Algiers — Former Algerian Prime Minister Ali
Benflis expressed Sunday in Algiers his commitment to "support the
organization of a referendum of self-determination under the auspices of
the United Nations in Western Sahara".
During his announcement to run for presidential elections in April
2014, Mr. Benflis also affirmed that "Algeria thanks to its unique
geo-political, is invited to be a key player when it comes to the themes
of peace , security and cooperation in the Mediterranean", recalling in
this regard that the Algerian state" will not assume any responsibility
regarding the stalemate that stands in the way of the Maghreb Union."
Source: Sahara
Press Service
This is where you can follow the important socio-economic, geopolitical and security developments, going inside the Republic of Somaliland and Horn of Africa region
Search This Blog
Monday, January 20, 2014
TODAY IN HISTORY - JANUARY 19, 2014.
BY TUNJI OKEGBOLA
Sunday January 19, 2014 the 19th day and 3rd week of 2014, there 346 days and 49 weeks left in the year. Highlights of today in history.
1941 British attack Italians in Africa
On this day, British forces in East Africa, acting on information obtained by breaking the Italians' coded messages, invade Italian-occupied Eritrea-a solid step towards victory in Africa.
British Intelligence had been privy to secret Italian communiqués from Africa for the past five months; every instruction sent from one Italian military unit to another was analyzed by the Brits. The Italian viceroy in Ethiopia was unwittingly receiving and transmitting every Italian military secret-and weakness. Consequently, British forces were able to organize a strategy to advance on Italian-occupied territory, with Italian troop movements in mind.
On January 19, news of an Italian withdrawal from the town of Kassala, in Anglo-Egyptian Sudan, which the Italians had occupied since July 1940, reached British ears. The British garrison there had been slow to react initially to the Italian invasion of Sudan, preferring to wait to get a clearer picture of the Italian invasion strategy for East Africa. The British bided their time by beefing up their forces, especially tank forces, to something closer to parity with the Italians'. The Italian withdrawal from Kassala, a proactive defensive movement, provided the perfect opportunity for Gen. William Platt and the Indian divisions to launch an assault on Eritrea, which bordered Sudan and Ethiopia. It was not long before Italian-occupied Ethiopia and Somaliland fell.
1967 State Burial for Fajuyi
Lt.-Col. Adekunle Fajuyi, former Governor of Western Nigeria, who was killed in the army mutiny of July 1966, will be given a state burial on Saturday, January 28.
Announcing this in Ibadan, Col. Robert Adeyinka Adebayo, Governor of Western Nigeria, said the day would be observed as a public holiday throughout the region. Full military honours will be observed at the burial he said.
Also in Ibadan Yesterday, it was announced that a two man team would represent the region at the state burial of Major –General Johnson Aguiyi Ironsi at Umiahia-Ibeku in Eastern Nigeria on January 20, 1967.
1915 First air raid on Britain
During World War I, Britain suffers its first casualties from an air attack when two German zeppelins drop bombs on Great Yarmouth and King's Lynn on the eastern coast of England.
The zeppelin, a motor-driven rigid airship, was developed by German inventor Ferdinand Graf von Zeppelin in 1900. Although a French inventor had built a power-driven airship several decades before, the zeppelin's rigid dirigible, with its steel framework, was by far the largest airship ever constructed. However, in the case of the zeppelin, size was exchanged for safety, as the heavy steel-framed airships were vulnerable to explosion because they had to be lifted by highly flammable hydrogen gas instead of non-flammable helium gas.
In January 1915, Germany employed three zeppelins, the L.3, the L.4, and the L.6, in a two-day bombing mission against Britain. The L.6 turned back after encountering mechanical problems, but the other two zeppelins succeeded in dropping their bombs on English coastal towns.
1950 Communist China recognizes North Vietnam
The People's Republic of China bestows diplomatic recognition upon the Democratic Republic of Vietnam. Communist China's official recognition of Ho Chi Minh's communist regime resulted in much needed financial and military assistance in Ho's battle against the French in Vietnam, and also pushed the United Statesto take a more intensive and active role in the conflict in Southeast Asia.
French colonialists and Ho's revolutionary forces had been fighting for control over Vietnam since the end of World War II.Although maintaining a neutral public stance, the administration of President Harry S. Truman was actually aiding the French with monetary and material assistance. As the battle dragged on, Ho's government issued feelers to the newly established communist regime in China concerning diplomatic recognition and military and economic assistance. Despite their shared commitment to the communist ideology, the Chinese and Vietnamese also shared a long and acrimonious history of aggression and resistance, so it was not a guarantee that the request would be granted.
China's desire to play a larger role in Asian affairs, combined with its deepening suspicions of French and American designs in neighbouring Vietnam, pushed it toward closer relations with Ho's government. Shortly after the formal declaration of recognition, China began sending large quantities of military aid and many advisors into Vietnam.
1966 Indira Gandhi becomes Indian prime minister
Following the death of Indian Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri, Indira Gandhibecame head of the Congress Party and thus prime minister of India. She was India's first female head of government and by the time of her assassination in 1984 was one of its most controversial.
Gandhi was the daughter of Jawaharlal Nehru, the first prime minister of the independent Republic of India. She became a national political figure in 1955, when she was elected to the executive body of the Congress Party. In 1959, she served as president of the party and in 1964 was appointed to an important post in Lal Bahadur Shastri's ruling government. Soon after becoming prime minister, Gandhi was challenged by the right wing of the Congress Party, and in the 1967 election she won only a narrow victory and thus had to rule with a deputy prime minister.
In 1971, she won a resounding re-election victory over the opposition and became the undisputed leader of India. That year, she ordered India's invasion of Pakistan in support of the creation of Bangladesh, which won her greater popularity and led her New Congress Party to a landslide victory in national elections in 1972.
During the next few years, she presided over increasing civil unrest brought on by food shortages, inflation, and regional disputes. Her administration was criticized for its strong-arm tactics in dealing with these problems. Meanwhile, charges by the Socialist Party that she had defrauded the 1971 election led to a national scandal. In 1975, the High Court in Allahabad convicted her of a minor election infraction and banned her from politics for six years. In response, she declared a state of emergency throughout India, imprisoned thousands of political opponents, and restricted personal freedoms in the country. Among several unpopular programs during this period was the forced sterilization of men and women as a means of controlling population growth.
In 1977, long-postponed national elections were held, and Gandhi and her party were swept from office. The next year, Gandhi's supporters broke from the Congress Party and formed the Congress (I) Party, with the "I" standing for "Indira." Later in 1978, she was briefly imprisoned for official corruption. Soon after the ruling Janata Party fell apart, the Congress (I) Party, with Indira as its head, won a spectacular election victory in 1980, and Gandhi was again prime minister.
In the early 1980s, several regional states intensified their call for greater autonomy from New Delhi, and the Sikh secessionist movement in Punjab resorted to violence and terrorism. In 1984, the Sikh leaders set up base in their sacred Golden Temple in Amritsar. Gandhi responded by sending the Indian army in, and hundreds of Sikhs were killed in the government assault. In retaliation, Sikh members of Gandhi's own bodyguard gunned her down on the grounds of her home on October 31, 1984. She was succeeded by her son, Rajiv Gandhi.
1993 Fleetwood Mac reunite to play "Don't Stop" at Bill Clinton's first Inaugural gala
The band Fleetwood Mac reunited to perform at the recently elected U.S. President Bill Clinton's first inaugural gala.
Fleetwood Mac had faced much intra-band squabbling since their 1970sheyday, why they released one of the biggest albums of all time—Rumours—and a string of decade-defining hits like "Landslide," "Rhiannon," "Say You Love Me" and "Go Your Own Way." And then, of course, there was "Don't Stop" (as in "thinking about tomorrow"), which was candidate Bill Clinton's unofficial theme song during the 1992 presidential campaign.
Along with Truman's "I'm Just Wild About Harry," Eisenhower's "I Like Ike" and Ross Perot's "Crazy," Clinton's "Don't Stop" can certainly be placed within the catchy-and-memorable subset of Presidential campaign songs—in contrast to, say, "Buckle Down with Nixon," "Get on a Raft with Taft" and "Huzzah for Madison." Clinton's theme song may have lacked specificity regarding his political agenda, but it had a good beat, a warm vibe and a chorus that audiences could sing along to. Fleetwood Mac's 1977 recording of "Don't Stop" played in a seemingly endless loop from the night of Clinton's nomination at the 1992 Democratic National Convention that previous summer through to election night in November, so that by the time January rolled around, the mere playing of the record would have seemed a disappointing way to end the evening of the Inaugural gala.
1993 Butcher of Lyons arrested in Bolivia
Klaus Barbie, the Nazi Gestapo chief of Lyons, France, during the German occupation, was arrested in Bolivia for his crimes against humanity four decades earlier.
As chief of Nazi Germany's secret police in occupied France, Barbie sent thousands of French Jews and French Resistance members to their deaths in concentration camps, while torturing, abusing, or executing many others. After the Allied liberation of France, he fled to Germany, where under an assumed identity he joined other ex-Nazi officials in the formation of an underground anti-communist organization. In 1947, the U.S. Counter-Intelligence Corps (CIC) broke up the organization and arrested its senior members, although Barbie remained at large until the CIC offered him money and protection in exchange for his cooperation in countering Soviet espionage efforts. Barbie worked as a U.S. agent in Germany for two years and in 1949 was smuggled to Bolivia, where he assumed the name of "Klaus Altmann" and continued his work as a U.S. agent.
In addition to his work for the Americans, he performed services for Bolivia's various military regimes, especially that of Hugo "El Petiso" Banzer, who came to power in 1971 and became one of the country's most oppressive leaders. Barbie provided a similar expertise for Banzer as he had for the Nazis, torturing and interrogating political opponents and dispatching many of them to internment camps, where many were executed or died from mistreatment. It was at this time that Nazi hunters Serge Klarsfeld and Beatte Kunzel discovered Barbie's whereabouts, but Banzer refused to extradite him to France. In the early 1980s, a liberal regime came to power in Bolivia and agreed to extradite Barbie in exchange for French aid to the destitute nation. In January 1983, Barbie was arrested, and he arrived in France on February 7.
1993 Production begins on Toy Story
The production began on Toy Story, the first full-length feature film created by the pioneering Pixar Animation Studios. Originally a branch of the filmmaker George Lucas’s visual effects company, Industrial Light and Magic (ILM), Pixar first put itself on the map with special effects produced for films such as Young Sherlock Holmes (1985), which featured the first fully three-dimensional digital or computer-generated image (CGI). In 1986, Pixar became an independent company after it was purchased by Steve Jobs, the co-founder of Apple Computer.
The fledgling company’s inaugural product was the Pixar Image Computer, which the former Disney animator John Lasseter soon used to produce an animated short film, Luxo Jr. The film won Best Animated Short at the 1986 Academy Awards, raising Pixar’s profile considerably. Lasseter won another Oscar in 1989 for Tin Toy, an animated short featuring a mechanical drummer named Tinny manoeuvring around in a baby’s playroom. (Tinny later became the basis for Buzz Light-year, the spaceman toy who was one of Toy Story’s main characters.)
In 1991, based on the success of Pixar’s short films, the company signed a $26 million deal with the Walt Disney Company to develop, produce and distribute up to three animated feature films. The Little Mermaid (1989) had become Disney’s most successful film to date, and the company was ready to take more chances on innovative animation techniques. Approached by Lasseter about a possible Christmasprogram, Disney’s chief of film production, Jeffrey Katzenberg, instead responded with the three-picture deal.
Toy Story was the first Pixar-Disney collaboration, and the first feature-length animated film that was completely computer generated. Its plot revolved around the rivalry between the cowboy Woody, previously the favorite toy of a little boy named Andy, and Buzz Light year, a shiny new astronaut toy that Andy receives for a birthday present. Multiple Oscar-winner Tom Hanks lent his famous voice to Woody, while Tim Allen of TV’s Home Improvement was Buzz. Though Pixar’s long development process included drawings, paintings, sculptures and photographs, the final work for the film was all done on computers. The sophisticated animation created a vivid three-dimensional world full of colour and movement, where toys--including such childhood classics as toy soldiers, Mr. Potato Head and Etch-a-Sketch--come to life.
2007 First McDonald's drive-through opens in Beijing
Beijing, China, the capital city of the planet's most populous nation, got its first drive-through McDonald's restaurant. The opening ceremony for the new two-story fast-food eatery, located next to a gas station, included traditional Chinese lion dancers and a Chinese Ronald McDonald. According to a report from The Associated Press at the time of the Beijing drive-through's debut: "China's double-digit economic growth has created a burgeoning market for cars, fast food and other consumer goods. The country overtook Japan last year to become the world's second-biggest vehicle market after the U.S., with 7.2 million cars sold, a 37 percent growth."
Fast-food chains from foreign countries first came to China in 1987, with the opening of aKentuckyFried Chicken restaurant. The home of the Big Mac and Happy Meal arrived in China three years later. In 2005, McDonald's, the world's largest fast-food chain, launched its first drive-through restaurant in China, in the city of Shenzhen in Guangdong province, near Hong Kong. The Beijing drive-through was McDonald's 16th Chinese drive-through. In September 2008, Chinadaily.com reported that other than America, "China is the No. 1 growth market for McDonald's, with 960 restaurants and over 60,000 employees."
McDonald's opened its first drive-through in the U.S. in 1975. Before there were drive-throughs there were drive-in restaurants, where customers would place their orders at curb side speakers. Servers known as carhops, who often wore roller skates, then would bring food orders directly to customers' cars. Standard drive-in fare included hamburgers, hotdogs, root beer and milkshakes. Drive-ins reached the height of their popularity in the 1950s. Today, America's largest chain of drive-in restaurants is Sonic, which started as a hamburger and root beer stand known as Top Hat Drive-In in 1953 in Shawnee, Oklahoma. It changed its named to Sonic in 1959 and today has more than 3,500 drive-ins.
Somaliland: Entertaining a Staunch Unionist in Hargeisa
"Somaliland must realize that its quest to leave the union is growing increasingly untenable" -Aynte & HIPS
Mr.
Abdi Aynte the Chief Honcho of the Mogadishu based Heritage Institute for
Policy Studies-HIPS is doing the official rounds in Hargeisa where he is not
only parleying but breaking bread with senior policymakers.
According
to sources Mr. Aynte and his HIPS outfit are in the country to conduct training
for yet undisclosed beneficiaries most likely the media where he is expected to
impart skills on advocating and lobbying for Federalism which is the main
objective for the existence of the presumably non-profit think tank with the
aim of informing and influencing public policy and practice of course after
engagement with senior Somali policy makers.
Though
having the journalist of reckon in the country conducting trainings, in a
NUTSHELL, his outfit Heritage Institute for Policy Studies is a major detriment
to the aspirations of somalilanders in all fronts but, more so injurious to the
one thing taboo, SOVEREUIGNTY, thence the concern with his presence in the
country where he is parleying or has already parleyed our very own senior
policy makers.
While
fettering the Aynte HIPS in Hargeisa is Questionable the facilitation of an
entry visa and subsequent assignment of a senior Somaliland immigration as
chaperone is amazing
So will
somebody tell what HIPS is doing here, why its boss is being entertained and
chaperoned by senior officials and who actually issued a visa for him?
Meanwhile
we are ears for the enlightenment training to be conducted by HIPS and as usual
to be graced at the opening and closing by who but more than senior
policymakers and other notables.
Finally
good bye the ISTANBUL II Communiqué arrangements of whose non but meeting after
90 days shall materialize.
Finally
again, OR IS THERE MORE THAN MEETS THE EYE HERE?
Final
finally, The HIPS outfit and whoever is associated with it should be in
Mogadishu Somalia TRAINING the SFG on honouring agreements signed after
lengthily and costly deliberations as opposed to being in Hargeisa the nerve
centre for quest of international recognition and Somaliland where he is
chaperoned by a senior policy maker to parley other more senior policymakers
after enjoying local archeology at Las Geel most likely under the sponsor ship
of other more more senior policy makers.
According
to Aynte and HIPS "The recent dialogue between the Somali Federal
Government and Somaliland in Turkey is an encouraging step toward political
reconciliation. Somaliland's grievances based on historical injustices must be
recognized and addressed adequately.
Constitutional guarantees must be
developed to ensure that past mistakes are not made again.
But Somaliland must
realize that its quest to leave the union is growing increasingly
untenable"
About
HIPS
The
Heritage Institute for Policy Studies is an independent, nonpartisan, nonprofit
policy research and analysis institute based in Mogadishu, Somalia.
Mission:
The
Heritage Institute's mission is to inform and influence public policy and
practice in Somalia and the Horn of Africa region through empirical-based,
evidence-informed analytical research, and actively disseminating publications,
and to promote a culture of research.
Vision:
To
serve as a multi-issue think tank and premier public policy research and
analysis institute in Somalia and in the Horn of Africa.
We are
achieving this objective by:
•
Conducting and disseminating high-quality, policy-relevant research.
•
Providing innovative yet practical policy solutions to policymakers.
•
Fostering rigorous discussions on public policy issues among the public.
•
Creating and maintaining unique repository of information database.
Core
Activities:
•
Undertaking empirical-based research and analysis on strategic studies that
affect Somalia and the Horn region, with a focus on conflict, security,
development, socio-economic issues, human rights and foreign policy.
•
Promoting regional cooperation, peace, good governance, democracy, human rights
and freedom of the press.
•
Embarking on a spirited advocacy to inform the public and influence
policymakers.
•
Stimulating public discussions on issues via conferences and seminars.
•
Collaborating with other research institutions; building local research
capacity.
•
Hosting and assisting independent researchers and graduate students.
•
Building and maintaining resource center and depository of knowledge for students,
scholars researchers and policymakers.
•
Establishing public libraries throughout Somalia, starting with a pilot project
in Mogadishu and other major urban centers.
•
Organizing and hosting summer book fairs in Mogadishu.
In-depth Analysis: Political Settlements and State Formation: The Case of Somaliland
This paper asks why large-scale violence was resolved in the internationally unrecognised ‘Republic of Somaliland’ but not in the rest of Somalia.
![]() |
| (Map: Courtesy of WK) |
By Sarah Phillips
The case of Somaliland
offers insights into why some domestic power struggles – including violent ones
– build the foundations for relative political order while others perpetuate cyclesof
economic malaise and political violence.
The unrecognised status of
the Government of Somaliland has made it broadly ineligible for
officialinternational grants and loans, and so it has had to rely more heavily
on its internal capacity to extract capital, whether from its domestic
population or its diaspora. Despite these constraints, Somaliland’s political
and developmental achievements have been relatively impressive – with the most
significant progress being the restoration and maintenance of peace. Its
achievements are most striking when compared to the level of conflict and
poverty presided over by successive governments in southern Somalia –
governments that have been largely underwritten by external political support
and financial assistance.
This paper finds that it
was not simply the lack of direct external assistance that mattered, but the
fact that Somalilanders were not pressured to accept ‘template’ political
institutions from outside and could negotiate their own locally devised, and
locally legitimate, institutional arrangements. There was sufficient time and
political space for solutions to evolve, rather than an attempt to impose
pre-determined institutional end points. The emergence from civil conflict was
out of kilter with conventional conflict prevention programs that emphasise grassroots
consensus and inclusion; it was also coloured by struggles to control the means
of legitimate coercion, and a high degree of collusion between the political
and economic elites.
Finally, the lack of external assistance meant that the incentives for elites to cooperate with one another were primarily local. This was at odds with the way that peace was being pursued in the rest of Somalia at the same time, where vast sums of money were being spent by external actors to bring political competitors to the negotiating table in the hope of forging a durable peace.
Copenhagen International Conference on Western Sahara supports right of Saharawi people to self-determination
Copenhagen, Denmark - An International Conference about Western Sahara, jointly organized by the Danish United Nations Association (UNA) and the Metropolitan University College Saturday in Copenhagen. The Conference was attended by distinguished speakers and more than 150 participants.
The main speakers were: Mr. Francesco M. Bastagli, former UN Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Western Sahara, Mr. Kurt Mosgaard, Major General, former force commander of the UN mission (MINURSO) in Western Sahara, Mrs. Kate Kelly, attorney for the RFK Partners for Human Rights at the Robert F. Kennedy Center for Justice and Human Rights, Mr. Jørgen Estrup, President of the Danish UN Association, Mrs. Eva Flyvholm, International Secretary for the Danish Red-Green Alliance Party, Mrs. Bodil Ceballos, member of Parliament of Sweden for the Green Party and member of the Swedish parliamentary committee on foreign affairs, Mr. Mudassar Kapur, member of Parliament of Norway for the Conservative Party and Dr. Sidi Omar, professor and head of the international Campaign against the Moroccan security wall in Western Sahara
Various speakers reaffirmed the right of the Saharawi people to self-determination through a democratic referendum that has independence as an option, emphasized the respect of human rights and the urgent need that the UN Security Council gives a mandate for MINURSO to monitor and report about human rights in Western Sahara.
“The issue of Western Sahara is an issue of decolonization and self-determination and the legal opinion of the international Court of Justice of 1975 was very clear in this. More than 120 UN resolutions reiterate the Saharawi right to self-determination. Every year the question of Western Sahara is discussed in the UN decolonization Committee,” said Mr. Francesco M. Bastagli, former UN Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Western Sahara
“The UN should assume its obligation in Western Sahara, which is still
one of the 16 remaining non-autonomous territories in the World. The
first violation of human rights in Western Sahara is the denial of
self-determination” continued Bastagli.“The Recommendation of the Kennedy Center for Justice & Human Rights after its visit to the occupied territories of Western Sahara was that the UN should give MINURSO a mandate to monitor and report about Human rights,” Said Kate Kelly, attorney for the RFK Partners for Human Rights at the Robert F. Kennedy Center for Justice and Human Rights
“The Scandinavian Countries should actively support the UN peace process and the MINURSO mandate for human rights.” she added
“I hope that the referendum will be organized soon. My party very much supports the right of the Saharawi people to self- determination. Denmark has voted two times against the fisheries agreement between the EU and Morocco and supports the MINURSO human rights mandate. Denmark should demand the EU to exclude Western Sahara from the EU free trade agreements with Morocco. We cannot accept that EU supports illegal occupation,” said Mrs. Eva Flyvholm, International Secretary for the Danish Red-Green Alliance Party
“Norway does not recognize the sovereignty of Morocco over Western Sahara supports the rights of the people of Western Sahara to self-determination and supports the MINURSO human rights mandate,” said Mr. Mudassar Kapur, member of Parliament of Norway for the Conservative Party
“Sweden always votes against the EU-Morocco fisheries agreement because for us it is a contrary to International law. The issue of Western Sahara should be solved through a democratic referendum with the option of the independence. Sweden supports a MINURSO human rights mandate,” said Mrs. Bodil Ceballos, member of Parliament of Sweden for the Green Party and member of the Swedish parliamentary committee on foreign affairs
“Resolving the Western Sahara conflict on the basis of the free and democratic exercise by the Sahrawi people of their right to self-determination is an indispensable condition for re-establishing regional peace and stability in the Maghreb. It will also lead to eliminating, once and for all, one of the most deep-seated fears in the living memory of the peoples of the region, namely expansionism and territorial acquisition by force, and thus laying the foundations for building trust, a strongly founded peace and regional harmony,” said, Dr. Sidi Omar, professor and head of the international Campaign against the Moroccan security wall in Western Sahara
Several lectures on various topics were presented during this conference about Western Sahara the last colony in Africa, Western Sahara, including: Historic and legal background, the UN peace process, the violations of Human Rights and the illegal agreements with Morocco, the occupying power.
The conference was chaired by Mr. Lave K. Broch from (UNA) and Mrs. Ann Kristina Mikkelsen Bojsen from Metropolitan University College. (SPS)
Sunday, January 19, 2014
Horn Of Africa Polio Outbreak Now At 207 As Somalia And Ethiopia Report New Cases
![]() |
| Horn of Africa Public domain image/ Lexicon at the English Wikipedia project |
Things have been quiet in the countries of the Horn of Africa as far as the polio outbreak, with no news reported cases for some time, until now.
Both Ethiopia and Somalia have recorded two additional wild poliovirus 1 (WPV 1) cases a piece, bringing the outbreak total to 207 (185 from Somalia, 14 from Kenya and eight from Ethiopia).
According to the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI), two new WPV1 cases in Ethiopia were reported in the past week. Both cases had onset of paralysis on 21 October and were reported from Warder district, Somali region.
In Somalia, two new WPV1 cases were reported in the past week. One from Bossaso district, Bari region and one from Bardera district, Gedo region (the most recent case, which had onset of paralysis on 26 November).
The three remaining polio endemic countries all reported new WPV 1 cases during the past week.
In Afghanistan, the most recent WPV1 case had onset of paralysis on 20 December from Watapur, Kunar province.
In Nigeria, two new WPV cases were reported this week – one from Damboa, Borno and one from Kura, Kano.
And in Pakistan, the hardest hit country in 2013, Six new WPV1 cases were reported in the past week. Four from North Waziristan, FATA; one from Khyber, FATA; and one from Karachi Baldia, Sindh.
For more infectious disease news and information, visit and “like” the Infectious Disease News Facebook page and the Outbreak News This Week Radio Show page.
Need editorial assistance in preparing journal articles, dissertations, thesis, grant applications, andreports?Check out XCell Editing for available services and prices
ISTANBUL II COMMUNIQUE: Somaliland and Somalia have agreed on a road map for dialogue in Turkey
Document for the process of political dialogue between the Government of Somaliland and the Federal Government of the Somalia on future relations
19 January 2014
In accordance with framework agreement reached in Chevening, Dubai, Ankara, and Istanbul I, delegations from the Federal Government of Somalia and the Government of Somaliland met in Istanbul between 16-19 January, 2014 with the assistance of Turkish Government.
I. DIALOGUE PROCESS DESIGN
Overall Framework
i. This is a dialogue process between the Government of Somaliland and the Federal Government of Somalia to reach agreement on future relations
ii. The parties are committed to continuing their dialogue in a spirit of mutual respect.
iii. The dialogue will focus on resolving future relations between the two entities.
iv. The parties commit to resolving all problems and disputes in an exclusively peaceful manner.
v. The parties agree to abide by commitments made in the Code of Conduct and Declaration of Principles.
vi. The parties agree to work diligently and in good faith and to ensure full implementation of the agreements reached.
vii. The parties recognise the crucial role that the government of Turkey is playing in promoting the dialogue.
II. Agenda and Substance
i. The focus of the agenda will bethe nature of future relations of the two parties.
ii. The parties will agree to dialogue on other issues of mutual importance and necessity as the need arises.
iii. The parties agree to set agendas in advance of each dialogue session.
iv. The parties will review implementation status of issues that have previously been discussed or agreed upon..
v. The parties agree to update each other on implementation progress with regards to past agreements at the start of each dialogue session.
III. Decision Making
I. The parties will reach decisions by consensus between the negotiation teams.
II. The negotiation teams of the parties will be guided by the inputs and decisions of their principals.
III. Whereas further input and technical assistance is required,the parties jointly communicate their decisions to theirhosting partner.
IV. As necessary meeting of the principals may be called by the two negotiation teams or their agreed partner to resolve deadlock.
V. A joint secretariat will be established in Turkey and it’s functions shall be following:
a. Ensure proper dialogue coordination;
b. Provide logistical, administrative and record keeping to support the process;
c. Support implementation of decisions reached by the negotiating parties.
IV. Sequencing considerations:
i. The parties agree on the framework for the process of dialogue, declaration of principles and code of conduct and commonly agreed international facilitation, establishment of a secretariatin Turkey and select areas of cooperation based on need.
ii. The frameworkfor the process will establish a regular schedule of meetings of 90 days for the negotiation teams.
iii. The heads of the two negotiation teams shall either communicate with each other or hold meeting in six weeksperiod for follow up purposes and in orderto determine the agenda.
iv. In between talks, the parties will agree on initial terms of reference, roles and composition of international facilitation to the process.
v. In advance to any round of dialogue, the parties will develop a preliminary draft declaration on expected outcomes.
V. Participation
A. The partners in the dialogue are the Government of Somaliland and the Federal Government of the Somalia, represented by their delegated negotiation teams.
B. Appreciating the central role that Turkey has played in facilitating previous rounds of dialogue, and recognizing the support received from other international partners, the Parties will decide the scope of the desired continued support they might be in need to advance the process..
C. The parties may seek jointly technical support from neutral and impartial expert organizations for legal advisory purpose.
VI. Implementation
a. The parties agree that the negotiating entities are the immediate implementing authorities of whatever agreements maybe reached.
b. Participation in this implementation process will be confined to the parties in dialogue.
c. The parties will adopt decisions to insure timely and effective implementations of anyagreed outcomes
d. In order to ensure full implementation of agreements, the parties will develop implementation plans, including milestones and agreed oversight, for agreements reached. Progress on these plans will be monitored by the Turkey government
Code of Conduct:
The Parties agree to:
1. Open meetings by the reciting the holy Quran
2. Refrain from inflammatory statements and behavior that will impinge on the objectives and progress of the dialogueand avoid making public statements compromising or undermining the spirit of the negotiation..
3. Agree in advance on joint public statements relating to the dialogue.
4. Develop in advance the agenda for each session and adopt the agenda at the commencement of discussions.
5. Conduct the discussions in an atmosphere of mutual respect and understanding.
6. Respect and uphold the confidentiality of the process and correspondence between the two parties and discussions must be treated as strictly confidential by all involved parties and hosting partner.
7. Commit to peaceful relations and mutual respect and avoidance of all kinds of hostilities.
Declaration of Principles:
Both parties agree to the following principles:
1. The Parties will pursue dialogue towards agreed outcomes and approved the contents of previous agreements which are in the best interests of both parties.
2. The parties enter into the dialogue firmly committed to resolving issues and finding mutually acceptable outcomes.
3. The parties agree to act in accordance with the Code of Conduct and other agreements.
4. The parties will fully facilitate and jointly define areas of cooperation which can meet practical needs ofboth parties.
5. The parties make a firm commitment to the resolution of differences through exclusively peaceful means and dialogue.
6. The parties agree with Turkish Government to provide regular briefing to the international communities.
7. Referring to the Communiqué of the two parties Dialogue in Istanbul, Turkey on 7-9/July 2013. The parties agreed to nominate Air Traffic Control Board to establish within 45 days.
8. The parties agreed to appointan ad-hoc technical committee composed of 4 members, ( two from each party) to prepare the terms of reference of the Air Traffic Control Board. The Technical Committee work will be supervised by the respective two Ministers.
9. We share the pain inflicted upon the Somali people by the military regime in Somalia before the year 1991. We condemn all the atrocities committed by that regime throughout all Somali people particularly the people in Somaliland.
H.E. Abdikarin Hussein Guled H.E. Mohamed Behi Yonis
Minister Minister
The Federal Government of Somalia The Government of Somaliland
Fighting Al Shabab Rebels: Washington’s Terrorism or Counter-terrorism in Somalia?
Somalia has become a breeding ground for Washington’s black operations since 2001, with the African country suffering human losses due to US hegemonic policies.
Only recently, it has been revealed that the US secretly deployed two dozens of troops under the guise of military advisors. It is naïve to think that the US has no ulterior motives other than giving advisory clues to the military men in Somalia or protecting the security of the African people.
In 1993, the US embarked on a military expedition dubbed Operation Gothic Serpent in Somalia under the pretext of eliminating a Somali warlord, an operation which sadly caused massive human losses. Quite naturally, the US swiftly exonerated itself and attributed it to a misstep.
According to Charles William Maynes, editor of Foreign Policy, CIA officials privately concede that the US military may have “killed from 7,000 to 10,000 Somalis during its engagement. America lost only 34 soldiers. Notwithstanding that extraordinary disparity, the decision was to withdraw.” So, the estimates delivered by the US media have been drastically overlooked or underestimated.
The fact is that there is no justification for this human catastrophe. However, as is their wont, Washington officials barefacedly insist that their mission was to capture Somali warlord Mohammed Farah Aidid who was openly opposed to the presence of the US in Somalia.
Later, much to the disappointment of many, this military farce was unfortunately glorified on the screen by Ridley Scott in a movie called Black Hawk Down.
Among other black operations in Somali is a series of killer drone sorties which the US had been carrying out for years without openly acknowledging the fact. It was in 2012 when the White House eventually lifted the lid of secrecy on its black ops in the Horn of Africa and admitted to the crime for the first time.
The US excuse for launching such attacks is the same old story: eradicating the al-Qaeda elements.
A count by the London-based Bureau of Investigative Journalism claims that the US-conducted drone attacks have so far at least 112 Somali militants. This treacherously dubious number excludes the 60 civilians who were killed in the killer drone attacks. Washington’s method of distinguishing between the civilians and non-civilians is understandably strange. Those who are adults are non-civilians and those who are not, are civilians.
Interestingly, the US used to prefer a policy of denial regarding the drone attacks until a few months ago when the CIA acknowledged that the drone attacks in Somalia and other parts of Africa were carried out under the supervision of the espionage agency.
Further to this, there is an active CIA station in Mogadishu. In August, Jeremy Scahill reported on the CIA’s compound at Mogadishu’s Aden Adde International Airport, sating, “the facility looks like a small gated community, with more than a dozen buildings behind large protective walls and secured by guard towers at each of its four corners. At the facility, the CIA runs a counter-terrorism training program for Somali intelligence agents and operatives aimed at building an indigenous strike force capable of snatch operations and targeted “combat” operations against members of Al Shabab.”
According to Scahill, the CIA is not in the least interested in dealing directly with Somali political leaders, who they say are corrupt and untrustworthy. Instead, the United States has Somali intelligence agents on its payroll. Somali sources with knowledge of the program described the agents as lining up to receive $200 monthly cash payments from Americans. “They support us in a big way financially,” says the senior Somali intelligence official. “They are the largest [funder] by far.”
What is the US really doing in Somalia?
A look at the natural resources of this country is enough to provide an answer to this question.
An LA Times article reveals that nearly two-thirds of Somalia’s resources were allocated to theAmerican oil giants Conoco, Amoco, Chevron and Phillips in the final years before Somalia’s pro-US President Mohamed Siad Barre was overthrown and the nation plunged into chaos in January, 1991. Industry sources said the companies holding the rights to the most promising concessions are hoping that the Bush Administration’s decision to send U.S. troops to safeguard aid shipments to Somalia will also help protect their multimillion-dollar investments there.
Officially, the Administration and the State Department insist that the U.S. military mission in Somalia is strictly humanitarian. Oil industry spokesmen dismissed as “absurd” and “nonsense” allegations by aid experts, veteran East Africa analysts and several prominent Somalis that President Bush, a former Texas oilman, was moved to act in Somalia, at least in part, by the U.S. corporate oil stake.
According to a report issued by Range Resources, there are some huge oil seeps in north Somalia (Somaliland) and in the southwest where Ethiopia, Kenya and Somalia meet.
New estimates of the country’s oil reserves, onshore and offshore, run as high as 110 billion barrels. According to the reports, there are likely vast natural gas reserves in Somali waters in the Indian Ocean. Add to that a series of fields which have been found off Mozambique and Tanzania and which contain an estimated 100 trillion cubic feet of gas.
Under the banner of combating terrorism, the ghoul of imperialism intervenes and vindicates its spree killer drone attacks and other inhuman black operations and spares no efforts in reaping the ill gotten benefits of its military lust in the Muslim lands.
Source: Center for Research on Globalization
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)







.jpg)



