By Grace Jean
The principal officer in charge of the US Department of State's Bureau for African Affairs said on 22 February that he expects an increase in government support to help restore peace and democracy in troubled nations, including Mali, that have fallen prey to Islamist radicals.
"We expect we will respond appropriately to threats that emerge in Africa," Ambassador Johnnie Carson, assistant secretary of state for the Bureau of African Affairs, told reporters during a roundtable discussion in Washington. "We will continue to increase our support and assistance to beat that threat."
For the last month, the United States has been providing logistical support to French troops in Mali, where Islamist radicals have been infiltrating the northern region of the country after the democratically elected president was ousted by a military coup in March 2012.
The French intervened with military forces on 11 January to free Mali's northern towns that had been captured by the Islamist militants, part of a group called Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM). The French and West African troops recaptured all three major cities in northern Mali and have also pushed AQIM out of small towns and back up into mountains, said Carson.
This is where you can follow the important socio-economic, geopolitical and security developments, going inside the Republic of Somaliland and Horn of Africa region
Search This Blog
Wednesday, February 27, 2013
ARTICLE 19 STATEMENT: Myanmar: Press bill falls far short of international law and would leave press open to abuse
Despite promises of reform, a new press bill presented in parliament retains a vagueness that will leave the print media open to abuse from the government and other powerful actors.
The draft Press Law Bill (2013) says that the media should become “a fourth pillar” of democracy “watching and guiding the other three”. The media will not however become a fourth pillar under this draft because it undermines their role and overly restricts their work.
Governments often abuse regulation of the press to restrict rather than protect the right to freedom of expression and a free media. Journalists and the press should not be subject under such press regulations to greater restrictions on their right to express themselves compared to ordinary people.
As such, most advanced democracies have abolished any regulation of the press except by general laws. Experiences from other newly democratising states in Eastern Europe for example show that even young democracies do not need a press law.
The bill has both positive and negative aspects. On the positive side, it repeals draconian laws and replaces them with provisions that proclaim human rights. On the negative side it falls substantially below international freedom of expression standards.
Problems in the Press Law Bill
1. Who is a journalist?
Even though the bill refers to the rights and duties of journalists, it is unclear who would be protected under the rights described, and whether for example it includes freelancers or stringers.
Recommendation: Protection should be provided to all journalists working in the country and extended to media workers in general, such as editors, publishers, photographers. A journalist should be defined broadly as anyone who is regularly and professionally engaged in the collection and dissemination of information for the public via any means of mass communication.
2. Reporting regulated by the state
The bill sets out the duties of journalists and aims to regulate issues such as reporting on court cases, children and women, or on poor and disabled people. These duties should not be imposed by the state, which might amount to an interference with freedom of expression that is unnecessary in a democratic society
Recommendation: The press should be encouraged to self-regulate rather than have rules imposed by the state. Journalists and press outlets should be free to adopt and voluntarily follow professional standards of ethics.
3. Overbroad restrictions on content
International law has a clear and non-expandable list of acceptable restrictions to freedom of expression. The restriction in the bill making sure that publications “benefit national and public interest” and that prohibit “provocative expression, “false propaganda” are not among such permissible restrictions..
Recommendation: Only those clear restrictions covered under Article 19(3) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights should be listed in the bill.
4. Freedom of information is limited
The bill limits access to information held by government by excluding “matters of public and national security” and “secret records”. International standards are clear however that all information should be provided to journalists or members of the public, unless the government department can show that they are hiding the information to protect a legitimate aim as listed in law, the disclosure must threaten to cause substantial harm to that aim, and the harm to the aim must be greater than the public interest in having the information.
Recommendation: The bill should not exclude “matters of public and national security” and “secret records” from being accessible, and the government should create a right to information law.
5. Press Council is not independent
The bill preserves a statutory Press Council under the control of the president, therefore placing control and penalties for the press in the hands of the government. The president decides who will be on the council, and as there is no provision covering funding or competence, will presumably decide what it will do, leaving it wide open to abuse.
Recommendation: A press council should be created by the press itself through a process of consultations with participation from all stakeholders. If such a council is mandated by the state in statute, it should include a clear guarantee of independence from government influence.
6. Press outlets require permission or licences
The bill violates international law by requiring press outlets to obtain permission or licences in order to operate. A government that decides who can run a newspaper, magazine or news website in effect controls the media.
Recommendation: No licencing or permissions should exist beyond general laws for businesses such as tax.
7. Foreign publications are still subject to prior-censorship
The bill gives powers to a “respective ministry” to inspect and decide whether imported foreign publications are “capable of threatening the national security and public interest”. By its nature this amounts to prior censorship.
Recommendation: Only courts should have powers to order seizure of publications, be they imported or produced in Burma.
Positive features in the Press Law Bill
A. It repeals draconian laws
The bill will repeal Myanmar’s infamously draconian Printers and Publishers Registration Law (1962) which requires prior-censorship in all forms of media.
B. Journalists are empowered and protected
By proclaiming specific rights, the bill recognises the need for protection of journalists and the press. As the draconian Printers and Publishers Registration Law (1962) does not use the language of rights, it gives no opportunities for journalists and the press to make claims in defence of their interests.
C. Right to freedom of expression proclaimed
Even though Myanmar sits alongside those countries such as North Korea that have not ratified any of the international human rights treaties, the bill proclaims a number of rights aiming at free expression; for example the right to information or the right to express opinions and convictions. In compliance with international law the bill sets out that these rights belong to everyone as opposed to journalists only.
D. Introduction of arbitration for disputes with the press
The bill creates an extrajudicial dispute resolution mechanism by empowering the Press Council to examine in the first instance complaints against the press. Arbitration outside courts provides speediness and reduces cost in many states worldwide, therefore strengthening media freedom. By requiring victims of press violations to go to the Press Council before a court, the bill protects journalists and the press from expensive and intimidating court proceedings.
E. Introduction of the protection of journalists’ sources and the right to accreditations
The bill strengthens the status of journalists by recognising the right to accreditation and the right not to reveal journalists’ sources, as is the norm in most states worldwide.
Next steps
ARTICLE 19 will be carrying out a detailed legal analysis of the draft bill, including specific recommendations that we will put to the government of Myanmar and civil society in the country.
The draft Press Law Bill (2013) says that the media should become “a fourth pillar” of democracy “watching and guiding the other three”. The media will not however become a fourth pillar under this draft because it undermines their role and overly restricts their work.
Governments often abuse regulation of the press to restrict rather than protect the right to freedom of expression and a free media. Journalists and the press should not be subject under such press regulations to greater restrictions on their right to express themselves compared to ordinary people.
As such, most advanced democracies have abolished any regulation of the press except by general laws. Experiences from other newly democratising states in Eastern Europe for example show that even young democracies do not need a press law.
The bill has both positive and negative aspects. On the positive side, it repeals draconian laws and replaces them with provisions that proclaim human rights. On the negative side it falls substantially below international freedom of expression standards.
Problems in the Press Law Bill
1. Who is a journalist?
Even though the bill refers to the rights and duties of journalists, it is unclear who would be protected under the rights described, and whether for example it includes freelancers or stringers.
Recommendation: Protection should be provided to all journalists working in the country and extended to media workers in general, such as editors, publishers, photographers. A journalist should be defined broadly as anyone who is regularly and professionally engaged in the collection and dissemination of information for the public via any means of mass communication.
2. Reporting regulated by the state
The bill sets out the duties of journalists and aims to regulate issues such as reporting on court cases, children and women, or on poor and disabled people. These duties should not be imposed by the state, which might amount to an interference with freedom of expression that is unnecessary in a democratic society
Recommendation: The press should be encouraged to self-regulate rather than have rules imposed by the state. Journalists and press outlets should be free to adopt and voluntarily follow professional standards of ethics.
3. Overbroad restrictions on content
International law has a clear and non-expandable list of acceptable restrictions to freedom of expression. The restriction in the bill making sure that publications “benefit national and public interest” and that prohibit “provocative expression, “false propaganda” are not among such permissible restrictions..
Recommendation: Only those clear restrictions covered under Article 19(3) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights should be listed in the bill.
4. Freedom of information is limited
The bill limits access to information held by government by excluding “matters of public and national security” and “secret records”. International standards are clear however that all information should be provided to journalists or members of the public, unless the government department can show that they are hiding the information to protect a legitimate aim as listed in law, the disclosure must threaten to cause substantial harm to that aim, and the harm to the aim must be greater than the public interest in having the information.
Recommendation: The bill should not exclude “matters of public and national security” and “secret records” from being accessible, and the government should create a right to information law.
5. Press Council is not independent
The bill preserves a statutory Press Council under the control of the president, therefore placing control and penalties for the press in the hands of the government. The president decides who will be on the council, and as there is no provision covering funding or competence, will presumably decide what it will do, leaving it wide open to abuse.
Recommendation: A press council should be created by the press itself through a process of consultations with participation from all stakeholders. If such a council is mandated by the state in statute, it should include a clear guarantee of independence from government influence.
6. Press outlets require permission or licences
The bill violates international law by requiring press outlets to obtain permission or licences in order to operate. A government that decides who can run a newspaper, magazine or news website in effect controls the media.
Recommendation: No licencing or permissions should exist beyond general laws for businesses such as tax.
7. Foreign publications are still subject to prior-censorship
The bill gives powers to a “respective ministry” to inspect and decide whether imported foreign publications are “capable of threatening the national security and public interest”. By its nature this amounts to prior censorship.
Recommendation: Only courts should have powers to order seizure of publications, be they imported or produced in Burma.
Positive features in the Press Law Bill
A. It repeals draconian laws
The bill will repeal Myanmar’s infamously draconian Printers and Publishers Registration Law (1962) which requires prior-censorship in all forms of media.
B. Journalists are empowered and protected
By proclaiming specific rights, the bill recognises the need for protection of journalists and the press. As the draconian Printers and Publishers Registration Law (1962) does not use the language of rights, it gives no opportunities for journalists and the press to make claims in defence of their interests.
C. Right to freedom of expression proclaimed
Even though Myanmar sits alongside those countries such as North Korea that have not ratified any of the international human rights treaties, the bill proclaims a number of rights aiming at free expression; for example the right to information or the right to express opinions and convictions. In compliance with international law the bill sets out that these rights belong to everyone as opposed to journalists only.
D. Introduction of arbitration for disputes with the press
The bill creates an extrajudicial dispute resolution mechanism by empowering the Press Council to examine in the first instance complaints against the press. Arbitration outside courts provides speediness and reduces cost in many states worldwide, therefore strengthening media freedom. By requiring victims of press violations to go to the Press Council before a court, the bill protects journalists and the press from expensive and intimidating court proceedings.
E. Introduction of the protection of journalists’ sources and the right to accreditations
The bill strengthens the status of journalists by recognising the right to accreditation and the right not to reveal journalists’ sources, as is the norm in most states worldwide.
Next steps
ARTICLE 19 will be carrying out a detailed legal analysis of the draft bill, including specific recommendations that we will put to the government of Myanmar and civil society in the country.
Elephant seals help scientists solve climate mystery
The animals, fitted with head sensors, have helped to provide data from the Antarctic's most inaccessible depths
![]() |
| A Southern Ocean elephant seal wears a sensor on its head as it swims in the Southern Ocean, Antarctica. Photograph: Iain Field/Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems CRC/Reuters |
The tagged seals, along with sophisticated satellite data and moorings in ocean canyons, all played a role in providing data from the extreme Antarctic environment, where observations are very rare and ships could not go, said researchers at the Antarctic Climate & Ecosystem CRC in Tasmania.
Scientists have long known of the existence of "Antarctic bottom water," a dense, deep layer of water near the ocean floor that has a significant impact on the movement of the world's oceans.
Three areas where this water is formed were known of, and the existence of a fourth suspected for decades, but the area was far too inaccessible, until now, thanks to the seals.
"The seals went to an area of the coastline that no ship was ever going to get to," said Guy Williams, ACE CRC sea ice specialist and co-author of the study.
"This is a particular form of Antarctic water called Antarctic bottom water production, one of the engines that drives ocean circulation," he told Reuters. "What we've done is found another piston in that engine."
Southern Ocean elephant seals are the largest of all seals, with males growing up to six meters long and weighing up to 4,000kg.
Twenty of the seals were deployed from Davis Station in east Antarctica in 2011 with a sensor, weighing about 100 to 200 grams, on their heads. Each of the sensors had a small satellite relay which transmitted data on a daily basis during the five to 10 minute intervals when the seals surfaced.
"We get four dives worth of data a day but they're actually doing up to 60 dives," he said.
"The elephant seals … went to the very source and found this very cold, very saline dense water in the middle of winter beneath a polynya, which is what we call an ice factory around the coast of Antarctica," Williams added.
Previous studies have shown that there are 50-year-long trends in the properties of the Antarctic bottom water, and Williams said the latest study will help better assess those changes, perhaps providing clues for climate change modeling.
"Several of the seals foraged on the continental slope as far down as 1,800 metres, punching through into a layer of this dense water cascading down the abyss," he said in a statement. "They gave us very rare and valuable wintertime measurements of this process."
source: Reuters
Global warming and airflow changes 'caused US and EU heatwaves'
Air systems that encircle planet can slow to standstill, as greenhouse gas heats Arctic and causes temperature imbalance
![]() |
| Heatwave in 2003 in France. Photograph: Dominique Faget AFP/Getty |
Global warming may have caused extreme events such as a
2011 drought in the United States and a 2003 heatwave in Europe by slowing
vast, wave-like weather flows in the northern hemisphere, scientists said on
Tuesday.
The study of meandering air systems that encircle the
planet adds to understanding of extremes that have killed thousands of people
and driven up food prices in the past decade.
Such planetary airflows, which suck warm air from the
tropics when they swing north and draw cold air from the Arctic when they swing
south, seem to be have slowed more often in recent summers and left some
regions sweltering, they said.
"During several recent extreme weather events these
planetary waves almost freeze in their tracks for weeks," wrote Vladimir
Petoukhov, lead author of the study at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact
Research in Germany.
"So instead of bringing in cool air after having
brought warm air in before, the heat just stays," he said in a statement of
the findings in the US journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
A difference in temperatures between the Arctic and areas
to the south is usually the main driver of the wave flows, which typically
stretch 2,500km- 4,000km (1,550-2,500 miles) from crest to crest.
But a build-up of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere,
blamed on human activities led by use of fossil fuels, is heating the Arctic
faster than other regions and slowing the mechanism that drives the waves, the
study suggested.
Weather extremes in the past decade include a European
heatwave in 2003 that may have killed 70,000 people, a Russian heatwave and
flooding in Pakistan in 2010 and a 2011 heatwave in the United States, the
authors added.
The authors wrote that they proposed "a common
mechanism" for the generation of waves linked to climate change.
Past studies have linked such extremes to global warming
but did not identify an underlying mechanism, said Hans Joachim Schellnhuber,
director of the Potsdam Institute and a co-author, who called the findings
"quite a breakthrough," he wrote. The scientists added that the
32-year-period studied was too short to predict future climate change and that
natural variations in the climate had not been ruled out completely as a cause.
The study only considered the northern part of the globe,
in summertime. Petoukhov led another study in 2010 suggesting that cold snaps
in some recent winters in Europe were linked to low amounts of ice in the
Arctic Ocean.
Drones, Africa and the Decline of American Power
The Counter-Terrorism Diversion
by NORMAN POLLACK
The announcement (Feb. 22)
that the US has opened a drone base in Niger has been deliberately couched in
abstract counterterrorism terms: unarmed Predator drones for reconnaissance
purposes in order to track Al Qaeda and, never to be missed, “its
affiliates.” Who could possibly object to such worthwhile activity?
The New York Times, in its news story, didn’t seem to. And if
polls are any indication, the general effort, especially in that far-off nebula
called Africa, where the baddies, whom we’ve got on the run from Pakistan and
Afghanistan, hang out, has Americans’ rock-solid support.
We know the bit about
“unarmed” and “reconnaissance” is not meant seriously, a Brennan-Obama wink as
it were, because the same introductory ploy was used in Djibouti, where a very
large US drone base was established on those terms, and quickly transformed to
the only real purpose of such an enterprise, i.e., targeted
assassination. Djibouti was carefully selected because of the wide
swath of territory it covered, and because the government was amenable to US
terms, including a status-of-forces agreement, just as now in Niger, in which
US personnel are exempted from local jurisdiction in the commission of
crimes. An ideal situation, in which we can roll up our sleeves and go
after the Enemy, which in the Djibouti case meant al-Awlaki and his son, both
US citizens.
What of course is not
being said, about Niger, Djibouti, and the whole counterterrorism effort is
that, as a result, Africa is “in play” more than previously for American
imperialist activities, which before, could be taken for granted as normalized,
almost routine, exploitation of raw-materials production, but now, with
China’s penetration, and far more sophisticated relationships to the peoples
affected, such as building soccer fields and promoting education, requires of
the US a catching-up phase to hold its own. As with imperialism, whether
or not historically attached to colonialism, the so-called “natives” are a mere
incidental factor in the execution of policy, yet in this case, not only they
but also counterterrorism is incidental to US purposes. Even imperialism
per se begins to blend into a wider framework, which, let’s call, the
geopolitical strategy for a) maintaining the security of capitalism in, and
chief architect of, the world system, and b) buttressing America’s claims to
lead and work advantageously in that system.
We are in Africa whether
or not al Qaeda and “its affiliates” are present, because Africa, in what has
become an increasingly multipolar world, is both ripe for pickings in its own
right and a pivotal sector in the political-economic rivalries of the
Great Powers. Indeed, the fight is also becoming ideological. Just
as we feared Russian penetration outside its immediate sphere of influence
during the Cold War, now it is China, in a Second Cold War, or perhaps the
First continued under new conditions, which we must at all costs prevent from
invading our sphere of influence or testing our military strength.
Bless al Qaeda, it enables us to prosecute our warlike activities against
China! To paraphrase Sartre’s seminal essay on anti-Semitism,
anti-Semitism is about everything except Jews; here, counterterrorism is about
everything but terrorists; and if we didn’t have al Qaeda and “its
affiliates” to contend with, we would have had to invent them, as part of our
desperate attempt to remain the unilateral dominant power on the global stage.
The strain, however, is
showing. The blanket use of assassination, coming directly from the
personal authorization, down to specific targets, of His Majesty POTUS
(and the Svengali-like Brennan always at his ear on the Terror Tuesday
swing-dings off the Situation Room), is itself admission enough to the world
that America, like Rome before it, is beginning its decline, placing it—except
for its huge nuclear arsenal, which partly accounts for the deference still
shown the US by the world community—as one among the many others in the family
of nations, a position ordinarily satisfying to a country, but not to one which
is accustomed to having its own way and, in addition, depends on the huge
defense-cum-military budget to ward off economic stagnation and unemployment
(even here, not succeeding all that well). This airstrip in Niger is more
than the opening of a new front against terrorists. It is a straw in the
wind, embodying the doctrine of permanent war, the necessity for creating an
active regional presence throughout the globe, a forward line of bases to
ensure the stabilization of areas intended for political-commercial
penetration—and, if possible, gain the jump on China.
To falter in this regard
is to risk falling victim to the psychological version of the domino
theory: If the US loses in Africa (incidentally, Niger and Djibouti
nicely complemented each other for controlling the East and West), this will
encourage its (nonofficial) enemies from gaining ground in other areas of US
interest. The unraveling of international power must be stopped.
And behind China, what of Brazil, what of the Third World erupting and
industrializing on its own terms? What of other regions, once drone
warfare and assassination have deprived America of its moral coloring, would
these countries still show deference to America? And in fighting this
rearguard historical battle, the US can enter the realm of still greater
urgency and its soulmate, denial, by fleeing from the major questions
threatening world civilization itself, such as climate change and environmental
degradation, taking refuge in the fairy land of antiscience, as though
challenges to American might and challenges to the well-being of the planet
will alike disappear, if we only close our eyes and keep our finger on the
firing trigger (8,000 miles from target) for further assassinations.
[Here follows my New York
Times Comment (Feb. 23) to the article on Niger drone base. The
objectives of imperialism]:
Why assume the new base in
Niger is directed against Al Qaeda, when in fact the drone presence, necessitating
airstrips, provides the basis for establishing a US regional penetration that
is part of exerting greater political and economic influence in
Africa–head-to-head in competition with China, which has already gained access
to raw materials and investment channels.
Counter-terrorism is a
ploy, a phony diversion, for achieving the classic objectives of imperialism.
The status-of-forces agreement with poor Niger indicates, not respect for
another country, but the forcible wresting of concessions from them. Moreover,
do you really believe the unarmed drones–if such be the case–will remain
unarmed for long? The name of the game is to get inside, then proceed the way
the US planned all the time. Assassination leaves a stain on US foreign policy
which surely will come back to haunt America.
Norman
Pollack is the author of “The Populist Response to Industrial America” (Harvard) and “The Just Polity” (Illinois), Guggenheim Fellow, and professor
of history emeritus, Michigan State University.
The Funniest Logistician in the U.S. Army (So Far)
War Story
By Mark ThompsonFeb. 26, 2013
Army Major Joel Huft is that rare officer who since 9/11
has served in Uzbekistan/Afghanistan (2003), Djibouti (2007) and Iraq (2009).
In this December 2012, interview with the Combat Studies Institute at Fort
Leavenworth, Kansas, you can sense that the 20-year logistician is so in love
with life, with the Army, and his mission that he turns his beans-and-bullets
billet into equal parts Monty Python and War and Peace.
We’re sure that for every reader who’s outraged by what
he has to say, at least two will be delighted. That’s a true force-multiplier
for you. Highlights:
[Tell us about your first deployment in the war on
terror.]
I was in the corps support command (COSCOM) in the 530
Service & Supply (S&S) Battalion. I had just transferred in and had
pissed the battalion commander off really bad and I was there two weeks before
he found an individual augmentee (IA) assignment for me and I went with the
COSCOM to Afghanistan.
I enjoyed Bagram and I spent about a month down in Mazar-e-Sharif,
which was a wonderful little assignment. There was a Jordanian hospital that we
were supporting. So, the Jordanian military had brought in group of doctors and
a little security force, actually Jordanian Special Forces. I have to tell you,
at the time, the Jordanian Special Forces were easily on par with any US mall
security or maybe the Boy Scouts. They were that good. [Laughter]
While I was there, I got to see the neat operations they
had. Primarily it was medical service to people in the area of Mazar-e-Sharif,
so it was a “trail of tears” every morning. They would come in through the gate
and it was a small military enclave, really, a couple of tents and some Hesko
barriers was about all we had inside of the Jordanian base. We had our own
internal perimeter. Every morning they would come in, this “trail of tears,”
people pushing old people in wheelchairs with only three wheels, and every day
they would leave, again a kind of “trail of tears.”
The reason I initially came down there was I led a convoy
down there. This was back in the – - this is why I loved Afghanistan, at this
point it was kind of like the old west. This was the no-shit mission I got,
“Hey, we need an officer to go down on this convoy and this would be great
experience for one of your officers.” It was somebody else’s unit going down
there. They were all non-tactical vehicles. They were five non-tactical
vehicles. They gave me a non-commissioned officer (NCO), so it was me and an
NCO from my organization, three vehicles.
\Three of the other vehicles were from two different
organizations and then the fifth vehicle had some civilian government agency
people that I don’t know anything about other than they were on the convoy with
me and that is really all I know about them. Having said that, their
translation skills did prove useful several times.
That was my convoy. They only communication (comms)
devise I had was an iridium cell phone with a secure sleeve, and the subsequent
little antenna piece that you can hook onto the top of the vehicle. If you have
ever tried to use one of these in the mountains of Afghanistan, you will know
that this is not a very effective comms devise. We were pretty much out of
comms from about two-hours out until about two-hours into Mazar-e-Sharif.
\
While on the convoy we had a series of wonderful
experiences driving down, crossing the border of Afghanistan, then driving on
these roads, trails, mixes. Sometimes, there was one part just south of the
river that was very deserty and there were literally these sand dunes that
would cover the roads, so you would have to Baja around them, through just pure
sand. You couldn’t stop or slow down because it was such a soft sand that you
would stick. It was literally pretty much just as fast as you could go bouncing
through the sand.
At one point the container, we were carrying down a large
propane, very large, filled the whole inside of one of these trucks, with
propane, because they had just built an incinerator device for the medical
waste. It had been building up.
There was a twenty-foot container express (CONEX) full of
amputated parts and gauze that had been sitting all summer that they needed to
burn. That was the most important thing that we had. It was in my vehicle and
as we are bounding along and bounding along it breaks free of its restraints.
It really wasn’t tied down that well and I didn’t know well enough to check.
So as it is bouncing around back there I am like, “Ahhh,
what are you, ahhhh.” You can’t stop. It hits the roof and I hear a “pink,
sssssssss,” so now I have leaking propane in a closed vehicle. You can’t open
the windows because the dust is just so intense. It is bouncing against the
roof, putting dents in the roof, and spewing, sparking, it is a bad situation.
I literally had to put my body on top of this propane
tank, to prevent it from metal on metal and sparking until we can get to a
piece of hardball where we could stop. There’s really nothing I could do but
toss it out of the vehicle. So, the most important thing on the entire mission,
this is one of my lovely stories for mission command, but the most important
thing on the convoy, I had to abandon.
This was early in the war and you are very uncomfortable
abandoning things.
Later on in Iraq, people left everything they could
imagine on the side of the road. But, I was still part of that garrison mindset
that I agonized over leaving a fricking propane tank. You think about what we
have left since then.
So, we get into Mazar-e-Sharif and find out the most important
thing on the convoy wasn’t the propane tank, it was the rubber hosing on the
propane tank. They could get the propane in town; they couldn’t get any of the
hosing. So because I didn’t know to but [sic] the hosing off the tank when I
threw it out it was another month before they could burn all that medical
waste.
Such wonderful mission command, too…My maps, there were
no maps. There were no compasses. What I was given was black and white
photocopied images from previous photographs of intersections with arrows drawn
on them, left or right. It was taken during a different season and it looked to
be at least a year old.
Multiple photocopies, so it was kind of hazy too. It was
okay, because they gave me somebody who had been on the trip. He knew the route.
When I did my convoy commander brief, he had been on the route once and that
was six-months ago and he was a translator, he hadn’t been paying attention.
That is primarily why I think of Afghanistan very much
like the Wild West.
[In Baghdad.]
There we are, we end up going to Baghdad, Iraq to be the
first Advise and Assist Brigade (AAB)in Baghdad. When we arrived we took over
the footprint of two brigades, one in the north, one in the south…
Baghdad still had Baghdad International Airport (BIAP).
It still had all these numerous little FOBs with subsequent units and they all
still needed to be supplied. Being that the combat sustainment support
battalion (CSSB) left, so after the corps support units left, our BSB was the
only support, battalion-sized organization in the entire area and we supported
God and everybody.
That was a fun, fun year. Again, I am sure you have heard
about a lot of people in Baghdad. The neatest personal experience was – - I was
a G3, so I went out of my way to make sure I went on convoys. I went on at
least one convoy a week and I rode with every convoy commander, because we had
gun truck teams. The convoys would rotate in and out, but I had three gun truck
teams that I managed, so I went with them pretty much once, twice a week.
God bless him, he didn’t do a good enough recon and my
intelligence officer (S2) had kind of failed too. They had some route closed.
Here we are going into a FOB and it was one we didn’t normally go into. It was
over by Camp Liberty and ends up taking the wrong, not taking the wrong road,
but taking a road that we shouldn’t have went down.
So, now I have all these 40-foot trucks stuck on a very
narrow small street, downtown Baghdad, not exactly spitting distance from some
very bad neighborhoods, but yet we’re not where we should be. I have about 20
trucks that I have to back up out of this narrow alleyway. I have five gun
trucks, so that means you have got truck drivers, and generally most of our
trucks by this point were KBR trucks that we were escorting. They didn’t have
truck commanders. There is no assistant driver.
Now they were great drivers, but still you have to put
some people on the ground to back them up and if you have people on the ground
you have to have security. So really, I had five gun trucks and basically one
or two extra person per truck. So, at the time I was training my replacement,
so he and I actually got out and stood on the streets of Baghdad providing
security so that we could back these trucks out. I can say I have stood alone
and unafraid on the streets of Baghdad. It was a very interesting experience.
[In Djibouti.]
Joint Task Force – Horn of Africa (JTF-HOA) is a really
neat assignment…at this point [in Germany] I was working in the G1 [personnel
shop], even though I am not a personnel person. Not even remotely good at it,
that is how I found myself in Afghanistan, honestly…
I volunteered for it. It turned out to be the most
amazing experience. When the Army said, “We are going to deploy you to Africa,”
but what they really said, “We are going to send you on a safari.”..
I fly through De Gaulle Airport [Paris, France], which is
the craziest place ever. I, of course, had to transport weapons through there
and the French were a little silly about the weapons, but at any rate, I fly
and I get there.
I will mention that Ethiopian Air is much better than it
sounds. The government does not always pick the cheapest carrier I am sure.
Regardless, I arrive in Djibouti, step off the airport, no one is there to meet
me. IA, I have all these duffle bags and really, I had gone to the tuff boxes,
so I had a couple of tuff boxes, and I had to make sure I got my weapon.
Nobody has probably mentioned this to you, but you wake
up fearing you have lost your weapon. It is an intense experience, especially
like when you come home on mid-tour leave or right after a deployment. You wake
up and think, “Where is my weapon?” It is one of these things they kind of
ingrain in you.
So, I get all my stuff together and there is nobody
there. Nobody there to meet me. I knew there had been prior coordination.
Again, this is a tiny – - it is called an international airport, because it is
an international airport, but it is really one terminal.
You walk off the plank, down the steps. You walk through
this old un-air-conditioned building. They have metal detectors, which I know
for a fact won’t pick anything up, because I walked through, several flights
later I’d gone through with numerous different weapons, not a problem.
No security that I could even really notice. Again,
former French colony, the Djiboutian are pretty laid back for the most part.
Their entire economy seems to exist off of the French forces there and our
forces there. A little bit of shipping, they provide a couple of fuel dumps
that the country provides, but it is primarily a drug-based economy.
The khat, if you heard, they chew this stuff and it is a
basically a mild narcotic. At the time, the cartel that ran it was the
president’s wife. The khat plane came in in the morning with fresh cuttings and
then everyday they flew khat in from Ethiopia or whatnot. The experience was
kind of – - here I am, I don’t know where I am. I don’t know what I am doing.
Again, mission command, I love mission command, throw
people, throw money, throw anything at a problem. I see a Sailor and I am like,
“Hey, are you part of a ship here or part of a base.” He’s like, “Yeah, we are
over at Camp Lemonnier. Nobody’s here to meet you? We’ll take you.” Because
they were waiting on somebody else who was flying in. So here, I am faced with
a decision, “He looks like a Sailor, in a uniform. They have a vehicle, yeah….”
That is how I arrived at Camp Lemonnier, Djibouti, was
catching a ride from a Sailor and a small group of folks. When I got there,
before I went down there I talked to my predecessor about, “Okay, this is the
first time I have been in a real joint environment.” I mean I had kind of done
some joint stuff, but this is joint. “What do I need to do to prepare myself?
What kind of joint publications do should I bring?” He
said, “Ah, don’t bother; we don’t use any of them anyway.” This is 2007, we
still weren’t paying attention to joint operations and I got to see that quite
a bit over the course of the time I was there. I was working in what they
called the J4, which is like any other kind of 4, it is the loggies (logistics
officers).
It was such a neat environment. At that point, the
Marines had transitioned to the Navy, so the Navy was controlling the FOB. They
had some interesting rules. The Navy had this thing they called “liberty.”
Liberty means, for like weekends of passes, you can pretty much go in to town
and as long as you don’t break any of the specific rules and have a battle
buddy, you can go into town, have a dinner. You could drink in town. You could
go to a couple of neat shops, but there was things you could do.
At the same time, they also had cantinas on the FOB. Here
we are in US Central Command (CENTCOM), technically it was still part of
CENTCOM. This was before US Africa Command (AFRICOM) stood up. AFRICOM stood up
in 2008, right at the end of my time there. They had cantinas. They had two
cantinas, with a three-beer limit. I promise you never more than three beers
[holding up five fingers].
They even gave me a card. It was amazing. Here I am in
this pleasant hot desolate country, working in the most joint environment ever.
I mean there were Marine security forces. There were Navy folks operating the
FOB. There were numerous Army units there, to include – - this is in 2007, if
you remember this is during the surge, so while many of my brethren were
suffering in Iraq, we had scraped the bottom of the barrel.
Some of the Army units that were in Djibouti for, not
even just security, but also to conduct tasks that are traditionally Special
Forces (SF) tasks – - train, advise and assist, train some military
(mil)-to-mil training, were being conducted by the Guam National Guard and the
Old Guard out of Washington, DC. That is a ceremonial unit if you are not
familiar with the Old Guard. It is an INF unit, but it is the guys who wear the
wigs and the old uniform stuff. Good times…
Some of the things I learned most about the Navy, their
supply guys are better than ours. They are good. They are very, very good. I can’t,
it is mind boggling how well they are tailored to their job, but they just
don’t get inland operations. I mean that by understating, when you get on a
ship, now granted it is tough. You have to figure out how to pack everything
inside of that ship, so that you have enough stuff for six-months.
If you miss something, you’ve got all the movement
pieces, the FedEx, the DHL and you got all the widgets down to get it to you.
But you are all going to the same place. You’re all traveling in the same
direction. You don’t have to worry about the minutia of the op order with
people flying all over the country, various different locations. You know
trying to make everything sync in the end. Really, it was good to have that
joint environment, because they have a certain expertise and I got to learn a
lot from them…
My area of operations (AO) straddled US Pacific Command
(PACOM), US European Command (EUCOM), and AFRICOM. Anytime I dealt with
anything in those countries, I not only had to deal with the higher combatant
command (COCOM), but I also had to deal with the defense attaché and their
teams in each of their countries.
A neat thing about a joint environment, embassies tend to
be very, they have to be, they have political concerns that we have to take
into consideration. So they tend to be very insular. They tend to be very
protective. Knowledge management with them – - and they worst thing you could
possibly do is have your joint task force’s commanders goals anyway deviating
from the embassy’s goals, because it makes anything done in the country
practically impossible and we had that happen quite frequently.
That’s all kind of good and moot for me. I am a
supporter. I am a logistician. I will do anything I can to make sure that
Soldiers get mail, they get food, they’ve got a roof over their head or at
least something to keep them dry. We had all these little, at one point in the
entire AO there were 47 different little installations, some of them were small
as a five-man CA team up in the far reaches of Uganda, up past Lira, working
with the Ugandans, the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) was very active at the
time.
Then the Karamojong, the Karamojong are these neat
people; they just kind of go all over north central Africa. You have got
southern Sudan, northern Kenya, and these are cattle people and they believe
that every cattle on the face of the earth belongs to them. Whenever they see
cattle, they take the cattle.
They are kind of rustlers. We had been trying to work
with the government to do a guns for cows. You know, “You give us the guns and
we will give you the cows. We will give you cows.” Which is all fine and good
except from the Karamojong perspective, “If I have a gun, why do I need you to
give me a cow?” Fun times…
Contentions and contracting was another very valuable
lesson there. One of the problems we had was there wasn’t a lot – - being joint
and being so dispersed and not really having a central theme or effort, at
least not that I could tell at the joint staff level.
We had units coming in doing things and we had no idea
about them. I remember one time, I had a team that had gone into Ethiopia and
they had set up a little safe house and they had done all that with field
ordering officer (FOO) funding, FOO ops.
When they came back, they asked, “Hey, we would like some
things.” I am like, “Sure, what do you need?” “Okay, well we are going to need
regular food. We are going to need electricity. We are going to have fuel
brought to us.”
“Okay, when are you setting this place up?”
“Oh, we have been there a month.”
Those were the kind of challenges that you had. One of my
initiatives that I really enjoyed was the newcomers brief. I just made sure
that I stressed, I had this – - I like talking, so I had put together a fairly
fun brief to cause people to remember that, “When you are going to do
something, you may need something, come talk to the J4.” “Because you may think
you need tents, but then would you like lights for the tents, would you a
generator for the lights, would you like cots?”
Because it is just one of those things. I have lived
supporting maneuver people, I truly do. There is no body better to be able to
tell you actions on the objective. They can, down to the minutia, they can tell
you where every Soldier is going to be. They can tell you how many rounds they
are going to expend. Where they are going to use what. They know actions on the
objective. They may even know how they are going to get to the objective.
They may know that, but five minutes after they have
taken the objective, they are clueless. [Laughter]
Helping people realize what they need or what you need
from them to tell them I’ll provide them what they need has been a great, great
challenge and joy for the last twenty years…
[Did you know going into Djibouti what you were going to
be doing?]
Not a fricking clue. Could not have told you what I was
going to do.
[Nothing like, "Here is my job description. Here are
my responsibilities. Here is what I am going to do."]
Nope, nope…There was a position on a joint manning
document and there was no real descriptor there. I kind of made a job. It is
not that there weren’t things to do, but I kind of had to make a niche for
myself. Fine, fine, supply…
See the Navy, there supply people only focus on supply.
They don’t focus on anything else. That is their job. They are not what they
call line officers, so they can’t command. The Army’s got a philosophy that
everybody needs to be able to lead, so we don’t get to specialize near as much
as the Navy really does…
There was a rotator [aircraft] and then occasionally we
could get a special move in. The rotator pretty much came out of Bahrain and it
was one flight a week. We got one C-130 a week and we had to use it very, very
carefully. Generally, it would hit Djibouti, then it would hit Kenya, and then depending
on the timeframe it might hit Uganda and then Tanzania every other month or
something like that. We got it up to once a month for certain. Then when we had
to do special Seabee missions or something like that we could get some extra
birds.
I retrograded some stuff out of there so I got a C-5,
because it was too big. There were some well drilling trucks that I couldn’t
get rid of. That was a fun time too. Again, such a chaotic place. Never got
shot at while I was there, there were some instances, but I never got shot at
while I was there. At the same time, there was no rhyme or reason.
There was a National Guard well drilling unit that had
left prior to me arriving. They had turned all of their equipment over, this is
home station unit equipment, they had turned it all over to a Reserve
well-drilling unit. You can’t just give equipment from one Title 22 to another
Title 22 organization and not to a Title 10. The National Guard cannot, a unit
cannot chose to give equipment to the Reserves and vice versa. But, that is
what they did.
Then I couldn’t get it back to the original unit, because
they had taken well-drilling completely out of the National Guard. It could
have been Reserve to National Guard or vice versa, I don’t remember which. One
of them no longer has any well drilling. So then what do I do with this? It is
a national level thing to transfer this equipment, because of the title of the
money. I finally got Army Forces Central Command (ARCENT) to weigh in and they
sent me an old sergeant major and a chief to help me get the stuff fixed and
running.
We were going to ship it back to, first to Kuwait,
because we didn’t have to worry about any environmental things, so they could
clean it up and send it back to the States and refurbish it and so all that
good stuff. Using the big Army, I managed to make that happen. My single
greatest joy is we tried to ship it out of there. We tried to do all sorts of
stuff to get it out of there. I spent four months probably working on this
stupid thing. They were big ugly messed-up trucks. This unit had left their
weapons in a CONEX when they left.
They left one poor staff sergeant (E6) to handle
everything before they went ahead and went back, so he stuck around as long as
he could and no solution for him, so he left. Again, it’s just not knowing who
to talk to and having to go back and dig through all the records to try to
figure this stuff out.
I have long hated the Air Force and it is not just a like
a personal grudge, it is a passionate hatred for the Air Force. In Afghanistan,
everywhere I have been, they have done some really stupid, fucked-up stuff.
Because they don’t want to stay in one country, the will do anything they can
not to break crew so they don’t have to stay in that country – - to include fly
off without delivering fresh food and vegetables.
How can you leave 3500 people without any fresh fruit and
vegetables for a week? You know, lettuce gets pretty moldy after a week. Just so
they can go back to Germany and get a nice hotel room. Same thing down in
Africa too. They would do anything to get out of Djibouti.
Djibouti, I can’t tell you how nasty that place was, but
if you got into Kenya it was this lush, verdant, beautiful place. You would fly
into Entebbe and you’ve got the big Lake Victoria there. Because there were
security requirements and there are no security forces, you had to stay in
hotels that had security guards. So, to have armed guards, you were pretty much
staying in four- and five-star hotels. Yeah, of course, they wanted to break
down in Kenya versus Djibouti.
At any rate, here is one of my few great chances at
revenge. We have a C-5 coming in there. I know for a fact that these trucks
will start, but once you turn them off they weren’t starting again; they were
done.
So, we kept them running [Laughter] to get them on the
C-5 and that was it. We turned them off and it was there problem on the other
end. [Laughter]
I actually take great pride in having done that. I know
it is wrong. It’s wrong on so many human levels, but I can’t tell you the
number of times the Air Force has dropped a load on me. Pushed the, to the
left… In fact redeploying from Afghanistan, they held out entire unit overnight
because a general officer (GO) wanted to fly on our aircraft, but he wanted to
get rest first before flying back for a meeting in Germany.
I get it. GOs have got important stuff, but we were on
the bird when they cancelled the flight, redeploying after, at that time they
were shorter deployments, we were only nine-months, but still. Yeah, I am not
going to go into all that. And, my brother is Air Force. The things that he
takes great pride in are things that I as a Soldier feel shameful about. If
that makes any sense.
Now don’t get me wrong that is a great organization, it
really is. There is a need for it to be separate. But, they are, with the
exception of some fighter pilots, who have their own multi-zipper, sun god
issues, they really are the bus drivers of the air.
They are more technicians than they are Soldiers, that is
for sure. They can outsource those pilot jobs to drones now a days…
Then we periodically, 90 percent of what was being done
in Djibouti in 2007 was really on the, in the full spectrum scheme, it was
really humanitarian aid. It was mil-to-mil training, that kind of stuff. There
is about a ten percent kinetic piece. There were some SF guys, of some form,
that would periodically disappear and then somebody else would disappear and
they would come back. Supporting them was sometimes very interesting. I
remember one request, they came to me, “I need as many non-tactical vehicles
(NTVs) as you can give me.”
“When do you need them?”
“Tonight.”
“How many do you need?”
“Thirty.”
I had to go around the FOB and pull vehicles from people
just so I could give them enough vehicles with no notice, so that they could do
and do whatever they were going to do. It was probably a party down at the
embassy. I don’t know. [Laughter]…
[So you have some challenges. What were your successes?
Besides getting rid of the well drilling equipment.]
I got to tell you there was a poker team. It was a poker
club, because we had the cantinas. There were two lax periods, there were half
days on Sunday and on Friday, because Friday was the Islamic day off and Sunday
is kinds of ours. Thursday night and Saturday night were poker nights and I got
very, very good at seven-card poker. I got very good at that. [Laughter]…
[Did you have much interaction with civilians in
Djibouti?]
In Djibouti, yes. There were a number of vendors we
worked through to get local materials. One of my biggest frustrations is there
are certain laws for contracting. There are things you can and cannot contract,
the things you can and cannot buy. Somebody has mentioned to you about
containers and about leasing containers by now, I am sure.
Okay, when I was in Afghanistan in 2003, I said, “Why
don’t we just buy these containers?” Milvans, civilian 20, 40-foot containers.
We couldn’t buy them, so we have been leasing them.
Eleven years now. We have paid for these things five, six times over.
We were leasing cars because we couldn’t buy NTVs. We
were leasing cars at $50,000 a year for a beat-up SUV. Could have bought two or
three trucks for that.
“Well, it’s got the maintenance package included in it.”
[Any other specific memories of Djibouti?]
My predecessor was a National Guard guy and he ended up
having a little bit of linger, [Laughter] go home. So he spent about another
month on the ground after I got there, so him and an Air Force guy, they were
big bikers.
Djibouti, just on the south side of the city is where
Camp Lemonnier is. You are about ten miles from the Somali border. So, he, I
and I can’t remember the Air Force bubba’s name, took out some MWR bikes and we
rode down to the border of Somalia, just so we could enter Somalia.
Now granted, this part of Somalia is not like Mogadishu
(Mog).
This is the old British Somaliland. These people are
humans. [Laughter] It wasn’t quite like the Mog, but we did kind of sneak over
the border and back once. That was a very unique experience.
I had a Navy chief petty officer and he was from the
Philippines and the Guam National Guard was there and they had a connection.
Somehow, they managed to go out and fish, so they would come back and we would
occasionally have a good cookout with like some fresh fish.
He was a supply guy, he was a chief, so somehow he got
the – - it wasn’t KBR, it was a different contract down there at the time, a
Navy contract at the time – - he would get some fresh fruits and vegetables. We
had the cantinas. You had a three-beer limit, by the way I am holding up five
fingers. [Laughter]
Every so often, you would have a lot of fun. That was it
was a very interesting experience personally and again, I just kind of fell
into it. I have led a charmed life. I truly have.
I have been in some nasty places in Afghanistan early on
and I would literally, I would have – - at Bagram, I was inspecting the fuel
delivery. We had established an assault hose line so the trucks could stay
outside and download through a 500-meter hose versus bringing a potential bomb
inside the FOB. It was a good thing. I was inspecting it. The very next day a
guy had to go out the gate, I was no body armor at that time, it was flak vests
if you wore them. So, I was outside the front of the gate wandering around. The
very next day, somebody got shot doing something similar.
In Baghdad, at Ur, right outside of Sadr City, that place
was always getting hit. I went and spent three days there, nothing happened.
They had had a firefight the night before I got there. I was there for three
days, nothing happened while I was there. They left and one of the contracted
security guards took a rocket-propelled grenade (RPG). I will literally land at
a FOB that had just been mortared.
In the HOA, bad accident in front of me. They don’t have
quite the same standards. You know, there are piles of dead bodies on the road
in front of me. Thirty-seconds is all it would have taken for me to have been
involved in the accident. I have truly led a charmed life.
Greater Horn of Africa Climate Outlook Forum assesses 2013 March-May rainy season
The Greater Horn of Africa Climate Outlook Forum has issued its seasonal predictions for the forthcoming March-May rainy season which is vital to agriculture and food security in a region that has been hit by both droughts and floods in recent years.
There is an increased likelihood of near normal to below normal rainfall over much of the northern part of South Sudan; southern Sudan; northern and eastern Ethiopia; eastern half of Kenya; Somalia, and eastern parts of Tanzania, according to the outlook. Specifically, it indicated a 45 percent probability of near normal rainfall, a 35 percent probability of below normal rainfall, and a 20 percent probability of above normal rainfall in these areas.
Burundi; Rwanda; Uganda; southern parts of South Sudan; southwestern and central Ethiopia; western and central Kenya as well as western half of Tanzania have an increased likelihood of normal (45 percent) to above-normal (percent) rainfall in March-May, it said, noting a 20 per cent probability of below normal rainfall in these areas.
The climate outlook was issued at the end of a meeting organized by the Intergovernmental Authority on Development Climate Prediction and Applications Centre (ICPAC), 18-20 February in Bujumbura, Burundi. Factors taken into consideration included sea surface temperature conditions over the Western Indian and eastern tropical Atlantic Oceans, as well as neutral El Niño Southern Oscillation conditions over the tropical Pacific Ocean. Key processes considered also included, the Indian Ocean Dipole, monsoonal wind systems over the region and tropical cyclone activities over Indian Ocean sub region.
The Climate Outlook Forum brought together national experts from countries in the Greater Horn of Africa, along with regional and international experts involved in seasonal climate prediction and users of climate early warning advisories from sectors such as food security, health and water resources and for disaster risk reduction.
March to May constitutes an important rainfall season over the equatorial parts of the Greater Horn of Africa (GHA) region.
Parts of the Greater Horn of Africa were ravaged by severe drought in 2010/2011 followed by excessive rains in various equatorial areas including parts of Kenya and southern Somalia.
The outlook is relevant only for seasonal time scales and relatively large areas. Local and month-to-month variations might occur as the season progresses. Regional forecast updates will be provided by ICPAC while National Meteorological and Hydrological Services will provide detailed National Updates.
WMO has been supporting Regional Climate Outlook Forums around the world, ever since the inception of the first forum in Southern Africa in 1997. Regional Climate Outlook Forums presently serve more than half the world’s population.
There is an increased likelihood of near normal to below normal rainfall over much of the northern part of South Sudan; southern Sudan; northern and eastern Ethiopia; eastern half of Kenya; Somalia, and eastern parts of Tanzania, according to the outlook. Specifically, it indicated a 45 percent probability of near normal rainfall, a 35 percent probability of below normal rainfall, and a 20 percent probability of above normal rainfall in these areas.
Burundi; Rwanda; Uganda; southern parts of South Sudan; southwestern and central Ethiopia; western and central Kenya as well as western half of Tanzania have an increased likelihood of normal (45 percent) to above-normal (percent) rainfall in March-May, it said, noting a 20 per cent probability of below normal rainfall in these areas.
The climate outlook was issued at the end of a meeting organized by the Intergovernmental Authority on Development Climate Prediction and Applications Centre (ICPAC), 18-20 February in Bujumbura, Burundi. Factors taken into consideration included sea surface temperature conditions over the Western Indian and eastern tropical Atlantic Oceans, as well as neutral El Niño Southern Oscillation conditions over the tropical Pacific Ocean. Key processes considered also included, the Indian Ocean Dipole, monsoonal wind systems over the region and tropical cyclone activities over Indian Ocean sub region.
The Climate Outlook Forum brought together national experts from countries in the Greater Horn of Africa, along with regional and international experts involved in seasonal climate prediction and users of climate early warning advisories from sectors such as food security, health and water resources and for disaster risk reduction.
March to May constitutes an important rainfall season over the equatorial parts of the Greater Horn of Africa (GHA) region.
Parts of the Greater Horn of Africa were ravaged by severe drought in 2010/2011 followed by excessive rains in various equatorial areas including parts of Kenya and southern Somalia.
The outlook is relevant only for seasonal time scales and relatively large areas. Local and month-to-month variations might occur as the season progresses. Regional forecast updates will be provided by ICPAC while National Meteorological and Hydrological Services will provide detailed National Updates.
WMO has been supporting Regional Climate Outlook Forums around the world, ever since the inception of the first forum in Southern Africa in 1997. Regional Climate Outlook Forums presently serve more than half the world’s population.
Shan Dal oo midawga Yurub ah oo mar kali ah shan Safiir u soo magacawday Somaliya iyo Madaxweynaha oo qaabilay
Madaxweynaha Jamhuuriyadda Federaalka Soomaaliya Mudane Xasan Sheekh Maxamuud ayaa Villa Soomaaliya ku qaabilay safiiro cusub oo ay soo magacaabeen 5dal oo ka tirsan Midowga Yurub
Waxaa kulankan ka qeyb-galay Raisul Wasaare Ku Xigeenka Ahna Wasiirka Arimaha Dibadda Marwo Fowziya Yusuf Hagi Adam Wasiirul dowlaha Wasaaradda Arimaha Dibadda Mudane Dr. Maxamed Nuur Gacal iyo Agaasimaha Guud ee Madaxtooyada Kamal Dahir Xassan (Gutaale).
Safiiradda cusub ayaa waxay kala yihiin Ambassador Margit Hellwig-Bötte oo ka socota dalka Jarmalka, H.E. Etienne De Poncins,Fransiiska, Ambassador Javier Herrera García-Canturri Spain,Ambassador.Bart Ouvry Beljinka, Ambdbassador Sofie From-Emmesberger oo ka socoatay Finland.
Madaxweynaha ayaa wuxuu yiri ”Maanta aad ayaan ugu faraxsanahay in aan soo dhaweyno xiriika diblomaasiyeed ee nagala dhaxeeyo shan dal oo cusub.Soomaaliyana si tartiib ah ayey waxey dib ugu soo dhex muuqatay beesha caalamka. Waxaana sabab u ah taageradda ay la garabtaagan yihiin dalal ay ka mid yihiin Fransiiska, Jarmalka,Spain,Beljinka, iyo Findland oo qeyb ka qaadanayo horumarka iyo xalinta dhibaatada ka taagan Soomaaliya.
Dowladda Soomaaliya waxeey diyaar u tahay marwalbo in ay idin soo dhaweeyso.Waxaa naga go’an inaan xoojino xiriirka u dhaxeeyo Soomaaliyo iyo dalalkiina.’“
Ilaa iyo markii uu Madaxweyna Xassan la wareegay Madaxtooyadda ayaa waxaa soo kordhayo dalalka dib u soo celinayo xiriirkii kala dhaxeeyo Soomaaliya .Kadib, markii u Madaxweynaha booqday xarunta Midowga Yurub ee Brussels dhamaadkii bisha Janaayo si u gudbiyo fikirkiisa siyasadeed ee ku saleysan Lixda Tiir Siyaasadeed oo hormuud ay ka yihiin, waxka qabadka amniga,cadaaladda,maareynta dhaqaalaha,horumarka iyo ,dib-u heshiisiinta .
Wixii Faah-faahin ah kala xiriir:Malik Abdalla Agaasimaha Warfaafinta, Villa Soomaaliya,media@presidency.gov.so
Waxaa kulankan ka qeyb-galay Raisul Wasaare Ku Xigeenka Ahna Wasiirka Arimaha Dibadda Marwo Fowziya Yusuf Hagi Adam Wasiirul dowlaha Wasaaradda Arimaha Dibadda Mudane Dr. Maxamed Nuur Gacal iyo Agaasimaha Guud ee Madaxtooyada Kamal Dahir Xassan (Gutaale).
Safiiradda cusub ayaa waxay kala yihiin Ambassador Margit Hellwig-Bötte oo ka socota dalka Jarmalka, H.E. Etienne De Poncins,Fransiiska, Ambassador Javier Herrera García-Canturri Spain,Ambassador.Bart Ouvry Beljinka, Ambdbassador Sofie From-Emmesberger oo ka socoatay Finland.
Madaxweynaha ayaa wuxuu yiri ”Maanta aad ayaan ugu faraxsanahay in aan soo dhaweyno xiriika diblomaasiyeed ee nagala dhaxeeyo shan dal oo cusub.Soomaaliyana si tartiib ah ayey waxey dib ugu soo dhex muuqatay beesha caalamka. Waxaana sabab u ah taageradda ay la garabtaagan yihiin dalal ay ka mid yihiin Fransiiska, Jarmalka,Spain,Beljinka, iyo Findland oo qeyb ka qaadanayo horumarka iyo xalinta dhibaatada ka taagan Soomaaliya.
Dowladda Soomaaliya waxeey diyaar u tahay marwalbo in ay idin soo dhaweeyso.Waxaa naga go’an inaan xoojino xiriirka u dhaxeeyo Soomaaliyo iyo dalalkiina.’“
Ilaa iyo markii uu Madaxweyna Xassan la wareegay Madaxtooyadda ayaa waxaa soo kordhayo dalalka dib u soo celinayo xiriirkii kala dhaxeeyo Soomaaliya .Kadib, markii u Madaxweynaha booqday xarunta Midowga Yurub ee Brussels dhamaadkii bisha Janaayo si u gudbiyo fikirkiisa siyasadeed ee ku saleysan Lixda Tiir Siyaasadeed oo hormuud ay ka yihiin, waxka qabadka amniga,cadaaladda,maareynta dhaqaalaha,horumarka iyo ,dib-u heshiisiinta .
Wixii Faah-faahin ah kala xiriir:Malik Abdalla Agaasimaha Warfaafinta, Villa Soomaaliya,media@presidency.gov.so
Djibouti: Observers Declare Djiboutian Election Legitimate, Opposition Plans Protest
DJIBOUTI — Djibouti security forces fought running battles with opposition supporters Tuesday for a second day in an attempt to disperse protests against the ruling coalition's parliamentary election victory, witnesses said.
Djibouti hosts the United States' only military base in Africa and is an important ally in the U.S.-led fight against militant Islam. The former French colony's port also is used by foreign navies protecting the Gulf of Aden's shipping lanes, some of the busiest in the world, from Somali pirates.
Riot police fired tear gas to scatter hundreds of chanting demonstrators outside the Justice Ministry who were demanding the release of Sheikh Bashir Abdourahim, a prominent opposition figure whose family said he had been arrested on Monday.
"Not only did they steal our election victory, they're throwing into jail the people we voted for,'' Ali Saleh, a university student, told Reuters.
Protesters pledged to keep up the unrest until President Ismail Omar Guelleh's government collapses.
The dispute over the poll raises the possibility of instability in the tiny but strategically important Red Sea state.
Guelleh's Union for the Presidential Majority (UMP) declared victory in the election, claiming 49 out of the National Assembly's 65 seats.
The opposition rejected the vote as flawed and promised demonstrations.
International observers, however, reported no major incidents during the electoral process.
Guelleh has presided effectively over a one-party state since coming to power in 1999. The opposition accuses the 65-year-old leader of mounting oppression against Djibouti's 920,000-strong population.
Relatives of Abdourahim, a moderate Islamist who heads the Movement for Democracy and Freedom [MODEL] party, said he had been badly beaten during his detention.
In a radio broadcast, Interior Minister Hassan Darar appealed for calm, but made no reference to Abdourahim. Authorities have not confirmed his arrest.
Ethiopia bans NGOs
Ethiopia bans NGOs 

Ethiopia on Friday banned three civic organisations accusing them of doing 'illegal religious activities.'
The ban came at a time when Ethiopian muslims are protesting against perceived government interference in their activities.
No further details were made available by the government on the alleged illegal activities that led to the ban.
Observers fear the latest move by the government would spark protests by muslims in the Horn of Africa country.


One Euro, Islamic Cultural and Research Center and Gohe Child, Youth and Women Development were affected by the ban.


Ethiopia has banned a number of non governmental organisations since it introduced the Civic Organisations Law two years ago.
The law seeks control operations of NGOs and their source of funding.


According to the law, any civic group that receives more than 10 percent of its funding from foreign sources cannot be involved in human rights advocacy or capacity building, among other activities.


The Ethiopia Civic Organizations Registrar said the banned organisations were using money from donors to fund personal affairs.
The agency said it had also sent a warning to some 109 civic organisations considered to be violating the law.


Ethiopia has 2,854 registered civic and charity organisations.
The ban came at a time when Ethiopian muslims are protesting against perceived government interference in their activities.
No further details were made available by the government on the alleged illegal activities that led to the ban.
Observers fear the latest move by the government would spark protests by muslims in the Horn of Africa country.


One Euro, Islamic Cultural and Research Center and Gohe Child, Youth and Women Development were affected by the ban.


Ethiopia has banned a number of non governmental organisations since it introduced the Civic Organisations Law two years ago.
The law seeks control operations of NGOs and their source of funding.


According to the law, any civic group that receives more than 10 percent of its funding from foreign sources cannot be involved in human rights advocacy or capacity building, among other activities.


The Ethiopia Civic Organizations Registrar said the banned organisations were using money from donors to fund personal affairs.
The agency said it had also sent a warning to some 109 civic organisations considered to be violating the law.


Ethiopia has 2,854 registered civic and charity organisations.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)







