killed.

The slightly built extremist, who is said to have a fondness for poetry, worked as an accountant for a while for a firm that specialized in overseas remittances, a key part of terror-funding. He also received some military training in Afghanistan.

We will fight and the wars will not end until Islamic sharia is implemented in all continents in the world

According to unconfirmed reports from Somali media, Mr. Godane, who also goes by the name Mukhtar Abu Zubair, has a home in Sharjah, United Arab Emirates, where his wife and children have lived since 2008. That same year he became Al-Shabab leader.

He is rarely seen in public and communicates mostly through audio-recorded messages. In one message — responding to a U.S. missile attack that killed fellow jihadist Adan Hashi Ayro — he vowed, “We will fight and the wars will not end until Islamic sharia is implemented in all continents in the world.”

Under his leadership, Al-Shabab has specialized in suicide bombings and large-scale terrorist attacks. These tactics earned him a rebuke from al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, who rejected Mr. Godane’s proposal to unite their organizations.

The expression of that agenda is nihilistic violence

Al-Shabab leader Ahmed Abdi Godane
AFP/Getty Images
He also warned Mr. Godane against forcing sharia law on Somalis before they were ready, writing he should,”remain devout, patient and persistent in upholding high moral values … towards the community.”

The letter was dated Aug. 7, 2010, a month after Al-Shabab suicide bombers killed 74 people watching the soccer World Cup final in the Ugandan capital Kampala. After the attack, Washington placed a US$7-million bounty on Mr. Godane, making him one of the world’s most-wanted terrorists.

“[He is] from the extreme fringe of Al-Shabab,” said Mr. Bryden.

But after bin Laden’s death, his successor, Ayman al-Zawahiri, accepted Al-Shabab as part of the organization.

Mr. Godane is a takfiri, someone who believes apostates from Islam and even Muslims who do not share the same jihadist vision must die. Al-Shabab’s ideological principle, as a faction of al-Qaeda, is to turn Somalia into an Islamic state.

AP Photo/File
This April 1998 file photo shows then-exiled Saudi dissident Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan.
“And then possibly go beyond to merge with other jihadi groups in a global jihadi caliphate,” said Mr. Bryden.

Not all senior commanders have agreed.

“Within Al-Shabab’s upper echelon, there have been long-standing disputes and conflicts regarding goals, strategies, and tactics,” said a report this year from the Homeland Security Policy Institute at George Washington University.

“Many of these appear to be moulded around the discourse concerning globalist versus nationalist agendas.”

Islamist fighters loyal to Somalia's Al-Qaeda inspired Al-Shebab group perform drills near Mogadishu in February 2011.Abdurashid Abdulle/AFP/Getty Images/Files
In June, Mr. Godane engineered the killings of his former friend, Ibrahim Afghani, former top commander Sheik Maalim Burhan and an American rival, Omar Hammami.

They had accused him of becoming tyrannical, neglecting the teachings of Islam and mistreating foreign fighters.

With his rivals out of the way, Mr. Godane was undisputed leader of Al-Shabab, an organization that once promised stability in Somalia, where failed governments have been the norm for the past 20 years.
But the group began losing support when it drove out foreign food aid agencies during the 2010-12 famine that killed almost 260,000 people, according the United Nations.
Al-Shabab also lost its stronghold in Mogadishu in 2011, when it was driven out by Kenyan troops. The following year, it was forced to leave the port of Kismayo, which used to provide welcome revenue from shipping levies and duties.
This month, about 160 of Somalia’s most distinguished religious scholars denounced Al-Shabab, declaring it was “a religious duty” to turn members over to the authorities.
A sort of meaner, leaner Al-Shabab
“This is unprecedented in Somalia’s history that a group of well-respected and internationally based and local scholars came together and declared a fatwa and denounced the organization, and said they were not speaking in the name of Islam,” said Yusuf Hassan Abdi, a member of Kenya’s parliament.
Cedric Barnes, regional director at the International Crisis Group, a think-tank devoted to preventing conflicts worldwide, said while Mr. Godane was not necessarily popular in Somalia, “he is popular amongst a certain group of people who believe in his values and the value that Al-Shabab is holding.”
And that could make Al-Shabab more dangerous.
“What he’s got left is a sort of meaner, leaner Al-Shabab,” said Mr. Bryden.
AP Photo/Khalil Senosi, File
A security guard, left, helps
a woman outside the Westgate Mall
in Nairobi, Kenya Saturday,
Sept. 21, 2013 following an
attack by armed Islamic extremist
group al-Shabab.
“He has consolidated a much-diminished Al-Shabab. So on the one hand it is a weaker Al-Shabab, but on the other, it is more cohesive, tightly knit, more secretive and more violent.”
“Everybody is very much loyal to him,” said Mr. Barnes. “He has set up an organization that is highly disciplined and well organized.”
Experts believe Al-Shabab carried out the Nairobi attack to show its closeness to al-Qaeda, to emphasize Mr. Godane’s leadership and revenge itself on the Kenyan government for invading Somalia.
“Godane and his group clearly like to see themselves as part of the al-Qaeda network. In reality, the ties are not very strong, structurally and organizationally. But ideologically they seem to be closer than they’ve been in the past,” said Mr. Bryden.
Arne Kislenko, adjunct professor of national security and terrorism at the University of Toronto, expects there will be more violence.
Low-cost attacks like the one on the Nairobi mall are “not terribly difficult to pull of and … have the tangible effect of causing people a great deal of anxiety and shutting folks out of their lives,” he said.
“You can bet that pretty quickly they are going to show that they can do something else. These are hard-core men.”
National Post, with files from news services

In-Depth Anlysis in African Context: Putting the Westgate siege in context (Soomaaliya Waxay Dhibane u Tahay Gumaysiga Cusub ee Reer Galbeedka)

The Somali militant group Al Shabaab has claimed responsibility for the September 21 attack at an upmarket shopping mall in Nairobi in which dozens of people were killed. Progressives must intensify their opposition to extremists who manipulate Islam, but also reject the imperial forces inside Africa and their allies

by Horace G Campbell

INTRODUCTION

Westgate Mall

As peace loving beings in all parts of the world absorb the enormity of the extremists attack on innocent civilians in Kenya leading to the deaths of over 70 persons, it is important to start out by condemning in no uncertain terms the cowardly nature of this attack by the fanatics who claimed responsibility in the name of Al Shabaab. This attack on innocent civilians at the Westgate Mall in Nairobi had nothing to do with Islam and everything to do with the debasement of human beings in Africa and the need for a clear political project to expose and isolate the extremists.

One of the many realities of this form of violence and low intensity warfare is the ways in which global competition for African resources have served to manipulate gullible elements within and outside of Africa. While the media has sensationalized this attack, it is worth reflecting on some of the underlying contradictions inside the region of Eastern Africa and how these contradictions are being played out inside of Kenya and the region. For many entrepreneurs in the strategic industries that profit from militarism, the event in Nairobi is a godsend in so far as it vindicates the argument that Africa is a hotbed of terrorism and it is not possible to wind down the war on terror. For the planners who are strategizing for the rich oil and gas resources of the East African coast, this episode provides another opportunity to deepen the divisions within Eastern Africa and pump out more stories and images of ‘failed states.’ For the discredited leaders of Kenya, Rwanda and Uganda, this episode provides an opportunity to grandstand in support of the Kenyan political leadership against the International Criminal Court (ICC). In a speech before the General Assembly of the United Nations on Tuesday September 24, Museveni said, “The ICC, in a shallow, biased way, has continued to mishandle complex African issues. This is not acceptable. The ICC should stop."

That Yoweri Museveni, the President of Uganda serving for 27 years, has now stood before the 68th session of General Assembly of the United Nations as a champion of Pan Africanism and African independence is most ironic in so far as the army of Museveni has been the most servile in the interests of US forces in Eastern Africa. These distortions call for clarity in the ranks of the peace and justice forces internationally and for sharper analysis and actions within the global Pan African Movement.

Kenya is an important base for the consolidation of the unification of the peoples of Africa and the recent experiences of warfare, famine, alienation and militarism point to the urgency for coordination for peace from the peoples of Africa. The massive discovery of oil and natural gas off the East African Coast from Djibouti down to Mozambique has the possibility of changing the geo-political map of the world as all and sundry now see the future of the world economy as centered in the Indian Ocean as opposed to the Atlantic Ocean. The genius and creativity of the youths of Eastern Africa can be mobilized by the progressive Pan African forces if there is slow and careful planning for the Pan African project of removing the artificial boundaries that were established at the Conference of Berlin in 1884.

In our contribution this week we assert our opposition to the extremists who are manipulating Islam in the name of violence. At the same time we are opposing the imperial forces in Africa and their allies in the Gulf who are opposed to the dignity and peaceful existence of African peoples. The veteran Pan African writer Prof Awoonor, 78, was a one of those who lost their earthly lives in this senseless attack by individuals who are as anti-African as they are anti-human. Awoonor had served in the literary ranks of the Pan African movement with distinction in areas of importance for the Global Pan African family, Brazil, USA, UK and Africa. He had been in Nairobi to commune with other literary Pan Africanists in the Storymoja Hay Festival.

Kenya is the base of a vibrant populace whose creativity in literature has produced some of the leading Pan African writers and activists such as Micere Githae Mugo and Ngugi Wa Thiongo. It is from the same Kenya where we are in the midst of new platforms for finance and technology that have democratized banking and changed the political economy of Kenya and East Africa. The challenge for the progressive wing of the global Pan African movement is to mobilize energies in the midst of this tragedy to speed the processes of political transformation and unification in Africa.

WHO CONTROLS THE NARRATIVE ON KENYA AND SOMALIA?

When tragedies such as the killings and hostage taking in the Westgate Mall occur, there are immediate calls from within the movement for the right kind of literature and analysis that can make sense of the nonsense that comes from the western media. As the images were being played out in the media in print and television, I remembered the many meetings that were held by Fahamu staff and this writer at that mall. The office of Fahamu (parent organization for Pambazuka News) is just next door to this mall. This is just one of the messages that I received from comrades in Kenya,

“Hi Prof,

Many days? 'Ope you've been keeping' well. Trust me, I'm safe and sound. Do you remember the last time I was with you, we sat at Art Cafe at Westgate? Just thought of all the times I've been at the shopping mall and I recalled meeting you there, last year.”

This was a journalist from a prominent daily in Nairobi who has kept in touch over the past six years. One of our students from our Pan African Master’s Program in Syracuse wrote to ask, 'What should I be reading?' I referred him to the writings of Abdi Samatar and alerted him to the fact that I had been in the middle of reading the book by James Fergusson, The World's Most Dangerous Place: Inside the Outlaw State of Somalia. This book written by an English journalist is presented in the mode of psychological warfare from the British point of view. It represents the disinformation from the British journalistic world to reinforce the arguments about failed sates in Africa. From the contents of the book, especially the sections n Al Shabaab, one can see that the writer had access to British intelligence sources on the different factions in the differing regions of Somalia, Somaliland, Puntland and the areas of central Somalia around Mogadishu.

The other noteworthy book to have come out recently by a British writer is that by Mary Harper, Getting Somalia Wrong.: Faith and War in a Shattered State. Although less strident in its vilification of Africans and praise for western humanitarianism, this book again carries the underlying analysis of Somalia as a ‘failed state.’ These writers are part of the network of experts and journalists who are then fed into the networks for consultancy and news that forms the background for the reports to the Security Council of the United Nations. What was significant about the book by Mary Harper was that in its discussion of the numerous resources in Somalia: livestock, cattle, camels, charcoal, qat, etc, there is no mention of the massive oil resources that lie off the coast of Somalia and East Africa. Instead the topics of piracy and terrorism grace the pages without clarity on the interconnections between the so-called pirates and the international insurance companies. In an effort to control the narrative on Somalia and Africa we are bombarded with details of the ‘tribal’ and clan factions in Somalia.

African anthropologists and social scientists who have written extensively on the politicization and militarization of the clan structures in Somalia are not usually cited in the reviews and commentaries about the rise of violent extremism in Somalia. There are a few Kenyan researchers who have been writing and commenting on the conflagration but their output has come in the form of consultancy report. One of the better studies from the pan African point of view was that by Afyare Abdi Elmi, Understanding the Somalia Conflagration: Identity, Political Islam and Peace-building on the decomposition of the Somalia state and the responsibility of progressive Somalis and Africans to rise above political Islam.

Abdi Samatar has been consistently working and writing to articulate a Pan African analysis of the conflagration in Somalia and from time to time the public broadcasting stations in North America call on him for commentaries but the resources for labeling Somalia as a hotbed of terror ensure that progressives in the Pan African intellectual circuits do not have access to the big research budgets. I remember vividly the differences between Professor Abdi Samatar and Jendayi Frazier (then Assistant Secretary of State for Africa) over how the world should view the response of the peoples of East Africa to the Ethiopian invasion and incursions into Somalia. Somalia’s Islamic Courts Union, a coalition of a dozen groups, had created the basis for a peaceful life and had isolated the military entrepreneurs who the West called warlords. We now know that the violence and destruction of the past seven years could have been avoided if the arguments of Samatar and other peace activists in and outside Somalia had been heeded. The Ethiopians and the Bush Administration could not tolerate peace breaking out in Somalia because instability in Somalia and Eastern Africa served the geo-strategic interests of war planners in Washington. Along with its allies in Saudi Arabia, the Gulf and Yemen the networks for violent extremism were tolerated while the United States rolled out the Africa Command to fight terrorism in Africa. That fight against terror has now been complicated by the intense competition between the differing states of Europe over the future oil and gas mining in Somalia.

THE FUTURE OIL BONANZA IN SOMALIA


In the past two years the news from Somalia has been dominated by the information that there could be as much as 110 billion barrels of oil and gas off the shores of Somalia. There is also likely to be vast natural gas reserves in Somali waters in the Indian Ocean. Fields containing an estimated 100 trillion cubic feet of gas have been found off Mozambique and Tanzania. British politicians and British oil companies have been the most active in seeking to corner the future exploration of this oil and it is not by accident that the most recent conferences on the future of Somalia has been held in London and hosted by David Cameron, the Prime Minister and head of the Conservative Party of Britain. One of the first companies to have signed a contract with the Government of Somalia is the front for British petroleum interests that is now registered as Soma Oil & Gas Exploration Ltd. This company was recently founded in the United Kingdom and its chairman is Michael Howard, a former leader of the Conservative Party. We are also informed that CEO Robert Sheppard has experience as an adviser for the U.K. oil company BP PLC (LON: BP) in Russia.

Very soon after the long transition and the more than fifteen meetings to organize a sensible form of governance in Somalia, the British moved in to muscle out an African as the Special Representative of the Secretary General (SRSG) for Somalia. Nicholas Kay has emerged as the SRSG for Somalia at a moment when Britain is seeking to dominate the institutions and organizations that will have control over the decision making processes for the oil and gas exploration in Somalia. From the moment of the decomposition of the Somalia government and the manipulation of the military entrepreneurs by western forces, Britain had been cooling its heels working with the political elements in that section of Somalia that had been colonized by Britain after the Berlin Conference. During the colonial era Britain had used this region to provide meat for its troops in the Gulf and British Somaliland was governed from India.

British oil companies for decades had knowledge of the massive oil reserves off the coast of Somalia and the British teased the ‘leaders’ of Somaliland with the gesture that they would recognize this secessionist region as a breakaway state. Pan Africanists will remember that at the Berlin Conference in 1885 the peoples of Somalia were divided in to five areas (French Somaliland, -now called Djibouti, British Somaliland, Italian Somaliland, the Ethiopian areas of Somalia –in the Ogaden and the Somalia peoples who were located in what came to be known as Kenya), There are up to 300,000 citizens of Somali extraction in Europe and while the racism of Britain alienates the more than 100,000 Somali youth, Britain is opportunist and when Mo Farah won the gold medal for the 10,000m at the London 2012 Olympics, the British press forgot the jingoism that alienated and confused many youth of Somali extraction who yearned for some purpose in their lives.

British newspapers and politicians had showered praises on the breakaway region telling them that this was a region of peace in a haven of violent Somalia. However, the British always had their eyes on the massive oil resources. Some foreign companies signed deals with the breakaway governments of Puntland and Somaliland but these entities were never recognized by the African Union.

For about ten years the British were waiting in Somaliland until they knew that Ugandans had cleaned up the situation and many Africans died. They were quite willing for Africans (Ugandans and Burundians) to die in the AMISOM operation while the western P3 members of the Security Council quibbled over how much money the UN should spend on the peacekeeping force in Somalia. Nicholas Kay, the new SSRG, has traveled to the General Assembly this week to lobby for more resources for AMISOM, presumably because it will be important to guard the British nationals who will be flocking to Mogadishu. Kay is by no means a small player in the British political establishment. Before he was deployed to Mogadishu as the SSRG he had been the Africa Director at the United Kingdom Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Prior to this position at the FCO, he served as Ambassador to the Republic of the Democratic of the Congo and the Sudan from 2007 to 2010 and 2010 to 2012, respectively. He was also the United Kingdom’s Regional Coordinator for Southern Afghanistan and Head of the Provincial Reconstruction Team for Helmand Province from 2006 to 2007. In short, he has the experience of serving British interests in war zones. There are numerous other British elements in the interstices of the United Nations system working to ensure the ascendancy of British interests.

MOVING AGAINST AFRICANS AND MANIPULATING AFRICANS


The US form of warfare in Somalia had followed the new template of drones, local militia forces, private military contractors and third party countries. In the war in Libya, this form of warfare had been used with the army of Qatar acting as the third party country. In Somalia; Uganda had been the country most willing to serve imperial interests after the Ethiopians had invaded to oust the Union of Islamic Courts. The historic differences between Somalia and Ethiopia ensured that Ethiopia could not be a real force for peace, especially in the very undemocratic and repressive conditions inside Ethiopia. Ugandans deployed more than 6000 fighters to Mogadishu and hundreds lost their lives. The Ugandans and Burundians formed the bulk of the African Union Peace Keeping forces (AMISOM) that drove Al Shabaab out of Mogadishu

The reports from the families in Uganda were that hundreds, if not thousands of Ugandans lost their lives in the forms of battle that raged from street to street and alley to alley in Somalia. Reports of the fighting were that it was similar to the kind of warfare of 1914-1918. While this fighting was going on, the western countries were opposed to financing the AMISOM mission and were quite willing and ready to have Africans die in the streets of Mogadishu as it turns out now to serve the interests of western oil companies.

If Museveni was a front for the US military in Somalia, by the time the body bags were being flown back to Kampala, Museveni had his own interest in ensuring that the violent extremists in Somalia were decapitated. Museveni worked closely with Augustine Mahiga who had moved from the safety of Nairobi when he took up the position of SRSG in 2010. Both Mahiga and Museveni had worked closely with Nyerere and both had been on the periphery of the Dar es Salaam school in the era of Walter Rodney, Issa Shivji and the period when all operatives in Tanzania identified with the African liberation project. When Britain wanted to get the position of SRSG, the campaign of disinformation intensified about the diplomatic and military capabilities of their African allies such as Mahiga and Museveni.

After the Ugandans died in the hundreds, the Western military lobby moved against Augustine Mahiga the Special Representative of the Secretary General. Mahiga is a Tanzanian and he worked hard from Mogadishu while the European members of the UN team spend their time in Nairobi. There had been a struggle between Germany, Norway, Britain and South Africa to get this SRSG post that can be like the neo-colonial governor in Mogadishu. Kay won out using the British special relationship with the USA to succeed.

The Norwegians wanted the position of SRSG and promised $30 million in aid to the new Somalia government, but the British muscled out the Norwegians. The secessionist state of Somaliland had signed a production sharing agreement with DNO, a Norwegian oil and gas company, but British interests were working hard against Norway. Enter David Cameron who became the champion for the convening of conferences to reconstruct Somalia. This very same Cameron who had been attacking Somali nationals in Britain as the forces that ensured that multiculturalism does not work was the same who dispatched William Hague to Mogadishu in n 2012. The Prime Minister of Turkey, Edrogan had been the first leader of a foreign government to visit Mogadishu in 2011 and Britain wanted to be counted as a state that supported the people of Somalia. More recently in September 2013, there was the convening of a special EU New Deal for peace meeting in Brussels. The European Union pledged 650 million euros to help Somalia's peace and rebuilding process but after one read the fine print one could see that most of what was said amounted to pledges. The British Department for International Development (DFID) rolled out and published its own commitments made in the meeting but when the sums were added it did not come to the $30 that had been pledged by Norway and rejected by the Government of Somalia in favor of the British promises.

REGIONAL DIMESNIONS

The heavy fighting to remove Al Shabaab from Mogadishu had been undertaken by Ugandans and Burundians but in September/October 2011, the Kenya Defense Forces (KDF) invaded Somalia under the banner of Linda Nchi (Kiswahili for defend the nation). At the time of the Kenyan incursion in 2011, I had written in Pambazuka that the intended remilitarization of Africa will fail. I had written,

“The government of Kenya has declared that it will end its military campaign against Al-Shabaab in Somalia when it is satisfied it has stripped the group of its capacity to attack across the border. If one goes by the experience of the past 18 years, then this statement can be read that Kenya will be in for a long-term deployment to Somalia. The corollary to this is the reality that Kenya and its cities will be spaces of war, security clampdown and general destabilisation of the population. Since the Kenyan foray, there have been two grenade attacks at a bar and a bus terminal that killed one person and wounded more than 20 people in the Kenyan capital Nairobi. These attacks have already affected the tourism industry, one of the most important sources of revenue for the government of Kenya.”

From the books mentioned above we have read that the Kenyan incursion into Somalia had been planned long in advance by the KDF and that the Kenyans were looking for the most opportune time to justify the incursion into Somalia. The international media blitz about famine, refugees and Al Shabaab in 2011 provided the right background for the Kenyan people to support the KDF into Somalia. Kenyans had been lukewarm towards the military after the security forces had failed to protect innocent civilians after the violence of 2008.

 The political leaders of Kenya had been working with French companies to map out the future of the recovery of oil resources in Kenya on land and offshore. There had been disputes between Kenya and the Federal Transition Government of Somalia over the Exclusive Economic Zones of Kenya and Somalia. Both countries had produced competing maps to lay claim to the EEZ off the coast of Southern Somalia. The Kenyan forces had collaborated with a questionable military entrepreneur of the Ras Kamboni group and the Ugandans were not happy that Kenya had intervened in Somalia after hundreds of Ugandans had already lost their lives.

CONTRADICTIONS BETWEEN KENYA AND BRITAIN


There is now a major contradiction between Britain and Kenya over the future of Somalia. In the past one hundred years, Kenya had been the base for British imperial operations in East Africa. From Nairobi, British capitalism had sought to dominate the East African region and Britain had encouraged Kenyan capitalists to break up the East African community. British exploitation of the resources of Kenya was originally concentrated on agriculture with the production of tea, coffee, flowers and other products high on the list. In the era of energy, consumer products, telecommunications and security, British companies did profitable business in Kenya while the academic institutions of Britain and the USA churned out data on the tribal differences in Kenya.

After the contested elections in 2007, the Kenyan political leadership had gestured economically to China while firmly linked ideologically to western capitalism. Britain was most concerned about this gesture of the Kenyan leadership towards China crowned by the successful visit of Mwai Kibaki to China in 2010. Bilateral trade volume between Kenya and China has increased significantly in recent years, with China becoming Kenya's major trading partner. In 2012, imports from China were $1.92 billion, imports from the United States $776 million, and from the United Kingdom $575 million. When the Kenyans rolled out plans for the Lamu port and the corridor to link the coast to South Sudan and Ethiopia, western capitalist companies could not compete in the bidding and so Britain decided to switch and plan to control Somalia.

The impressive Lamu Port and South Sudan Ethiopia Transport (LAPSSET) Corridor project involves the development of a new transport corridor from the new port of Lamu through Garissa, Isiolo, Maralal, Lodwar and Lokichoggio to branch at Isiolo to Ethiopia and Southern Sudan. This will comprise of a new road network, a railway line, oil refinery at Lamu, oil pipeline, Isiolo and Lamu Airports and a free port at Lamu (Manda Bay) in addition to resort cities at the coast and in Isiolo. It will be the backbone for opening up Northern Kenya and integrating it into the national economy. Despite this impressive planning for LAPSSET, the shortsightedness of the Kenyans about the future Pan African Unification meant that the planning for this project fell under the banner of the dubious Kenya 2030 project.

Britain had been the number one trading partner of Kenya right up to 2008. France waited quietly and patiently while the relationship between Kenya and Britain deteriorated and the French oil company Total prepared itself to be the major partner of the Kenyan financial and real estate barons. France has methodically maneuvered to become a force in the English speaking enclaves of Eastern Africa.

US PRIVATE CONTRACTORS AND GULF CONSERVATIVES

For the preservation of the investment in militarism in Africa, Somalia had been the most important talking point for the strategic planners in Washington. With the awareness that the presence of US troops had fuelled a massive anti-imperialist consciousness inside Somalia, the US maintained a very low profile with in Somalia working with drone warfare and private contractors. In the book by James Fergusson on Somalia we have the most detailed information of Bancroft International as a CIA front in Mogadishu and Nairobi. Western intelligence agencies cannot deny knowledge of the various networks of violent extremists because it is from this very same network that the west is now recruiting Jihadists for its war in Syria.

From the Reports of the Secretary General of the United Nations to the Security Council we have the names of the ten or so prominent private contractors that are involved in the war against Africa in the differing parts of Somalia. According to the press, all of these private military contractors dream of being as successful as Bancroft International. According to the UN Report of June 2013, “In Kismaayo, the United States-based Atlantean Worldwide represented itself to the Monitoring Group as a “life support” company. Meanwhile, it is marketing its presence in Somalia to oil and gas companies with the image of a risk management company, as well as portraying itself to several Nairobi-based diplomats as the “Bancroft of Kismaayo”.

It is from Kismayo where Kenya is seeking to create a buffer state called Jubaland, dividing Somalia even further so that the Kenyan bourgeoisie can control the oil of the coast of Kismayo.

SALAFISTS AND WAHABISTS

We now know from the information provided by Edward Snowden that the National Security Agency of the USA has a massive information gathering apparatus all around the world. Hence, it would be incredible to believe that the US does not have the information about the foundations and organizations in the Gulf that finance the violent extremists that are labeled as Al Shabaab. The spoilers for the Kenyan bourgeoisie in their manipulation of the war on terror are the conservative fronts from the Gulf and Saudi Arabia. They finance the religious extremists in Somalia who have links to the militarists. These spoilers finance extremists all over East Africa. It is here important that these extremists act in the name of Islam but their activities have been most unislamic. As Samir Amin rightly observed, “The Islam proposed by political Islam in all its diverse organizations (‘extremist’ or even ‘terrorist’ and so-called ‘moderate’) is definitely an obscurantist Islam, unable to help understand the nature of contemporary world challenges. It is a version of Islam at the service of primitive and brutal forms of exploitation of the weak (‘the people’) by the ‘strong’ (the ruling cliques who exploit the return to religion). And these ‘strong’ are nothing but transmission belts for the country’s integration into the global system dominated by the monopolies of the Triad (USA, Europe, Japan). The Somalian ‘small market’ provides no means of resistance to this domination, and the leaders of Islamic movements may not even be aware of this.”

Somalia must be kept unstable in preparation for the coming war in the region. Africa must be destabilized so that imperialism and their allies can use African resources in the coming wars.

INTELLECTUAL AND IDEOLOGICAL WARFARE

The intellectual and ideological war over the future of Africa is now intense and it is important that Somalians at home and abroad along with their allies in the overseas Somali community as well as in the wider Pan African community to get more information on how this attack on the Mall fits into the overall imperial strategy. Whatever the outcome of this Mall event, it will be used to strengthen repression and to isolate progressive forces. Progressive forces internationally must intensify our opposition to religious extremism and at the same time expose how the Global War on Terror fuels actions such as the one that took place at the Mall.

Kenya is in a very difficult situation because the Kenyan leadership will want to gesture in an anti-imperialist direction over the international Criminal Court. They also want to be anti-imperialist so that the financial forces that control banking and telecommunications can branch out into the energy sector and control the oil in Somalia

PSEUDO ANTI-IMERIALISM AND THE AFRICAN UNION

Progressives in Africa cannot fall for the pseudo anti-imperialism of Uhuru Kenyatta that is now being voiced by Museveni. This anti-imperialism is so layered that it will require a high level of sophistication to grasp the subtexts of game playing that is going on with the Kenyan leadership. At the time of the 50th anniversary of the struggles for the unification of Africa the discussions were hijacked by Kenya who called for the African Union to boycott the ICC in solidarity with the leadership of Kenya. After the meeting in May, that same leadership went on a diplomatic offensive to call on African people to oppose the ICC. Yoweri Museveni was the front person for this task and his presentation before the General Assembly this week was part of the alliance between the Ugandan leadership and the Kenyan leadership. Museveni had been one of the first leaders in Africa to refer a case to the ICC when he cooperated with the ICC to issue an arrest warrant for Kony of the Lord’s Resistance Army to the ICC.

Kenya had mounted a diplomatic offensive using Museveni as a front calling on the African Union to hold a special summit on the question of the trial of the President of Kenya Uhuru Kenyatta and Vice President William Ruto before the ICC. The Kenyan information platforms had argued that, “the trial of Kenya’s top two executives will undermine their ability to govern the country; that a lot of work has already been done to resettle the people displaced by the post-election violence in 2008; that the trial will reopen old wounds; that Kenya has a new Constitution that can be used to create local courts to try the cases; and that the AU request to have the case moved to Kenya has been ignored by the ICC.”

From the East African newspaper of the region, one can see that there are many different levels to the manipulation. When William Ruto, the Vice President of Kenya was slated to travel to The Hague to stand trial, both Uganda and Rwanda asked President Uhuru Kenyatta to stop Ruto from flying to The Hague as his trial on charges of crimes against humanity kicked off.

According to the same newspaper, “the request was tabled when President Kenyatta met Uganda’s Foreign Affairs Minister Sam Kutesa and Rwanda’s Louise Mushikiwabo in Nairobi on September 8, two days before Mr Ruto flew out to the International Criminal Court. The EastAfrican has learnt that President Kenyatta insisted on his deputy attending court, arguing that failure to appear before the ICC could trigger a warrant of arrest and “the argument of whether they are innocent would be lost.”

Future revelations will inform the people of Kenya if this is another layer of the financial and political struggles inside Kenya where some sections may be willing to sacrifice Ruto.

There is genuine opposition within Africa to the selectivity of the ICC but the progressive forces within Africa may oppose the ICC but they cannot support the impunity that is embedded in the campaign of Yoweri Museveni. In the post-election violence of January 2008 there were over 1300 Kenyans who died violently and more than half a million have been displaced. Up to the present time of writing September 2013, five years after the carnage no one has been held accountable for the deaths of these Kenyans. Just as Uhuru Kenyatta has appeared on the world stage calling for the prosecution of those who carried out the Westgate Mall attack, it is necessary for Kenyans for find the right basis for holding accountable those who orchestrated the post-election violence.

PAN-AFRICANISTS MUST BE VIGILANT INTENSIFY POLITICAL WORK

Since 1992 Somalia has been destabilized by imperial forces. Imperialism has attempted to solve the political problems of Somalia by military means. This effort to militarize Somalia drew in the entire region as the militarization of ethnicity emboldened military entrepreneurs who understood the business of warfare. The peoples of Somalia are now spread over the length and breadth of Eastern and southern Africa. What affects Somalia will affect all of Africa. The political solution to the questions of destabilization cannot be resolved outside a process of demilitarization, reconstruction and unity. The new oil resources have provided the basis for a new round of militarism as the British have switched sides in East Africa. The siege of the Mall and the killing demand a higher level of understanding than to shout about terrorists. There must be a sober inquiry into the nature of the forces that carried out this terrible attack.

Kenyans and the peoples of East Africa have been suffering from economic terrorism for decades. It is in Kenya where there are some of the most sophisticated political forces. Imperial Britain, the USA understands this and since the period of the Land and Freedom Army has worked to divide the people of Kenya. Tribe was the preferred tool but in the era of extreme fundamentalism, religion is now the tool to divide and dominate. These extremists all thrive on the oppression of women.


The political leaders of Kenya and Uganda want to divert the reconstruction project of Africa by calling a special session to defend Uhuru Kenyatta. Progressive Pan Africanists cannot support this special session that is called and being masterminded by Yoweri Museveni. There must be special courts in Kenya and a Truth and Reconciliation Commission to heal the wounds of the political killings that took place in 2008.

Kenyan researchers and progressive intellectuals must go beyond the media to work against impunity. Somalia will have to be integrated into a people centered Eastern Africa. There is too much at stake.

The covert struggles between Britain and Kenya over oil have to be uncovered while progressives find a way to undercut the Museveni call for a special session of the African Union. Kofi Awonoor, Tajudeen Abdul Raheem and Philippe Wamba were outstanding Pan Africanists who departed this life in Kenya. They have joined the hundreds of thousands whose lives watered the seeds for freedom and unity. We cannot disappoint them. As Tajudeen would say, Don’t Mourn, Organize.

-----

* Horace Campbell is Professor of African American Studies and Political Science, Syracuse University. Campbell is also the Special Invited Professor of International Relations at Tsinghua University, Beijing. He is the author of Global NATO and the Catastrophic Failure in Libya: Lessons for Africa in the Forging of African Unity, Monthly Review Press, New York 2013