By
STEENOKKERZEEL,
Belgium — For Kurt Ryon, the mayor of Steenokkerzeel, a Flemish village 10
miles northeast of Brussels, watching the Scottish independence campaign in the
final days before the referendum is like watching a good game of soccer. “They
were losing for the first half and most of the second half,” he said, “but now
we’re in the 85th minute and they could be winning.”
Mr.
Ryon, who wants his native Flanders to split from Belgium, is rooting for
Scotland to do the same from Britain, and like a faithful soccer fan he has all
the gear: a T-shirt from the Scottish pro-independence “yes” campaign, a
collection of “yes” pins on his denim jacket and copious amounts of a beer
specially brewed by Flemish nationalists to express their solidarity. The label
says “Ja!” next to a Scottish flag, Flemish for yes.
From
Catalonia to Kurdistan, nationalist and separatist movements inEurope and
beyond are watching the Scottish independence referendum closely — sometimes more so than Britons
themselves, who seem to have only just woken up to the possibility that
Scotland might vote next Thursday to bring to an end a 307-year union. A
curious collection of left and right, rich and poor, marginal and mainstream,
these movements are united in the hope that their shared ambition for more
self-determination will get a lift from an independent Scotland.
PLAY VIDEO|1:44
Scotland’s
Debate: Stay Big or Go Small
On
Sept. 18, Scotland is scheduled to vote on seceding from Britain. We take a
look at the issues at stake for the Scottish people.
In the
separatist-minded Basque Country, an autonomous community in northern Spain,
the leader of the governing nationalist party has been known to dress up in a
Scottish kilt and jokes that Basques would rather be part of an independent
Scotland than remain part of Spain, which has ruled out any kind of vote. In
Veneto, a region of northern Italy, nationalists have held a Scottish-inspired
online referendum and now claim that 9 in 10 inhabitants want autonomy.
Busloads
of Catalans, South Tiroleans, Corsicans, Bretons, Frisians and “Finland-Swedes”
are headed for Scotland to witness the vote. Even Bavaria (which calls itself
“Europe’s seventh-largest economy”) is sending a delegation.
“It
would create a very important precedent,” said Naif Bezwan of Mardin Artuklu
University in the Kurdish part of Turkey. Across the Iraqi border (“the
Kurdish-Kurdish border,” as Mr. Bezwan puts it), where a confluence of war, oil
disputes and political turmoil has renewed the debate about secession, Kurds
pine for the opportunity of a Scottish-style breakup. “Everyone here is
watching,” said Hemin Lihony, the web manager
at Rudaw, Kurdistan’s largest news organization, based in Erbil, Iraq.
History
offers few examples of nations splitting up in a consensual way. The velvet
divorce between the Czechs and the Slovaks in 1993 is one, the Norwegian
referendum on independence from Sweden in 1905 another. But mostly, nation
states go to war over their borders.
America
fought a civil war to preserve the union. Turkey fought Kurdish nationalists
for decades and still denies them the right to Kurdish-languageeducation. Kosovo declared its independence from Serbia
— a status still not recognized by some countries — only after a war in the
1990s.
President
Vladimir V. Putin of Russia, who annexed Crimea in March after a stealth
invasion and a referendum there, and who has been accused of aggressively
aiding separatists in eastern Ukraine, has happily supported Scotland’s
independence bid. But his attachment to self-determination is highly selective:
In the Russian republics of Chechnya and Dagestan, he has deployed savage force
to crush Muslim separatists seeking to break from Russia.
In some
cases, the referendum in Scotland is fueling new hopes, however improbable,
among separatist fringe groups. When the president of the Texas Nationalist
Movement, Daniel Miller, was invited to the University of Stirling in Scotland
this year, he said the Scots were paving the way
for an independent Texas. “Scottish independence is a study in the very same
debates that will take place in Texas ahead of the binding referendum on
independence that is in our future,” Mr. Miller said.
In
others, it is re-energizing long-running debates with considerable geopolitical
importance. In Taiwan, which China claims as part of its territory even though
Taiwan is effectively independent with its own currency, military and
democratically elected government, some hope that a Scottish “yes” vote could
trigger a more careful deliberation over the island’s future.
Wang
Dan, a student leader in the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests in Beijing, wrote
in a recent column for Taiwan’s Apple Daily,
“If the Scottish vote succeeds, it will be worth considering by those who
advocate deciding Taiwan’s status through a referendum.”
But it
is in Europe that a Scottish “yes” vote would likely create the largest
ripples.
It
would be the first time that a member of the European Union faces secession by
one of its regions. If Scotland succeeds in negotiating its own membership in
the bloc, as even opponents of independence predict that it eventually would,
it would suddenly make the prospect of independence seem safer and more
attractive elsewhere on the Continent, said George Robertson, a former secretary
general of NATO.
“There
is a serious risk of a domino effect,” said Mr. Robertson, himself a Scot and
an opponent of independence. A “yes” vote, he warned, could trigger “the
Balkanization of Europe.”
Nationalists,
however, say that a bit of Balkanization may be just what Europe needs.
In the
slightly dilapidated Brussels office of the European Free Alliance, which
groups together 40 parties representing Europe’s “stateless nations,” a busy
map shows what Europe would look like if they all became independent.
François
Alfonsi, the president of the alliance and a proud Corsican, admits that it
would be messy, but “democracy is messy and democracy is what Europe needs.”
National
self-determination, he said, “is about bringing policies closer to the people.”
Across
town, Mark Demesmaeker, a Flemish member of the European Parliament who has
decorated his office with a Scottish flag and keeps a copy of the Scottish
white paper on independence on his desk, speaks of “failed nation states.”
In his
view, Britain has failed to give the Scots and Welsh proper representation in
Parliament, and Spain has failed to deliver democracy to Catalans and Basques
eager to have their own independence vote.
Other
nations, like France and Italy, have been mired in political and economic
stagnation. Mr. Demesmaeker’s own country, Belgium, cannot even form a
government. (Belgium had elections in May and is still deep in coalition talks;
the last time it took 541 days.)
Pro-European
national movements like his own, the New Flemish Alliance — now the biggest
party not just in Flanders but in all of Belgium — are the best antidote to the
far-right, anti-European and anti-immigrant nationalist movements that did so
well in European elections earlier this year, he said.
“If
Scotland votes ‘yes,’ it will be an eye opener for many people on the street,”
he said. “Most people think it’s our fate to be part of Belgium. But Flanders
could be a prosperous nation. It’s a democratic evolution that is going on in different
states of the European Union. Eventually we want Flanders to take its place in
the E.U.”
If
plenty of nationalists have pledged their solidarity with Scotland, the reverse
has been less true. The Scottish referendum takes place just days before the
regional government of Catalonia is expected to confirm that it will hold an
independence vote of its own on Nov. 9, which would override legal and
political objections from Madrid.
Alfred
Bosch, a Catalan lawmaker, said his counterparts in Scotland had shown little
interest in being associated with events in
Catalonia.
The
Scots “probably want to distance themselves from anything that they see as not
as ripe and as mature as their own process,” Mr. Bosch suggested. “They don’t
want to create any hostility from Spain or other countries that might also have
pro-independence movements,” not least because those governments will have to
recognize an independent Scotland and consider whether to allow it into the
European Union.
Whatever
the outcome of next week’s referendum, many nationalists say Scotland has
already won.
“They
have the opportunity to decide their own future,” said Andoni Ortuzar, the
president of the governing Basque Nationalist Party, who wore a kilt in the
2012 carnival to celebrate the announcement of a Scottish referendum that year.
“That’s
what national self-determination is,” he said. “That’s all we ask.”
-------------------
Azam Ahmed contributed reporting from Erbil, Iraq; Raphael
Minder from Madrid; and Austin Ramzy from Taipei, Taiwan.
No comments:
Post a Comment