Special Rapporteur on human rights defenders, Margaret Sekaggya. UN Photo/Jean-Marc Ferré |
Member States must provide human rights
defenders and activists with at least a “bare minimum” of a legal framework
that enables them to work freely and effectively, a United Nations independent
expert today urged.
Speaking at the presentation of her latest
report to the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva on the role of national human
rights institutions in the promotion and protection of human rights, the
Special Rapporteur on human rights defenders, Margaret Sekaggya, expressed deep
concern about the widespread trend of using legislation “to restrict,
criminalize, and stigmatize the work of human rights defenders in all parts of
the world.”
“From anti-terrorism and other legislation
relating to public security to legislation governing registration, functioning
and funding of associations, from defamation and blasphemy legislation to
legislation relating to public morals, States are using laws and administrative
provisions to unduly restrict the work of human rights defenders,” Ms. Sekaggya
warned.
According to the Human Rights Council, human
rights defenders can “act to address any human right, or rights, on behalf of
individuals or groups” and “seek the promotion and protection of civil and
political rights as well.”
Ms. Sekaggya noted that in the face of
discouragement, the “best guarantee” for ensuring legislation in compliance
with human rights activities was a “robust, independent, and well-resourced
national human rights institution.”
“National institutions can be key actors in
the fight against stigmatization, misuse of legislation and impunity,” she
said.
However, the UN expert also raised concern
about reported violations against national institutions themselves, including
their staff and members, through attacks, threats and intimidation and
harassment, noting that such antagonistic behaviour risked undermining “the
independence, efficiency, credibility and impact of such institutions.”
“States should ensure proper consultation
processes when new legislation is being discussed and should be open to
assessing the impact of existing legislation,” she continued, adding that “this
requires close cooperation and frank engagement with the main stakeholders, in
particular with civil society and national human rights institutions.”
Pointing to a number of governments which she
said had “gone about creatively” to ensure that recommendations from national
institutions were duly implemented to facilitate the work of human rights
defenders, Ms. Sekaggya concluded by calling on Member States to consult the
good practices in her report and apply them where needed.
Independent experts, or special rapporteurs,
like Ms. Sekaggya, are appointed by the Geneva-based Council to examine and
report back on a country situation or a specific human rights theme. The
positions are honorary and the experts are not UN staff, nor are they paid for
their work.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Horn-Watch welcomes your comment