This is where you can follow the important socio-economic, geopolitical and security developments, going inside the Republic of Somaliland and Horn of Africa region
Search This Blog
Saturday, December 29, 2012
Jewish Home Surges in Polls: Israeli Politics Heads Even More Rightward Likud-Beiteinu Struggling to Hold Off Challenges
A new round of polls shows the Jewish Home (Habayit Hayehudi) continuing to surge as an even farther-right alternative to the Likud-Beiteinu list, and leaving little doubt that Israel’s already far-right voter base is continuing to shift.
The surge in Jewish Home is led in no small part by former Netanyahu aide Naftali Bennett, who is scoring big both as a multi-millionaire business mogul and as a religious far-right ideologue who condemns the notion of Palestinian statehood on general principle in favor of a Greater Israel.
This is problematic for Netanyahu on a number of fronts, as he has already alienated the religious right by throwing his lot in with Avigdor Lieberman, whose star is falling as his legal troubles mount, and is struggling to keep the joint list just barely palatable to the international community while facing accusations of being “soft” for not taking as sociopathic of a hard-line as his newfound rivals.
Likud-Beiteinu has scrapped any endorsement of a two-state solution in its platform, but with “moderate” Likudniks already uneasy about their alliance with Lieberman and with the expulsion of their more moderate MPs, it will be difficult for them to go a step farther and scorn the idea of peace the way Bennett’s bloc is. This is costing them the extreme hawkish vote in the polls, while Home is scooping up votes from the fashionable religious right as well as the fringe.
This should leave them a force to be reckoned with after the election, but leaves the path to majority government even less clear, as Likud-Beiteinu seems unlikely to partner with them or the center-left, and the really-far-right doesn’t appear to have enough seats to govern without Lieberman and Netanyahu.
9/11 Revisited: The Unjustifiable Launch of Endless War
by grtv
Guiletto
Chiesa, former MEP and producer of the 9/11 documentary, "Zero,"
presents at the 9/11 Revisited: Seeking the Truth conference in Kuala
Lumpur on November 19, 2012.
Produced by James Corbett
US-NATO-Israeli Agenda: Syria to be Subdivided into “Three Weaker States”
Global Research, December 28, 2012
Egyptian media pundit Tawfik Okasha,
owner of the Egyptian opposition TV channel al-Fara’een, blamed the
Mainstream Media of being complicit with the Muslim Brotherhood in
feeding the Egyptian people lies about the Syrian crisis.
Transcript of Tawfik Okasha’s statement
Bashar Al Assad’s war is with Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood.
The issue is not about Bashar it is about the destruction of Syria and its transformation into three states
It is about Syria being owned by the
muslim Brotherhood and its Security Apparatus being destroyed and
replaced by that of the Muslim Bportherhood. There’s a deal being struck
between Israel, Turkey and the EU to transform Syria into three states,
so that the issue of the Golan Heightsa as well as Syria. So there
won’t be any state that will have armed forces capable of confronting
Israel.
The issue is about the destruction of the Syrian Army asnd the destruction of the Syrian leadership and the Syrian Armed Forces
You liars, you who tell the Egyptian
people lies upon lies, You tell them that Bashar al Assad is
slaughtering people. Bashar al Assad’s war is with Al Qaeda and the
Muslim Brotherhood, It is with those people sent in by Turkey, the US
and Israel,
US Special Forces Accused of Raping Afghan Women During Raid
Special forces of the US army raided houses of villagers and
separated the men and women of 15 families living in this village. They
then raped a number of these women.
According to a report in the political section of the Afghanpaper, authentic reports given by the people state that special US forces raped a number of women in a village of Afghanistan, after attacking it.
US Special forces based in Afghanistan, raided a village in Chahar Bolak area of Balkh province at night, some days back (we apologize for not naming the village for certain reasons), and committed a horrendous crime. They raided houses of villagers and separated the men and women of 15 families living in this village. They then raped a number of these women.
The commander of the US soldiers warned the people of the village that this crime will be repeated should they complain to the authorities.
Since the occupation of our country by US forces in 2001, reports of the raping of Afghan women and girls by US soldiers has been reported by the media several times, but unfortunately no legal action has been taken by the government in any of the cases.
Some time back it was revealed that in several isolated provinces, forces under US supervision, mainly the US soldiers, took the money and belongings of the people without reason or explanation.
Till now, several reports have been sent about foreign forces forcefully taking away the money and personal belongings of Afghan residents with no explanation, and no one is ready to stand up to them. Many of these people faced violations and complained to government organizations, but the officials have refrained from taking any action against the US soldiers and NATO forces.
Indifference of authorities, bullying and rogue acts of foreign soldiers on the one hand, and the invasion of privacy by the Taliban on the other, has led to the deterioration of security in this isolated province and extremely worried the people.
What has the government done about these heinous acts? Like always, nothing! Most of the media outlets do not dare to report these crimes from fear of judicial officials and hunt by foreigners.
However, this hardly comes as a surprise from a government supported by the west, which is sitting silently in the face of raping and bullying by US forces and its creations, the Taliban.
…
Now you decide: these innocent suffering people are raped by foreign forces, what is sacred to them is insulted, they are bullied, they are threatened by the Taliban as well, and they see no good from the government, what should they do?
Originally published on Dec. 2, 2012
Click here to read the story on RAWA News
According to a report in the political section of the Afghanpaper, authentic reports given by the people state that special US forces raped a number of women in a village of Afghanistan, after attacking it.
US Special forces based in Afghanistan, raided a village in Chahar Bolak area of Balkh province at night, some days back (we apologize for not naming the village for certain reasons), and committed a horrendous crime. They raided houses of villagers and separated the men and women of 15 families living in this village. They then raped a number of these women.
The commander of the US soldiers warned the people of the village that this crime will be repeated should they complain to the authorities.
Since the occupation of our country by US forces in 2001, reports of the raping of Afghan women and girls by US soldiers has been reported by the media several times, but unfortunately no legal action has been taken by the government in any of the cases.
Some time back it was revealed that in several isolated provinces, forces under US supervision, mainly the US soldiers, took the money and belongings of the people without reason or explanation.
Till now, several reports have been sent about foreign forces forcefully taking away the money and personal belongings of Afghan residents with no explanation, and no one is ready to stand up to them. Many of these people faced violations and complained to government organizations, but the officials have refrained from taking any action against the US soldiers and NATO forces.
Indifference of authorities, bullying and rogue acts of foreign soldiers on the one hand, and the invasion of privacy by the Taliban on the other, has led to the deterioration of security in this isolated province and extremely worried the people.
What has the government done about these heinous acts? Like always, nothing! Most of the media outlets do not dare to report these crimes from fear of judicial officials and hunt by foreigners.
However, this hardly comes as a surprise from a government supported by the west, which is sitting silently in the face of raping and bullying by US forces and its creations, the Taliban.
…
Now you decide: these innocent suffering people are raped by foreign forces, what is sacred to them is insulted, they are bullied, they are threatened by the Taliban as well, and they see no good from the government, what should they do?
Originally published on Dec. 2, 2012
Click here to read the story on RAWA News
Hidden US-Israeli Military Agenda: “Break Syria into Pieces”
Global Research, December 28, 2012
A timely article in the Jerusalem Post in June brings to the
forefront the unspoken objective of US foreign policy, namely the
breaking up of Syria as a sovereign nation state –along ethnic and
religious lines– into several separate and “independent” political
entities. The article also confirms the role of Israel in the process of
political destabilization of Syria. The JP article is titled: “Veteran Kurdish politician calls on Israel to support the break-up of Syria‘ (by Jonathan Spyer) (The Jerusalem Post (May 16, 2012)
The objective of the US sponsored armed insurgency is –with the help of Israel– to “Break Syria into Pieces”.
The “balkanisation of the Syrian Arab Republic” is to be carried out by fostering sectarian divisions, which will eventually lead to a “civil war” modelled on the former Yugoslavia. Last month, Syrian “opposition militants” were dispatched to Kosovo to organize training sessions using the “terrorist expertise” of the US sponsored Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) in fighting the Yugoslav armed forces.
Sherkoh Abbas, President of the US based Kurdistan National Assembly of Syria (KNA) has “called on Israel to support the break-up of Syria into a series of federal structures based on the country’s various ethnicities.” (Ibid)
One possible ”break-up scenario” pertaining to Syria, which constitutes a secular multi-ethnic society, would be the formation of separate and “independent” Sunni, Alawite-Shiite, Kurdish and Druze states: “We need to break Syria into pieces,” Abbas said. (Quoted in JP, op. cit., emphasis added).
Map 1
Meeting behind Closed Doors at the US State Department
A top level US State Department meeting was held in May with members of the Syrian Kurdish opposition. In attendance were representatives of the Kurdish National Council (KNC), Robert Stephen Ford, the outgoing US ambassador to Syria (who has played a key role in channelling support to the rebels) as well as Frederic C. Hof, a former business partner of Richard Armitage, who currently serves as the administration’s “special coordinator on Syria”. (Ibid). The delegation also met with Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Jeffrey Feltman.
Frederic C. Hof, Robert Stephen Ford and Jeffrey Feltman are the State Department’s key Syria policy-makers, with close links to the Syrian Free Army (SFA) and the Syrian National Council (SNC).

Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Jeffrey Feltman

Frederic C. Hof, The Administration’s “special coordinator on Syria”

Robert S. Ford, outgoing US Ambassador to Syria
The public statements of KNA leader Sherkoh Abbas in the wake of the State Department meeting suggest that the political fracturing of the Syrian Arab Republic along ethnic and religious lines as well as the creation of an “independent Kurdistan” were discussed. “State Department Deputy Spokesman Mark Toner described [the meeting's] purpose as part of ‘ongoing efforts… to help the Syrian [Kurdish] opposition build a more cohesive opposition to Assad.’” (Ibid).
The KNA leader called upon Washington to support the creation of a separate Kurdish State consisting of “an autonomous region in Syria; joining the Kurdistan Regional Government in Iraq – which borders the Kurdish region in Syria; or perhaps an even larger Kurdish state” [Greater Kurdistan].
“The Kurdish people, in all parts of Kurdistan, seek the right to form an independent Kurdish state. We can only achieve this cherished goal with the help of the western democracies, and first and foremost the U.S.” said Sherkoh Abbas. (Syria: An Alternative, Choice, Ekurd.net, May 22, 2012)
It is worth noting, in this regard, that the creation of a “Greater Kurdistan” has been envisaged for several years by the Pentagon as part of a broader “Plan for Redrawing the Middle East”.(See map 2 below)
This option, which appears unlikely in the near future, would go against the interests of Turkey, a staunch ally of both the US and Israel. Another scenario, which is contemplated by Ankara would consist in the annexation to Turkey of parts of Syrian Kurdistan. (See map above).
“Greater Kurdistan” would include portions of Iran, Syria, Iraq and Turkey as conveyed in Coronel Ralph Peters (ret) celebrated map of “The New Middle East” (see below). (For Further details see Mahdi Nazemroaya’s November 2006 Global Research article).
Colonel Peters taught at the US Military Academy.
Detailed analysis on Syria.
Over 30 chapters, available from Global Research at no charge
SYRIA: NATO’s Next “Humanitarian” War?
ONLINE INTERACTIVE I-BOOK
- by Prof. Michel Chossudovsky – 2012-07-15
Plans for Redrawing the Middle East: The Project for a “New Middle East”
- by Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya – 2006-11-18
Towards the balkanization (division) and finlandization (pacification) of the Middle East
Map 2. The New Middle East

The following map was prepared by Lieutenant-Colonel Ralph Peters. It was published in the Armed Forces Journal in June 2006,
Peters is a retired colonel of the U.S. National War Academy. (Map Copyright Lieutenant-Colonel Ralph Peters 2006).
Although the map does not officially reflect Pentagon doctrine, it has been used in a training program at NATO’s Defense College for senior military officers.
This map, as well as other similar maps, has most probably been used at the National War Academy as well as in military planning circles.
The objective of the US sponsored armed insurgency is –with the help of Israel– to “Break Syria into Pieces”.
The “balkanisation of the Syrian Arab Republic” is to be carried out by fostering sectarian divisions, which will eventually lead to a “civil war” modelled on the former Yugoslavia. Last month, Syrian “opposition militants” were dispatched to Kosovo to organize training sessions using the “terrorist expertise” of the US sponsored Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) in fighting the Yugoslav armed forces.
Sherkoh Abbas, President of the US based Kurdistan National Assembly of Syria (KNA) has “called on Israel to support the break-up of Syria into a series of federal structures based on the country’s various ethnicities.” (Ibid)
One possible ”break-up scenario” pertaining to Syria, which constitutes a secular multi-ethnic society, would be the formation of separate and “independent” Sunni, Alawite-Shiite, Kurdish and Druze states: “We need to break Syria into pieces,” Abbas said. (Quoted in JP, op. cit., emphasis added).
“The Syrian Kurdish dissident argued that a federal Syria, separated into four or five regions on an ethnic basis, would also serve as a natural “buffer” for Israel against both Sunni and Shi’ite Islamist forces.” (Ibid.).Ironically, while Islamist forces are said to constitute the main threat to the Jewish State, Tel Aviv is providing covert support to the Islamist Free Syrian Army (FSA).
Map 1Meeting behind Closed Doors at the US State Department
A top level US State Department meeting was held in May with members of the Syrian Kurdish opposition. In attendance were representatives of the Kurdish National Council (KNC), Robert Stephen Ford, the outgoing US ambassador to Syria (who has played a key role in channelling support to the rebels) as well as Frederic C. Hof, a former business partner of Richard Armitage, who currently serves as the administration’s “special coordinator on Syria”. (Ibid). The delegation also met with Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Jeffrey Feltman.
Frederic C. Hof, Robert Stephen Ford and Jeffrey Feltman are the State Department’s key Syria policy-makers, with close links to the Syrian Free Army (SFA) and the Syrian National Council (SNC).

Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Jeffrey Feltman

Frederic C. Hof, The Administration’s “special coordinator on Syria”

Robert S. Ford, outgoing US Ambassador to Syria
The public statements of KNA leader Sherkoh Abbas in the wake of the State Department meeting suggest that the political fracturing of the Syrian Arab Republic along ethnic and religious lines as well as the creation of an “independent Kurdistan” were discussed. “State Department Deputy Spokesman Mark Toner described [the meeting's] purpose as part of ‘ongoing efforts… to help the Syrian [Kurdish] opposition build a more cohesive opposition to Assad.’” (Ibid).
The KNA leader called upon Washington to support the creation of a separate Kurdish State consisting of “an autonomous region in Syria; joining the Kurdistan Regional Government in Iraq – which borders the Kurdish region in Syria; or perhaps an even larger Kurdish state” [Greater Kurdistan].
“The Kurdish people, in all parts of Kurdistan, seek the right to form an independent Kurdish state. We can only achieve this cherished goal with the help of the western democracies, and first and foremost the U.S.” said Sherkoh Abbas. (Syria: An Alternative, Choice, Ekurd.net, May 22, 2012)
It is worth noting, in this regard, that the creation of a “Greater Kurdistan” has been envisaged for several years by the Pentagon as part of a broader “Plan for Redrawing the Middle East”.(See map 2 below)
This option, which appears unlikely in the near future, would go against the interests of Turkey, a staunch ally of both the US and Israel. Another scenario, which is contemplated by Ankara would consist in the annexation to Turkey of parts of Syrian Kurdistan. (See map above).
“Greater Kurdistan” would include portions of Iran, Syria, Iraq and Turkey as conveyed in Coronel Ralph Peters (ret) celebrated map of “The New Middle East” (see below). (For Further details see Mahdi Nazemroaya’s November 2006 Global Research article).
Colonel Peters taught at the US Military Academy.
Detailed analysis on Syria.
Over 30 chapters, available from Global Research at no charge
SYRIA: NATO’s Next “Humanitarian” War?
ONLINE INTERACTIVE I-BOOK
- by Prof. Michel Chossudovsky – 2012-07-15
Plans for Redrawing the Middle East: The Project for a “New Middle East”
- by Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya – 2006-11-18
Towards the balkanization (division) and finlandization (pacification) of the Middle East
Map 2. The New Middle East

The following map was prepared by Lieutenant-Colonel Ralph Peters. It was published in the Armed Forces Journal in June 2006,
Peters is a retired colonel of the U.S. National War Academy. (Map Copyright Lieutenant-Colonel Ralph Peters 2006).
Although the map does not officially reflect Pentagon doctrine, it has been used in a training program at NATO’s Defense College for senior military officers.
This map, as well as other similar maps, has most probably been used at the National War Academy as well as in military planning circles.
Scrambling for Africa’s Resources,
by Stephen Lendman
It’s more than about oil, stupid. It’s for vast African
riches. Resource/mineral wars define America’s agenda.
On December 15, 2006, the United States Africa Command
(AFRICOM) was authorized. On February 6, 2007, it was announced.
On October 1, 2007, it was established. On October 1,
2008, it became operational. It’s mission is controlling Africa’s riches.
They’re vast. They’re some of the world’s largest and
richest. Potential new deposits await to be found. Others known about await
development. Modern exploration methods enable global exploitation. Virtually
nothing escapes discovery.
Africa’s rich in oil, gas, gold, silver, diamonds,
uranium, iron, copper, tin, lead, nickel, coal, cobalt, bauxite, wood, coltan,
manganese, chromium, vanadium-bearing titanium, and much more.
Continental agricultural lands are valued. So is offshore
fishing.
Congo, Southern Sudan’s Darfur region, Gulf of Guinea,
Libya, Nigeria, and Niger, among other areas, hold special interest.
So does Mali. Last October, Reuters headlined “Mali war
plan to be ready within weeks: AU,” saying:
Military intervention is planned to reclaim territory
seized by “Islamist militants.” On March 22, an army coup toppled President
Amadou Toumani Toure.
At the time, France signaled readiness to intervene.
Malian junior officers revolted. They control northern areas. Obama officials
call Mali a “powder keg.” Conditions threaten regional destabilization, they
say.
Reasons are invented to intervene. Obama wants
congressional funding. He prioritizes wars. He’s eager to begin term two with
new ones. Permanent ones define his agenda.
NATO/EU partners are pressured to go along. Last October,
the Security Council approved an international military mission to Mali. Ban
Ki-moon was enlisted to help develop military intervention plans. Finalizing
them was planned for end of November.
France drafted the UN resolution. It was Washington’s
lead attack dog on Libya. It may have the same role on Mali. US special forces and
drone attacks may be planned.
They’re already involved. Covert ops and surveillance
began months ago. They’re prelude for what’s planned. Operations may replicate
Somalia, Yemen, or Libya 2.0 with less sustained air support.
Reuters called Mali “paralyzed by twin crises.”
Leadership is divided. Last June, reports said African Union officials asked
for Security Council intervention authority.
On December 20, it came unanimously. Timing was left
unaddressed. Authorization signaled Washington’s intention to intervene. Obama
already has. Greater invention is planned.
Security Council members voted days after Malian Prime
Minister Cheick Modibo Diarra’s resignation.
Coup members arrested him. They forced him out. He
strongly supports intervention.
Django Cissoko replaced him. He’s silent so far on
favoring it. Malian Foreign Minister Tieman Hubert Coulibaly called
authorization “historic.” His government supports it.
It asked Ban Ki-moon to “confirm in advance the council’s
satisfaction with the planned military offensive operation.”
Ban’s a reliable imperial ally. He’s replicated the worst
of Kofi Annan’s failures and betrayal.
Both men abhor peace. They support Washington’s wars and
occupations. They ignore Israel’s worst crimes. They’re indifferent to human
suffering. They call aggressive wars liberating ones.
They endorse America’s agenda. Mali’s in line to be
attacked, destroyed and controlled. Ban’s comfortable with more African
bloodshed. The entire Sahel region and beyond are threatened.
The Security Council resolution authorized an unspecified
troop strength African-led International Support Mission (AFISMA). An initial
one-year period was called for.
The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS)
wants 3,300 troops in Mali. They’ll be US/Western proxies. Nigerian forces
appear designated to lead them.
They’ll conduct ground operations. US, French, and other
NATO logistical, air, and intelligence operations will support them.
Timing remains undecided. Tactics are being planned.
Clarity may come post-holidays. Perhaps after Obama’s January 21 inauguration.
UN peacekeeping head, Herve Ladsous, suggested that
logistical planning may delay intervention until September or October.
France’s UN ambassador, Gerard Araud, called it premature
to say when military operations will begin. African and Malian troops must be
trained, he said. Much depends on political considerations.
Extreme weather may intervene. In late March, monsoon
season begins. It lasts months.
Timbuktu’s Mayor Halle Cisse asked for “rapid military
action to liberate our cities.”
“There is no school. There is no work and no money,” he
added. “We are fed up with this situation.” Timbuktu depends on tourism.
Conflict keeps people away.
Media scoundrel fear mongering said Islamists imposed
sharia law. Managed news misreporting made lurid claims. Propaganda substitutes
for truth. Claims about banned public male/female socializing were featured.
Other accounts stressed attacking bars selling alcohol,
recruiting child fighters, stonings, whippings, beheadings, amputations, and
other punishments against non-believers.
Public sentiment is being prepared for intervention.
US-style responsibility to protect (R2P) perhaps plans Libya 2.0 light.
For months, France and Washington held secret
intervention talks. Rousting “Islamist militants” is pretext. So is waging war
on terror. Resource control is policy.
Thursday’s resolution welcomed ECOWAS troop pledges. It
called for member states’ help. Chad, Mauritania and Niger were asked to
contribute. Their troops have desert warfare experience.
Resolution language stressed two-track planning.
Political and military were called for.
US and French special forces operate in Mali. They’re
active in other regional countries. They conduct covert operations. They’re
training Malian forces. Stepped up efforts are planned.
AFRICOM head General Carter Ham called Malian and other
regional conditions “vastly different than they were previously. There are now
non-Al Qaeda associated (militant) groups that present significant threats to
the United States.”
Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) raises most
concern, he said. It’s also called “the Salafist Group for Call and Combat.”
Other regional groups include “the Movement for Unity and Jihad in West
Africa.”
“It is clear to me they aspire to conduct events more
broadly across the region, and eventually to the United States,” claimed Ham.
“That is the ideology. That is the campaign plan.
Establish the caliphate and spread the ideology. Attack Western interests.
Attack democrat forms of government. We are certainly seeing it.”
America creates pretexts to intervene. When enemies don’t
exist they’re invented. Imperial strategy prioritizes it.
Algiers University Professor Ahmed Adhimi believes
Afghanistanizing the Sahel region looms.
Military intervention will attract “adventurers,
terrorists, and all those who want to fight the Crusaders” like flower-containing
pollen and nectar draw bees to produce honey.
Cross-border conflict may follow. Algeria may become
Africa’s Pakistan. Washington may drag Algiers into a war it doesn’t want.
It’ll end up victimized like other US targets. Obama perhaps plans it.
A Final Comment
CIA elements operate covertly virtually everywhere. So do
US special forces in 120 or more countries.
Fifty-four nations comprise Africa. In 2013, the Pentagon
plans sending “small teams” to over 35 of them. Perhaps they’re already in most
of the other 19.
Reports about their role limited to training and
equipping efforts don’t wash. US forces everywhere are combat trained and
ready.
Special forces are assassins. They specialize in search
and destroy, extrajudicial assassinations, and other lawless acts.
Washington wants unchallenged African dominance. AFRICOM
was established to rape the continent’s riches.
Proxy and direct wars are prioritized. Expect much more
in resource-rich areas.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at
lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.
His new book is titled “Banker Occupation: Waging
Financial War on Humanity.”
http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanII.html
Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen
to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio
News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time
and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy
listening.
http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour
http://www.dailycensored.com/scrambling-for-africas-resources/
Somalia: Muslims murder Christian for leaving Islam
NAIROBI, Kenya (Morning Star News) – Gunmen in central Somalia on Saturday (Dec. 8) killed an underground Christian who had been receiving death threats for leaving Islam, area sources said.
Two unidentified masked men shot Mursal Isse Siad, 55, outside his home in Beledweyne, 206 miles (332 kilometers) north of Mogadishu, for leaving Islam, Muslim and Christian sources told Morning Star News. The assailants fled immediately after the murder.
Siad’s oldest daughter (name withheld), 15, said her father was killed “because he failed to attend the mosque for prayers and used to pray at home. He used to share with us about Jesus.” She said that he had received messages on his mobile phone stating, “We know what you are doing, and you must stop, otherwise you risk your life.”
Siad’s 42-year-old wife (name withheld), three daughters and two sons have fled the area, fearing for their lives.
A Christian source in Mogadishu confirmed the killing, and a Muslim resident of the Beledweyne area also said Siad was killed for leaving Islam.
“Siad deserved to die because he was not committed to the Islamic religion,” the resident said....
Two unidentified masked men shot Mursal Isse Siad, 55, outside his home in Beledweyne, 206 miles (332 kilometers) north of Mogadishu, for leaving Islam, Muslim and Christian sources told Morning Star News. The assailants fled immediately after the murder.
Siad’s oldest daughter (name withheld), 15, said her father was killed “because he failed to attend the mosque for prayers and used to pray at home. He used to share with us about Jesus.” She said that he had received messages on his mobile phone stating, “We know what you are doing, and you must stop, otherwise you risk your life.”
Siad’s 42-year-old wife (name withheld), three daughters and two sons have fled the area, fearing for their lives.
A Christian source in Mogadishu confirmed the killing, and a Muslim resident of the Beledweyne area also said Siad was killed for leaving Islam.
“Siad deserved to die because he was not committed to the Islamic religion,” the resident said....
AFRICOM helps with C. African Republic evacs
By Lolita C. Baldor - The Associated Press
Posted : Thursday Dec 28, 2012
WASHINGTON
— The State Department has closed its embassy in the Central African
Republic and ordered the ambassador and his diplomatic team to leave the
country as rebels there continue to advance and violence escalates,
U.S. officials said Thursday.Posted : Thursday Dec 28, 2012
A Pentagon spokesman, Army Lt. Col. Todd Breasseale, said that at the State Department’s request, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta had directed U.S. Africa Command to evacuate U.S. citizens and designated foreign nationals from the U.S. Embassy in Bangui “to safe havens in the region.”
State Department spokesman Patrick Ventrell said the U.S. Embassy had temporarily suspended operations, but not diplomatic relations with the country.
“This decision is solely due to concerns about the security of our personnel and has no relation to our continuing and long-standing diplomatic relations” with the Central African Republic, Ventrell said in a statement.
Shortly after announcing the evacuation Thursday, the State Department warned U.S. citizens against travel to the Central African Republic, saying it could not “provide protection or routine consular services to U.S. citizens” and urging Americans who have decided to stay to “review their personal security situation and seriously consider departing” on commercial flights. Four days earlier, the State Department had issued a warning recommending against travel to the country and authorizing its non-emergency personnel in Bangui to leave.
U.S. officials said about 40 people were evacuated on an U.S. Air Force plane bound for Kenya. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to discuss the details of the operation.
The departure of Ambassador Laurence Wohlers and his staff comes as the president of the Central African Republic on Thursday urgently called on France and other foreign powers to help his government fend off rebels who are quickly seizing territory and approaching this capital city, but French officials declined to offer any military assistance.
Rebels have seized at least 10 towns across the sparsely populated north, and residents in the capital of 600,000 people fear insurgents could attack at any time.
The developments suggest the Central African Republic could be on the brink of another violent change in government, something not new to the impoverished country. The current president, Francois Bozize, himself came to power nearly a decade ago in the wake of a rebellion.
Speaking to crowds in Bangui, Bozize pleaded with foreign powers to do what they could. He pointed in particular to France, Central African Republic’s former colonial ruler.
About 200 French soldiers are already in the country, providing technical support and helping to train the local army, according to the French defense ministry.
French President Francois Hollande said Thursday that France wants to protect its interests in Central African Republic and not Bozize’s government. Paris is encouraging peace talks between the government and the rebels.
President Obama late last year sent about 100 U.S. special operations forces to the region — including Central African Republic — to assist in the hunt for Joseph Kony, the fugitive rebel leader of the notorious Lord’s Resistance Army. Forces have been hunting the elusive warlord in Central African Republic, South Sudan and Congo.
Associated Press writer Matthew Lee contributed to this report.
Maxaabiista Xabsiga Dhexe Ee Hargeysa Oo La Barayo Xirfado Lagu Dhaqan-celinayo
Taliska guud ee Ciidamada Asluubta Somaliland, ayaa markii u
horreysay hirgeliyey qorshe Xirfado kala duwan lagu barayo boqolaaal ka mid ah
Maxaabiista kujirta Jeelka dhexe ee Magaalada Hargeysa, kuwaas oo ay ka mid
yihiin Maxaabisti Budh-cad badeeda ee dibadda lagaga soo waariday dalka.
![]() |
| Xabsiga Dhexe ee Hargeisa |
Taliyaha Ciidamada Asluubta Axmed Xuseen Faarax iyo Taliyaha
Xabsiga Dhexe ee Hargeysa Cumar Siciid oo shalay warbaahinta ugu waramayay
Gudaha Xabsiga Casimadda, ayaa war bixiyey qorshaha xirfadaha kala duwan loogu
sameeyey maxaabiista ay gacanta ku hayaan.
Taliyaha Xabsiga Dhexe Cumar Siciid oo ugu horayn halkaas ka
hadlay, ayaa faahfaahin ka bixiyey ujeeddada xirfadaha loo abuuray maxaabiita.
“waxaanu ku talo-galay in Dadkan (Maxaabiista) dhaqan celin loo sameeyo oo inta
Nolosha toosan ka leexatay loo soo leexiyo waddada toosan ayaanu arrintan
ugu talo galnay. Maxaabiistan halkan ka shaqaynaysa waxay is-kugu jiraan
Maxaabiistii Kiiska madaniga ah ee sameeyay gacan dhaafka, sida tuugta iyo
waxyabahaas oo kale iyo Budh-cad Badeeddii laga keenay dalka Sishiles,
kuwaas oo wax la barayo oo ay jeelka uga baxaan sidii ay noloshooda ugu dabari
lahaayeen,”ayuu yidhi Taliyaha Xabsiga dhexe ee Hargeysa Cumar Siciid
Taliyaha Ciidanka Asluubta Gen. Maxamed Xuseen Faarax oo
isaguna halkaas ka hadlay, waxaanu yidhi, “Waxa weeye in Maxbuusku baxo isaga
oo aqoon leh ama ha barto baadhista ama sida loo sameeyo Jaajuurka ama
Nijaarnimada ama dhisida guryaha
Mid ka mid ah Maxaabiista u xidhan falalka
budhcad-badeednimo ee Jeelka weyn ee Magaalada Hargeysa ku jirta, ayaa ka
warbixiyey xaaladooda nololeed, waxaanu yidhi, “Waxaan salaamayaa dadkaygii oo
dhan. Waxaan ahay maxbuus ku xidhan Somaliland, kuna eedaysan Budh-cad badeed,
macaan ayaa igu dhacay dabadeed qoladayadii waxa naloo sameeyay shaqo. Wax
dhibaato ah oo nalagu hayaa majirto oo waxaanu ka mid nahay Maxaabiista jeelka
ku jirta ee dalka u dhalatay oo kale. Wax wacan ayaa lana baray oo waxaanu
hadda baranay xirfad. Markaa waxaanu doonaynaa markaanu baxno inaanu ku
shaqaysano xirfada nalabaray,”sidaas ayuu yidhi maxbuuskan ku xidhan falalka
budhcad-badeednimo oo dawladda Sychelles ku soo wareejisay Somaliland ka dib
markii lagu xukumay dalkaas
Maxbuus kale oo ku xidhan xabsiga Dhexe ee Hargeysa, una
xidhan falal budhcad-badeednimo, ayaa farriin u diray Qoyskiisa, isaga oo sidoo
kale ka warramay xaaladdiisa nololeed, “Waxaan salaamayaa Eheladayda iyo
qaraabadaydii. waxaanu ku xidhan nahay Jeelka Hargeysa, Noloshayadu aad
ayay u wannaagsan tahay, waxaana layga soo beddelay Xabsi kuyaala Sishilis,
xaaladaydu way wacan tahay oo waan shaqeynayaa, wixii danbi ah ee nalagu soo
xidhay maanta waxaanu ku beddelanay hawlo aad iyo aad u wacan oo waxaanu
gacanta ku haynaa xirfad aan rajeynayo inaan mustaqbalka ku shaqaysan doono,”
ayuu yidhi Maxbuuskani
http://ogaalnews.net/?p=18768
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)



